The idea of a kaleidic economy or society is strongly associated with George Shackle and his vision of Keynesian kaleidics. This essay asserts that the central thrust of the Austrian tradition in economic analysis can be described by the term Viennese kaleidics. In either version of kaleidics, the analytical stress is placed on treating time seriously and not just notionally. Either version of kaleidics leads to recognition that economic processes are better treated as turbulent than as equilibrated. While that turbulence is a natural feature of the unavoidable incompleteness of intertemporal coordination, it is subject to mitigation. This essay explains how it is that individual liberty and private ordering is generally superior to state policy and public ordering in calming the turbulence that naturally characterizes a kaleidic economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
In contrast to the Austrian critics of what they perceive to be the nihilism of kaleidics, Stephen Parsons (1993) argues that it is orthodox economics, with its readiness to embrace fictive models that give definitive answers to questions that is nihilistic. Warren Samuels (1993) notes that if the charge of nihilism is applied to any system of thought that leaves the future open, nihilism is superior to the alternative.
In their examination of the scholarly oeuvre of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom, Aligica and Boettke (2009) explain that the Ostroms sought to penetrate deeply into reality in contrast to the Walrasian-like posture of achieving separation from reality.
Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Challenging institutional analysis and development: The Bloomington School. London: Routledge.
Angello, R. J., & Donnelley, L. P. (1975). Property rights and efficiency in the oyster industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 521–533.
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Boettke, P. J. (2007). Liberty vs. power in economic policy in the 20th and 21st centuries. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22, 7–36.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. Chicago: Markham.
Clower, R. W. (1994). Economics as an inductive science. Southern Economic Journal, 60, 805–814.
Clower, R. W. (1995). Axiomatics in economics. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 307–319.
Clower, R. W., & Leijonhufvud, A. (1975). The coordination of economic activities: A Keynesian perspective. American Economic Review, Proceedings, 65, 182–188.
Gloria-Palermo, S. (1999). The evolution of Austrian economics: From Menger to Lachmann. London: Routledge.
Harrod, R. F. (1951). The life of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.
Hayek, F. A. (1932). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Ikeda, S. (1997). Dynamics of the mixed economy. London: Routledge.
Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. New York: Random House.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51, 209–223.
Koppl, R. (2001). Alfred Schütz and George Shackle: Two views of choice. Review of Austrian Economics, 14, 181–191.
Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley, CA: Glendessary Press.
Lachmann, L. M. (1976). From Mises to Shackle: An essay on Austrian economics and the Kaleidic society. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 54–62.
Leijonhufvud, A. (1968). On Keynesian economics and the economics of Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leijonhufvud, A. (1981). Information and coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Menger, C. (1871 ). Principles of economics. New York: New York University Press.
Menger, C. (1883 ). Investigations into the method of the social sciences. New York: New York University Press.
Moyo, D. (2011). How the West Was Lost. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
O’Driscoll, J. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (1985). The economics of time and ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ostrom, V. (1996). Faustian bargains. Constitutional Political Economy, 7, 303–308.
Pantaleoni, M. (1911). Considerazioni sulle proprieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti, 42(9–29), 114–133.
Parsons, S. D. (1993). Shackle, Nihilism, and the subject of economics. Review of Political Economy, 5, 217–235.
Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: An inquiry into values. New York: William Morrow.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Read, L. (1958). I, Pencil. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.
Rothbard, M. N. (1990). The hermeneutical invasion of philosophy and economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 3, 45–59.
Salerno, J. T. (2002). The Rebirth of Austrian economics—In light of Austrian economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5, 111–128.
Samuels, W. J. (1993). In (Limited but Affirmative) defense of Nihilism. Review of Political Economy, 5, 236–244.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics & economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1974). Keynesian Kaleidics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
von Mises, L. (1966). Human action (3rd ed.). Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action: Time and knowledge in a theory of social economy. London: Routledge.
Wagner, R. E. (2012). Deficits, Debt, and Democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wagner, R.E. (2011). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.019.
Yeager, L. B. (1997). Austrian economics, neoclassicism, and the market test. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 153–165.
This is a revised text of my presidential address to the Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, Washington, DC, November 20, 2011. I’m grateful to Peter Boettke for offering helpful comments on an earlier version.
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, R.E. Viennese kaleidics: Why it’s liberty more than policy that calms turbulence. Rev Austrian Econ 25, 283–297 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-012-0172-x
- Kaleidic economy
- George Shackle
- Time and economics
- Monetary non-neutrality
- Private vs. public ordering