Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 311–335 | Cite as

Polycentricity, Self-governance, and the Art & Science of Association

  • Peter J. Boettke
  • Jayme S. Lemke
  • Liya PalagashviliEmail author
Article

Abstract

When considered as a unified project, the Ostroms’ themes of polycentricity, self-governance, and the art and science of association have strong intellectual roots and connections with Austrian economics. In this paper, we show the close relationship between the Ostroms and the Austrians. We then describe how contemporary Austrian economists can be inspired and can further the work of the Ostroms in the areas of civil societies and self-governing communities, the use of fieldwork and case studies, and public economies and coproduction. Although there are perceived tensions between the Ostroms and the Austrians, we contend that these can be reconciled and pursued as fruitful areas of research.

Keywords Vincent and Elinor Ostrom polycentricity Austrian economics institutions self-governance 

JEL classification

H0 H40 H77 O17 

References

  1. Allen, B. (2011). Editor’s Introduction”. In B. Allen (Ed.), The Quest to Understand Human Affairs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Aligica, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2013). Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 726–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, T., & Hill, P. J. (2004). The Not So Wild, Wild West. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, C. D., & Ostrom, E. (1995). Human Ecology and Resource Sustainability: The Importance of Institutional Diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26(1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bish, R. (2012). Remarks. Prepared for the Indiana Memorial Union, Reflections on the Ostroms, October, 6, 2012. Available at http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/tributes/BISH_tribute.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Bish, R. (2014). Vincent Ostrom on Local Government: The Evolution of an Inquiry. Presented for the Public Choice Society Meetings, March, 6–9, 2014. Available at http://publicchoicesociety.org/content/papers/robertbish-465-2014-800.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. J. (2012a). Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. J. (2012b). Anarchism and Austrian Economics. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 7(1), 125–140.Google Scholar
  10. Boettke, P. (1993). Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation (p. 1993). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boettke, P. J. (1990). The Theory of Spontaneous Order and Cultural Evolution in the Social Theory of F.A. Hayek. Cultural Dynamics, 3(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2005). Methodological Individualism, Spontaneous Order and the Research Program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2011). Quasimarket Failure. Public Choice, 149(1/2), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boettke, P. J., & Snow, N. A. (2014). Political Economy and the science of association: A suggested reconstruction of public choice through the alliance of the Vienna, Virginia, and Bloomington schools of political economy. Review of Austrian Economics, 27(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchanan, J.M. (1989 [1999]). The Ethics of Constitutional Order. In, The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty, Volume 1. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty FundGoogle Scholar
  16. Boettke, P. J., Lemke, J. S., & Palagashvili, L. (2013). Riding in Cars with Boys: Elinor Ostrom’s Adventures with the Police. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(4), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buchanan, J.M. (1988 [1991]). The Potential and Limits of Socially Organized Humankind. In, Economics and Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  18. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. 1999.Google Scholar
  19. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010a). The Cultural and Political Economy of Recovery: Social Learning in a post-disaster environment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010b). Qualitative Methods and the Pursuit of Economic Understanding. Review of Austrian Economics, 23(4), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. (2011). Social capital, lobbying, and community-based interest groups. Public Choice, 149, 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. (2010). The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in Post-Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 2(1/2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cole. D. (2012, June 13). Elinor Ostrom obituary. The Guardian. Retreived September 22, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jun/13/elinor-ostrom
  24. Cornuelle, R. (1983). Healing America. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, R., & Ostrom, E. (1991). Rules and Games. Public Choice, 70(2), 121–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gellar, S. (2005). Democracy in Senegal. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghate, R., Ghate, S., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Can Communities Plan, Grow and Sustainably Harvest from Forests. Economic & Political Weekly, 48, 59–67.Google Scholar
  28. Grube, L. and Storr, V. (forthcoming). The capacity for self-governance and post-disaster resilience. The Review of Austrian Economics.Google Scholar
  29. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hayek, F. A. (1946 [1948]). Individualism: True and False. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hayek, F.A. (1945 [1948]). The Use of Knowledge in Society. In, Individualism and Economic Order, F.A. Hayek (ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hayek, F. A. (1939 [1948]). The Economic Condition of Inter-state Federalism. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 111–146.Google Scholar
  35. Ishak, S. T. (1972). Consumers’ Perception of Police Performance: Consolidation vs. Deconcentration: The Case of Grand Rapids, Michigan Metropolitan Area. Ph.D dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Lachmann, L. M. (1978). Capital and its structure. Kansas City, MO: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  38. Laerhoven, F., & Berge, E. (2011). The 20th Anniversary of Elinor Ostrom’s Governing the Commons. International Journal of the Commons, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  39. Langer, E. (2012, June 13). Elinor Ostrom, first woman to win the Nobel Prize in economics, dies at 78. Washington Post. Retrieved September 22, 2013, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/elinor-ostrom-first-woman-to-receive-nobel-prize-in-economics-dies-at-78/2012/06/13/gJQAMO2vaV_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
  40. Lahart, J. (2009, Oct. 13). Nobel Looks Outside Markets. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB125534373296580027Google Scholar
  41. Leeson, P. T. (2011). Government, clubs, and constitutions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leeson, P. T. (2009). The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Leeson, P. T. (2007). An-arrgh-chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 1049–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leeson, P. T. (2006). Cooperation and Conflict: Evidence on Self-Enforcing Arrangements and Heterogeneous Groups. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(4), 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leeson, P. T. (2005). Endogenizing Fractionalization. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kiser, L., & Ostrom, E. (1982). Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry (pp. 179–222). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Kiser, L., & Ostrom, E. (1979). A Political Economy Approach to the Analysis of Institutional Behavior and Consequences. Working Paper W79-32. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Available at http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/3918.Google Scholar
  48. McGinnis, M. D. (2005). Beyond Individualism and Spontaneity: Comments on Peter Boettke and Christopher Coyne. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57(2), 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mises, L. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes. 1996.Google Scholar
  50. Mises, L. (1920). Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Collectivist Economic Planning. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  51. Mwangi, E., & Ostrom, E. (2009). Top-Down Solutions: Looking Up from East Africa’s Rangelands. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Hara, E. A., & Ribstein, L. E. (2009). The Law Market. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ostrom, E. (2011). Honoring James Buchanan. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80(2), 265–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom, E. (2010a). A long polycentric journey. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ostrom, E. (2010b). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ostrom, E. (2005a). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ostrom, E. (2005b). Policies that Crowd out Reciprocity and Collective Action. In, Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, and Ernst Fehr (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 253–275.Google Scholar
  58. Ostrom, E. (2004). Coevolving Relationships between Political Science and Economics. Rationality, Markets and Morals, 3, 51–65.Google Scholar
  59. Ostrom, E. (2002). How Farmer Managed Irrigation Systems Build Social Capital to Outperform Agency Managed Systems that Rely Primarily on Physical Capital. In, Farmer Managed Irrigation Systems in the Changed Context: Proceedings of the Second International Seminar, April 19, 2002, Kathmandu, Nepal. Prachanda Pradhan and Upendra Gautam, (eds). pp. 25–32. Kathmandu, Nepal: FMIS Promotion TrustGoogle Scholar
  60. Ostrom, E. (1998). The Comparative Study of Public Economies. The American Economist, 42(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  61. Ostrom, E. (1997a). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development, 24, 1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostrom, E. (1987). Microconstitutional Change in Multiconstitutional Political Systems. Workshop in Political Theory & Policy Analysis Working Paper. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10535/4258.Google Scholar
  65. Ostrom, E. (1965). Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management. PhD dissertation: University of Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  66. Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2007). Working Paper W07-19. Workshop in: Political Theory and Policy Analysis. The Meaning of Social Capital and its Link to Collective Action.Google Scholar
  67. Ostrom, E., Baugh, W., Gaurasci, R., Parks, R. B., & Whitaker, G. P. (1973). Community organization and the provision of police services. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (2008). Private and Common Property Rights. Encyclopedia of Law & Economics. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  69. Ostrom, E., Fung Lam, W., Pradhan, P., & Shivakoti, G. (2011). Improving Irrigation in Asia: Sustainable Performance of an Innovative Intervention in Nepal. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2007). Institutions, Collective Action and Effective Forest Management: Learning from Studies in Nepal. In, The Sage Handbook of Environment and Society, ed. Jules Pretty, et al., 578–89. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2006). Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. PNAS, 103(51), 19224–19231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., & Whitaker, G. P. (1978). Patterns of metropolitan policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  73. Ostrom, E., & Whitaker, G. P. (1974 [1999]). Community Control and Government Responsiveness: The Case of Police in Black Communities. In, Improving the Quality of Urban Management in Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, D. Rogers and W. Hawley (eds), 8: 303–34. Beverly Hills: Sage. Reprinted. In M. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  74. Ostrom, E., & Whitaker, G. P. (1973). Does Local Community Control of Police Make a Difference? American Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ostrom, V. (1997b). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerabilities of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  76. Ostrom, V. (1988). Executive Leadership, Authority Relationships, and Public Entrepreneurship. In, The Quest to Understand Human Affairs, Barbara Allen (ed.). Lanham. MD: Lexington Books, 2011, 433–449.Google Scholar
  77. Ostrom, V. (1980). Artisanship and Artifact. Public Administration Review, 40(4), 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ostrom, V. (1972). Polycentricity. Workshop Archives, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Presented at Workshop on Metropolitan Governance, American Political Science Association Meeting, Washington, DC, September 5–8, 1972.Google Scholar
  79. Ostrom, V. (1971a). An Alternative Approach to the Design of Public Organizational Arrangements. In, The Quest to Understand Human Affairs, Barbara Allen (ed.). Lanham. MD: Lexington Books, 2011, 177–216.Google Scholar
  80. Ostrom, V. (1971b). [2008]). The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  81. Ostrom, V. (1962). The Water Economy and its Organization. Natural Resources Journal, 2, 55–73.Google Scholar
  82. Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977). Public Goods and Public Choices. In, Alternatives for Delivering Public Services. Toward Improved Performance, E.S. Savas (ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 7–49.Google Scholar
  83. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Parks, R.B. (1979). Assessing the Influence or Organization on Performance: A Study of Police Services in Residential Neighborhoods. Ph.D. dissertation, Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
  85. Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rampell, C. (2012, June 12). Elinor Ostrom, Winner of Nobel in Economics, dies at 78. New York Times. Retrieved September 22, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/business/elinor-ostrom-winner-of-nobel-in-economics-dies-at-78.html?
  87. Rogers, B., & Lipsey, C. M. (1974). Metropolitan Reform: Citizen Evaluations of Performances in Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee. Publius, 4, 19–34.Google Scholar
  88. Rothbard, M. N. (1982). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: NYU Press. 2002.Google Scholar
  89. Sawyer, A. (2005). Beyond Plunder: Toward Democratic Governance in Liberia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publisher, Inc.Google Scholar
  90. Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Shelly, J. (2009, Oct. 12). First woman wins Nobel Prize for economics. Cnn. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/12/nobel.economics/Google Scholar
  92. Skarbek, D. (2011). Governance and Prison Gangs. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 702–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, A., Wagner, R., & Yandle, B. (2011). A Theory of Entangled Political Economy with Application to TARP and NRA. Public Choice, 23, 151–165.Google Scholar
  94. Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Uchitelle, L. (2009, Oct. 12). Two Americans Are Awarded Nobel in Economics. New York Times. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/business/economy/13nobel.htmlGoogle Scholar
  97. Williamson, C. R. (2011). Civilizing Society. The Journal of Private Enterprised, 27, 99–120.Google Scholar
  98. Wagner, R. (forthcoming). Entangled Political Economy: A Keynote Address. Advances in Austrian Economics.Google Scholar
  99. Wagner, R. (2012a). Democracy and the Theory of Public Finance: A Polycentric, Invisible-Hand Framework. Public Finance and Management, 12, 298–315.Google Scholar
  100. Wagner, R. (2012b). Rationality, Political Economy, and Fiscal Responsibility: Wrestling with Tragedy on the Fiscal Commons. Constitutional Political Economy, 23, 261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wagner, R. (2009). Property, State, and Entangled Political Economy. In W. Schafer, A. Schneider, & T. Thomas (Eds.), Markets and Politics: Insights from a Political Economy Perspective. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  102. Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Fourteen years of monitoring community-managed forests: learning from IFRI’s experience. International Forestry Review, 9, 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Woo, E. (2012, June 13). Elinor Ostrom dies at 78; first woman to win Nobel in economics. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/13/local/la-me-elinor-ostrom-20120613Google Scholar
  104. Yan-Tang, Shui and E. Ostrom. (1993). The Governance and Management of Irrigation Systems: An Institutional Perspective. Irrigation Management Network Paper, 23. Available at http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/4589.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Boettke
    • 1
  • Jayme S. Lemke
    • 2
  • Liya Palagashvili
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Political Theory ProjectBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations