This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Backhouse, R. E. (2001). On the credentials of methodological pluralism. In J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis, & S. G. Medema (Eds.), Economics broadly considered: Essays in honor of Warren J. Samuels (pp. 161–181). London: Routledge.
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Boettke, P. J. (1994). Storytelling and the human sciences. In P. J. Boettke & D. L. Prychitko (Eds.), The market process: Essays in contemporary Austrian economics (pp. 179–186). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Boettke, P. J. (2004). Obituary: Don Lavoie (1950–2001). Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(3), 377–379.
Boettke, P. J. (2007). Methodological pluralism and the Austrian school of economics? http://austrianeconomists.typepad.com/weblog/2007/12/methodological.html. Accessed 18 November 2009.
Boettke, P. J. (this issue). Cultivating constructive discourse over economics and public policy. Review of Austrian Economics, 24 (issue), pages.
Buchanan, J. M. (1991). The economics and ethics of constitutional order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (2005). Why I, too, am not a conservative. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Caldwell, B. J. (1982). Beyond positivism: Economic methodology in the twentieth century. London: G. Allen.
Conant, J. B. (1956). The citadel of learning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Garnett, R. F., Jr. (this issue). Why should Austrian economists be pluralists? Review of Austrian Economics, 24 (issue), pages.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation, and liberty, volume I: Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. In W. W. Bartley III (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holcombe, R. G. (this issue). Pluralism and heterodoxy in economic methodology. Review of Austrian Economics, 24 (issue), pages.
Koppl, R. G. (2005). How to improve forensic science. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(3), 255–286.
Koppl, R. G. (this issue). Against representative agent methodology. Review of Austrian Economics, 24 (issue), pages.
Koppl, R., G., Kurzban, R., & Kobilinsky, L. (2008). Epistemics for forensics. Episteme, 5(2), 141–159.
McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
McCloskey, D. N. (1994). Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oakeshott, M. (1959). The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. London: Bowes and Bowes.
Peart, S. J., & Levy, D. M. (2005). The ‘vanity of the philosopher’: From equality to hierarchy in postclassical economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.
Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York: Harper.
Samuels, W. J. (1997). The case for methodological pluralism. In A. Salanti & E. Screpanti (Eds.), Pluralism in economics (pp. 67–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Walstad, A. (2001). On science as a free market. Perspectives on Science, 9(3), 324–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garnett, R.F. Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe. Rev Austrian Econ 24, 71–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4