Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 351–358 | Cite as

“Austerian” economics: Does the Vienna school favor fiscal deficit reduction even in a subpar economy?

  • Lawrence H. White
Article
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Does the economic analysis associated with the modern Austrian school favor a policy of restraining the government’s fiscal deficit even in a subpar economy, as suggested by those who (pejoratively) label such a policy “austerian”? Because resources are not superabundant even in a subpar economy, the answer is yes, unless (implausibly) the return on the last (lowest-payoff) dollar of government expenditure exceeds the return on private investment.

Keywords

Austerian Austerity Austrian Fiscal deficit Free lunch Hayek Keynes Mises Multiplier Ricardian equivalence 
JEL codes B2 E3 E6 H6 

References

  1. Barro, R. (1974). Are government bonds Net wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R., (2009). “Government Spending Is No Free Lunch,” Wall St. Journal (Jan. 22), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB123258618204604599. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  3. Baum, C., (2013). “Kinsley, Krugman and Austerian Aliens,” Bloomberg.com (16 May), http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-05-16/kinsley-krugman-and-austerian-aliens. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  4. Desai, M., (2013). “Column: Are we back to the past?,” Financial Express (28 Oct.), http://m.financialexpress.com/news/column-are-we-back-to-the-past-/1187939/. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  5. Garrison, R. (2001). Time and money: The macroeconomics of capital structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Garrison, R., (1998). Chronically Large Federal Budget Deficits, Free Market Foundation Monograph 18. Sandton, South Africa: the Free Market Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Gregory, T. E., F. A. von Hayek, Plant, A. & Robbins, L., (1932). “Spending and Saving: Public Works from Rates” [Letter to the Editor], Times of London (19 Oct.), http://thinkmarkets.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/keynes-hayek-1932-cambridgelse.pdf . Accessed 18 June 2014.
  8. Hansen, A. 1941. Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Hawtrey, R., G., (1925). “Public Expenditure and the Demand for Labour,” Economica, No. 13 (March), pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
  10. Hutt, W. H. (1939). The theory of idle resources. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  11. Krugman, P., (2011). “Friedrich Hayek, Zombie,” The Conscience of a Liberal blog (29 March), http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/friedrich-hayek-zombie/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0. Accessed 21 June 2014.
  12. Lerner, A. P. 1944. The Economics of Control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Ritholtz, B., (2010). “Word Origins: ‘Austerians’,” The Big Picture blog (28 June), http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/06/word-origins-austerians/. Accessed 18 June 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Skidelsky, R. 2011. “The Keynes-Hayek Rematch,” (August 29), CNN World website, http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/19/the-keynes-hayekrematch/. Accessed 30 June 2014.
  15. White, L. H. (2012). The clash of economic ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations