The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 19–28 | Cite as

Illustrating the importance of Austrian business cycle theory: A reply to Murphy, Barnett, and Block; A call for quantitative study

Article

Abstract

Murphy et al. (2009) criticize Young’s (2005) test of Austrian business cycle theory (ABCT) using US industry-level quarterly job reallocation data and the federal funds rate as a monetary policy indicator. I argue that not only are Murphy et al.’s specific criticisms misguided; more importantly, they all but completely rule out the type of empirical study that Young (2005) advocates: specifically, one that (1) is quantitative and distinguishes between statistical and economic significance and (2) attempts to exploit a hypothesis that is both a prediction of ABCT and not a prediction of competing monetary theories of the cycle. I argue that empirical studies embodying (1) and (2) are critical to ABCT as a research program. Furthermore, I review the existing econometric studies of ABCT from the last 10 years and conclude that there is much room for improvement along these lines.

Keywords

Austrian business cycle theory Econometric methodology 

JEL Codes

E51 C23 

References

  1. Bismans, F., & Mougeot, C. (2009). Austrian business cycle theory: Empirical evidence. Review of Austrian Economics, 22(3), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callahan, G., & Garrison, R. (2003). Does Austrian business cycle theory help explain the dot-com boom and bust? Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(2), 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cwik, P. (1998). The recession of 1990: A comment. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, S. J., Faberman, J., & Haltiwanger, J. (2006). The flow approach to labor markets: New data sources and micro-macro links. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. C. (1996). On the driving forces behind cyclical movement, in employment and job reallocation employment fluctuations. NBER Working Paper, p. 5775.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. C. (2001). Sectoral job creation and destruction responses to oil price changes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 48(3), 465–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C., & Schuh, S. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Garrison, R. W. (1985). Intertemporal coordination and the invisible hand: An Austrian perspective on the Keynesian vision. History of Political Economy, 17(2), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrison, R. W. (2001). Time and money: The macroeconomics of capital structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1933). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1935). Prices and production. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  12. Hugues, A. (1997). The recession of 1990: An Austrian explanation. Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keeler, J. P. (2001). Empirical evidence of the Austrian business cycle theory. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(4), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Roux, P., & Levin, M. (1998). The capital structure and the business cycle: Some tests of the validity of the Austrian business cycle in South Africa. Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 22(3), 91–109.Google Scholar
  15. McCloskey, D. N., & Ziliak, S. T. (1996). The standard error of regressions. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 97–114.Google Scholar
  16. Mises, L. von. (1912). The theory of money and credit. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mulligan, R. F. (2002). A Hayekian analysis of the term structure of production. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulligan, R. F. (2005). The Austrian business cycle: A vector error-correction model with commercial and industrial loans. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1), 51–91.Google Scholar
  19. Mulligan, R. F. (2006). An empirical examination of Austrian business theory. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9(2), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Powell, B. (2002). Explaining Japan’s recession. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prescott, E. C. (2006). Nobel lecture: The transformation of macroeconomic policy and research. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sechrest, L. (2009). Evidence regarding the structure of production: An approach to Austrian business cycle theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, in press.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, R. P., Barnett, W., II, & Block, W. (2009). Testing Austrian business cycle theory? A rejoinder to Andrew Young. Journal of Business and Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 73–86.Google Scholar
  24. Young, A. T. (2005). Reallocating labor to initiate changes in capital structures. Economics Letters, 89(3), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations