The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 283–297 | Cite as

Viennese kaleidics: Why it’s liberty more than policy that calms turbulence

Article

Abstract

The idea of a kaleidic economy or society is strongly associated with George Shackle and his vision of Keynesian kaleidics. This essay asserts that the central thrust of the Austrian tradition in economic analysis can be described by the term Viennese kaleidics. In either version of kaleidics, the analytical stress is placed on treating time seriously and not just notionally. Either version of kaleidics leads to recognition that economic processes are better treated as turbulent than as equilibrated. While that turbulence is a natural feature of the unavoidable incompleteness of intertemporal coordination, it is subject to mitigation. This essay explains how it is that individual liberty and private ordering is generally superior to state policy and public ordering in calming the turbulence that naturally characterizes a kaleidic economy.

Keywords

Kaleidic economy George Shackle Time and economics Monetary non-neutrality Private vs. public ordering 

JEL Codes

B20 D20 D80 E30 E52 E62 

References

  1. Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Challenging institutional analysis and development: The Bloomington School. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Angello, R. J., & Donnelley, L. P. (1975). Property rights and efficiency in the oyster industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Boettke, P. J. (2007). Liberty vs. power in economic policy in the 20th and 21st centuries. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22, 7–36.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
  7. Clower, R. W. (1994). Economics as an inductive science. Southern Economic Journal, 60, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clower, R. W. (1995). Axiomatics in economics. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clower, R. W., & Leijonhufvud, A. (1975). The coordination of economic activities: A Keynesian perspective. American Economic Review, Proceedings, 65, 182–188.Google Scholar
  10. Gloria-Palermo, S. (1999). The evolution of Austrian economics: From Menger to Lachmann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Harrod, R. F. (1951). The life of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. A. (1932). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  13. Ikeda, S. (1997). Dynamics of the mixed economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  16. Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koppl, R. (2001). Alfred Schütz and George Shackle: Two views of choice. Review of Austrian Economics, 14, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley, CA: Glendessary Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lachmann, L. M. (1976). From Mises to Shackle: An essay on Austrian economics and the Kaleidic society. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 54–62.Google Scholar
  20. Leijonhufvud, A. (1968). On Keynesian economics and the economics of Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Leijonhufvud, A. (1981). Information and coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  23. Menger, C. (1871 [1981]). Principles of economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Menger, C. (1883 [1985]). Investigations into the method of the social sciences. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moyo, D. (2011). How the West Was Lost. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  26. O’Driscoll, J. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (1985). The economics of time and ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Ostrom, V. (1996). Faustian bargains. Constitutional Political Economy, 7, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pantaleoni, M. (1911). Considerazioni sulle proprieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti, 42(9–29), 114–133.Google Scholar
  29. Parsons, S. D. (1993). Shackle, Nihilism, and the subject of economics. Review of Political Economy, 5, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: An inquiry into values. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  31. Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Read, L. (1958). I, Pencil. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
  33. Rothbard, M. N. (1990). The hermeneutical invasion of philosophy and economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 3, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salerno, J. T. (2002). The Rebirth of Austrian economics—In light of Austrian economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samuels, W. J. (1993). In (Limited but Affirmative) defense of Nihilism. Review of Political Economy, 5, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics & economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shackle, G. L. S. (1974). Keynesian Kaleidics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  38. von Mises, L. (1966). Human action (3rd ed.). Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action: Time and knowledge in a theory of social economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Wagner, R. E. (2012). Deficits, Debt, and Democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. Wagner, R.E. (2011). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.019.
  43. Yeager, L. B. (1997). Austrian economics, neoclassicism, and the market test. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, 3G4George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations