The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 297–309 | Cite as

Balancing corporate culture: Grid-group and Austrian economics

Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: firstly to discuss the foundations of Grid-Group “Cultural Theory” and highlight the compatibility with Austrian economics, and secondly to apply this framework to the context of organisational culture. My claim is that “Corporate Cultural Theory” provides a rigorous and grounded social anthropological framework to take Austrian economics beyond its traditional uses and improve upon competing explanations of corporate culture.

Keywords

Corporate culture Cultural theory Institutions 

JEL Codes

B53 L22 M14 Z13 

References

  1. Adams, J. (1995). Risk Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agassi, J. (1960). Methodological individualism. The British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), 244–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agassi, J. (1975). Institutional individualism. The British Journal of Sociology, 26(2), 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aligica, P. D., & Evans, A. J. (2009). Thoughts experiments, counterfactuals, and comparative analysis. Review of Austrian Economics, 22(3), 225–239.Google Scholar
  5. Bloor, C., & Bloor, D. (1982). “Twenty industrial scientists: A preliminary exercise.” In M. Douglas (Ed.), Essays in the sociology of perception. Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. J. (1998). “Rational choice and human agency in economics and sociology: Exploring the Weber-Austrian connection.” In Giersch (Ed.), Merits and limits of markets. Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2005). Institutional stickiness and the new development economics. Journal of Organization and Behavior, 57, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulding, K. (1966). “The economics of knowledge and knowledge of economics.” American Economic Review 56.Google Scholar
  9. Bower, M. (1966). Will to manage. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Caulkins, D. D. (1999). Is Mary Douglas’s grid/group analysis useful for cross cultural research? Cross-Cultural Research, 33(1), 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, S. N. S. (1983). The contractual theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1983), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coughlin, R. M., & Lockhart, C. (1998). “Grid-group theory and political ideology: a consideration of their relative strengths and weaknesses.” Journal of Theoretical Politics.Google Scholar
  13. Cowen, T., & Parker, D. (1997). Markets in the firms: a market-process approach to management. Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  14. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2005). Organization development and change (8th ed.). USA: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  15. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Denison, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Organizational culture and effectiveness. Organizational Science, 6(2), 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas, M. (1996[1970]). Natural symbols. Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural Bias. Royal Anthropological Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Douglas, M. (1982). In the Active Voice. Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Douglas, M. (2005). “Grid and group, new developments” workshop on complexity and cultural theory in honour of Michael Thompson.Google Scholar
  23. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, A. J. (2007a). Subjectivist social change: The influence of culture and ideas on economic policy. George Mason University Dissertation.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, A. J. (2007b). “Reflections on Mary Douglas: institutions, rationality, and wisdom”. ama-gi, 8(1), 61–66.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, A. J. (2010). “Only individuals choose” In Boettke, P. J. (Ed.), Handbook in Austrian economics. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, A. J., & Wenzel, N. W. (2013). A framework for the study of firms as constitutional orders. Constitutional Political Economy, 24(1), 2–18.Google Scholar
  28. Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, M. (Eds.) (1997). Culture matters: Essays in honour of Aaron Wildavsky. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  29. Foss, N. J. (1994). The theory of the firm: the Austrians as precursors and critics of contemporary theory. Review of Austrian Economics, 7(1), 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frosdick, (2006). Risk and cultural theoryGoogle Scholar
  31. Geertz, C. (1973). “Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture” In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (1998). The character of a corporation. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  33. Gross, J. L., & Rayner, S. (1985). Measuring culture: A paradigm for the analysis of social organization. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law legislation and liberty: Vol. 1 rules and order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hendry, J. (1999). Cultural theory and contemporary management organization. Human Relations, 52(5), 557–577.Google Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Hollis, M. (1977). Models of man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Koch, C. G. (2007). The science of success: How market-based management built the world’s largest company. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  41. Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Maxwell Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Maesschalck, J. (2004). Research note: a method for applying cultural theory to the study of organisations. Innovation, 17(4), 377–386.Google Scholar
  43. Mamadouh, V. (1999). Grid-group cultural theory: an introduction. Geo Journal, 47(3), 395–409.Google Scholar
  44. Mars, G. (1982). Cheats at work: An anthropology of workplace crime counterpoint Google Scholar
  45. Moore, J. D. (1998). Visions of culture: An introduction to anthropological theories and theorists. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mises, L. v. (1998[1949]). Human action. Mises Institute: Alabama.Google Scholar
  47. Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2004). The information systems professional as a hermit. Innovation, 17(4), 289–323.Google Scholar
  48. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Peters, & Waterman. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  51. Sautet, F. (2000). An entrepreneurial theory of the Firm Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Schein, E. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  54. Thompson, M., & Schwartz, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  55. Verweij, M., and Thompson, M., (eds.) (2006) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESCP Europe Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations