Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 123–137 | Cite as

Alienation and rationality—The retreat of postwar socialism

  • Petrik RunstEmail author
  • Steven Horwitz
Article
  • 453 Downloads

Abstract

Postwar socialist thought, such as the Frankfurt School, retreated from the Social Sciences due to its theoretical and empirical failures, as well as the discovery of Marx’ Paris Manuscripts. It shifted its emphasis away from exploitation. Instead, it dealt with human alienation in a prosperous world and other more philosophical concerns, such as the nature of rationality. We show that the Frankfurt School is not unique in dealing with these topics. The writings of F.A. Hayek, and, to a lesser extent, James Buchanan, focus on surprisingly similar observations but arrive at different conclusions. We also argue that the modern version of socialism is flawed.

Keywords

Frankfurt School Socialist thought Classical liberalism 

JEL codes

B13 B14 P11 

References

  1. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. 1944(1947). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., et al. (2011). 100 years of the American economic review: the top 20 articles. American Economic Review, 101(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brainerd, E. (2010). Reassessing the standard of living in the Soviet Union: an analysis using archival anthropometric data. The Journal of Economic History, 70, 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. (2005) Afraid to be free: Dependency as desideratum, Public Choice, 124:19–31Google Scholar
  5. Burzcak, T. A. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cumbers, A., & McMaster, R. (2010). Socialism, knowledge, the instrumental valuation principe and the enhancement of individual dignity. Economy and Society, 39(2), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fromm, E. 1965 (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1952a). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1952b). The sensory order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty vol. one. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. In A. Horkheimer (Ed.), Selected essays. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  14. Konner, M. (2010). The evolution of childhood. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levy, D., & Peart, S. (2011). Soviet growth and American textbooks: an endogenous past. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78(1–2), 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man—Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  17. Medvedev, Z. A. (1990). The environmental destruction of the Soviet Union. Ecologist, 20(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
  18. Morgan, B. (2001). The project of the Frankfurt School. Telos, 2001(119), 75–98.Google Scholar
  19. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Pollock, F. (1929) Die planwirtschaftlichen Versuche in der Sowjetunion (pp. 1917–1927), C. L. Hirschfeld: Leipzig.Google Scholar
  21. Pollock, F. (1975). Stadien des Kapitalismus. Beck.Google Scholar
  22. Pollock, F. (1978). State capitalism—Its possibilities and limitations. In The essential Frankfurt school reader. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Prychitko, D. L. (1994). Marxisms and market processes. In D. L. Prychitko & P. Boettke (Eds.), The Elgar companion of Austrian economics. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, P. C., & Stephenson, M. (1973). Marx’s theory of exchange, alienation, and crisis. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schroeder, G. (1991). The dismal fate of soviet-type economies: Mises was right. Cato Journal, 11, Spring/Summer.Google Scholar
  26. Shott, M. J. (1992). On recent trends in the anthropology of Forager: Kalahari revisionism and its archeological implication. Man, 27(4), 843–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, A. 1982 (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, V. (2003). Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics. American Economic Review, 93(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, E., et al. (2011). Wealth inequality in foraging, horticultural, patoral, and agricultural populations: a reply to Caldararo. Current Anthropolgy, 52(4), 579–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tucker, R. C. (1961). Philosophy and myth in Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. von Hayek, F. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. von Mises, L. (1920, 1935) Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth in (ed. F.A.Hayek) Collectivist Economic Planning (London: George Routledge & Sons)Google Scholar
  33. von Mises, L. 1947 (1920). Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Collectivist economic planning, critical studies on the possibilities of socialism. Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Wainwright, H. (1994). Arguments for a new left: Answering the free market right. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Wiggershaus, R. (1994). The Frankfurt School—Its history, theories and political significance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsInstitute for Small Business Economics, Göttingen (ifh)GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsSt. Lawrence UniversityCantonUSA

Personalised recommendations