The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 23–44 | Cite as

A subjectivist’s solution to the limits of public choice

Reasserting the Austrian foundations of subjectivist political economy
  • Anthony J. Evans


In light of Wittman (1995) and Caplan (2007) this paper contends that the rational-choice approach to political science (“Public Choice theory”) has reached a dead end. By critiquing their treatment of rationality, knowledge assumptions, and views of the democratic process, an alternative is presented based on the core insight of the “Epistemic Primacy Thesis”. This subjectivist approach to political economy is introduced in light of an existing debate between the compatibility (or otherwise) of Austrian economics and Public Choice theory.


Entrepreneurship Government failure Public choice Rational choice Subjectivism 

JEL Code

B52 B53 D83 H11 


  1. Aligica, P. D., & Evans, A. J. (2009). The neoliberal revolution in eastern Europe: Economic ideas in the transition from communism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S., (1976) The Economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition amongst pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, S. E., & Friedman, J. (2008). The irrelevance of economic theory to understanding economic ignorance. Critical Review, 20(3), 195–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boettke, P.J (1987) “Virginia political economy: a view from Vienna” Market Process, 5(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. J. (1994). The elgar companion to Austrian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boettke, P. J. (1995). Hayek’s the road to serfdom revisited: government failure in the argument against socialism. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. J. (1997). Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality. Critical Review, 11(1), 11–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. J., & Lopez, E. (2002). Austrian economics and public choice. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boettke, Peter J. and Peter T. Leeson. (2004) “An ‘Austrian’ perspective on public choice,” in The encyclopedia of public choice, 2 volumes, edited by Charles Rowley and Friedrich Schneider, Vol. 2: 27–32.Google Scholar
  11. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2007). Saving government failure theory from itself: recasting political economy from an Austrian perspective. Constitutional Political Economy, 18(2), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, J. M. (1954). Individual choice in voting and the market. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan, J. M. (1986). Liberty. Market and State New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Buchanan, J.M., (1989) “Shackle and a lecture in Pittsburgh” Market Process, 7 Spring: 2–4Google Scholar
  16. Buchanan J.M. (1990) “The Domain of Constitutional Economics,” Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), 1–18Google Scholar
  17. Buchanan, J.M., (1993) “How can constitutions be designed so that politicians who seek to serve “public interest” can survive and prosper?” Constitutional Political Economy 4, pp.1-6 [page reference taken from The collected works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 16: Choice, Contract and Constitutions, (2001) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund]Google Scholar
  18. Buchanan, J.M., (1996) “The Best of All Possible Worlds? New Efforts to Prove That Political Institutions Works as Well as Markets” Times Literary Supplement January 26, No. 4843, p. 13.Google Scholar
  19. Buchanan, J. M. (1999 [1969]). Cost and choice: An inquiry in economic theory. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  20. Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G., (2001[1962]) The Calculus of Consent University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (2002). Constitutional implications of radical subjectivism. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Busch, A., and Braun, D., (1999) Eds. Public Policy and Political Ideas Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  23. Caldwell, B. (1982). Beyond positivism: Economic methodology in the twentieth century. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Caplan, B. (2001a). What makes the public think like economists? evidence on economic cognition from the survey of americans and economists on the economy. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), 395–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Caplan, B. (2001b). Rational Irrationality and the microfoundations of political failure. Public Choice, 107(3/4), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Caplan, B. (2002). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of judgmental anomolies from the survey of americans and economists on the economy. Economic Journal, 112, 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Caplan, B. (2003). The idea trap: the political economy of growth divergence. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Caplan, B. (2005a). From Friedman to Wittman: the transformation of chicago political economy. Econ Journal Watch, 2(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  29. Caplan, B. (2005b). Rejoinder to: true myths. Econ Journal Watch, 2(2), 165–185.Google Scholar
  30. Caplan, B. (2007). The Myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Caplan, B., & Stringham, E. (2005). Mises, Bastiat, public opinion, and public choice. Review of Political Economy, 17(1), 79–105. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Congleton, R. D. (1986). Rent-seeking aspects of political advertising. Public Choice, 49(3), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Coyne, C.J., (2007) After War. Stanford California: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Delli Carpini, M., and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans know about politics and why it matters Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Demsetz, H., (1982) Economic, legal, and political dimensions of competition Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  36. Downs, A. (1957) An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
  37. Elster, J. (2007) Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Evans, A. J. (2009). Constitutional moments in eastern Europe and subjectivist political economy. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(2), 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans, A.J., and Friedman, J., (2011) “Search versus browse: a theory of error grounded in radical (not rational) ignorance” Critical Review, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedman, J. (2005) “Popper, Weber and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance” Critical review Vol 17. Nos. 1–2, pp.i-lviiiGoogle Scholar
  41. Hayek, F.A., (1948) Individualism and economic order Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Hayek, F. A. (1949). The intellectuals and socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review, 16(3).Google Scholar
  43. Hayek, F.A., (1977) “A free-market monetary system” Journal of Libertarian Studies, 3(1)Google Scholar
  44. Hazlitt, H. (1946) Economics in one lesson Harper & BrothersGoogle Scholar
  45. Holcombe, R. G. (2002). Political entrepreneurship and the democratic allocation of economic resources. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ikeda, S. (1997) Dynamics of the Mixed Economy: Toward a Theory of Interventionism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Ikeda, S. (2003). How compatible are public choice and Austrian political economy. Review of Austrian Economics, 16(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kelly, T., (2003) “Epistemic rationality as instrumental rationality: A Critique” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVI(3)Google Scholar
  49. Keynes, J.M. (1980). "Letter to F.A. Hayek dated 28 June 1944", In idem. Collected Works 27. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 387.Google Scholar
  50. Kindleberger, C.P., and Aliber, R.Z., (2005) Manias, panics and crashes: A history of financial crises, Palgrave Macmillan, 5th Ed.Google Scholar
  51. Kirzner, I., (2006) “Calculation, competition and entrepreneurship” in Jack High (ed) Humane Economics: Essays in Honour of Don Lavoie Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lachmann L. (1990), “G.L.S. Shackle’s place in the history of subjectivist thought”, in Frowen S.F. (ed.), Unknowledge and choice in economics: Proceedings of a conference in honour of G. L. S. Shackle, New York: St. Martin’s Press; pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  53. Lakatos, I., (1978) The Methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  54. Lavoie, D., (1985) Rivalry and central planning: The socialist calculation debate reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Lopez, E. J. (2002). The legislator as political entrepreneur: investment in political capital. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. MacKenzie, D. W. (2008). The use of knowledge about society. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(3–4), 678–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Martino, A. (2005). Ideas, interests, and leadership. Ama-Gi Vol., 7.Google Scholar
  58. McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mises, L. V. (1956). The anti-capitalistic mentality. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Co.Google Scholar
  60. Mises, L.v. (1998[1949]) Human action Ludwig von Mises InstituteGoogle Scholar
  61. Mueller, D. C. (1996) Constitutional Democracy, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Mueller, D., (2003) Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
  63. Olson, M. (1989) “How ideas affect societies: Is Britain the wave of the future?” in ideas, interests and consequences institute of economic affairsGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostrom, V., (1997) Meaning of democracy and the vulnerabilities of democracies: A response to tocqueville's challenge. Michigan: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Pasour, E. C. (1992). Economists and public policy: Chicago political economy versus conventional views. Public Choice, 74, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2004). Constitutions and economic policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Radford, R. A. (1945). The economic organization of a P.O.W. camp. Economica, 12(48), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodrik, D. (1996) “Understanding economic policy reform” Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 9–41Google Scholar
  69. Rowley, C.K. (1994) “Public choice economics” in Peter J. Boettke, (ed) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics Brookfield, VT” Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  70. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  71. Simons, H.C., (1983) The Simon’s Syllabus center for the study of public choice, George Mason UniversityGoogle Scholar
  72. Sinn, S. (1992). The taming of Leviathan: competition among governments. Constitutional Political Economy, 3(2), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stigler, G. (1982) The economist as Preacher Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutter, D. (2002). “The democratic efficiency debate and definitions of political equilibrium. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tollison, R. D. (1989). Chicago political economy. Public Choice, 63, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vanberg, V. and Buchanan, J.M., (1989) “Interests and theories in constitutional choice” Journal of theoretical politics 1, p.49-62 [page reference taken from The collected works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 16: Choice, Contract and Constitutions, (2001) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund]Google Scholar
  78. Vanberg, V., and Buchanan, J.M., (1991) “Constitutional choice, Rational ignorance, and the limits of reason” Jahrbuch fur Neue Politische Okonomie 10 band pp.61–78 [page reference taken from The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Volume 16: Choice, Contract and Constitutions, (2001) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund]Google Scholar
  79. Vaughn, K.I., (1994) Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  80. Wagner, R.E. (1989) To Promote the general welfare Pacific Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  81. Wagner, R. E. (2003). Public choice and the diffusion of classic Italian public finance. Il Pensiero Economico, 11(1), 271–282.Google Scholar
  82. Wagner, R.E., (2004) “Public choice as an Academic Enterprise: Charlottesville, Blacksburg, and Fairfax Retrospectively Viewed” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 1,Google Scholar
  83. Weingast, Barry R. 1995. "The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market‐Preserving Federalism and Economic Development". Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(1) 1–3.Google Scholar
  84. Wiseman, J. (1990). Principles of political economy—an outline proposal, illustrated by applications to fiscal federalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 1, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wittman, D. A. (1989). Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1395–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wittman, D.A., (1995) The myth of democratic failure. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  87. Wittman, D. A. (2005a). Reply to caplan: on the methodology of testing for voter irrationality. Econ Journal Watch, 2(1), 22–31.Google Scholar
  88. Wittman, D. A. (2005b). Second reply to Caplan: the power and the glory of the median voter. Econ Journal Watch, 2(2), 186–195.Google Scholar
  89. Wohlgemuth, M. (1995). Economic and political competition in neoclassical and evolutionary perspective. Constitutional Political Economy, 6, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESCP EuropeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations