Skip to main content
Log in

Thought experiments, counterfactuals and comparative analysis

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the problem of “thought experiments” in Austrian economics and takes as a starting point Lawrence Moss’ argument on the divide between the older Austrian economists—for whom thought experiments were crucial—and the new generation that, in Moss’ view, has “abandoned” such methods. The article is an attempt not only to bridge this alleged divide but also to contribute to the development of the Austrian methodology. It is argued that what may be perceived as “abandonment” bolsters rather than precludes the role of thought experiments in the Austrian paradigm. The article identifies an entire family of comparative and counterfactual analysis research strategies available to the Austrians, all enjoying a solid epistemological and methodological grounding. The “comparative-counterfactual analytics” pattern threads together the conjectural histories, spontaneous orders and empirical case studies of the contemporary Austrians, with the classic tradition of older works. Consequently, the recent evolution of Austrian scholarship should not be seen as an aberration or abandonment but as a deliberate, natural and commendable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This affinity is amplified if the role of knowledge is taken seriously, as the Austrians insist. One of the first implications is that it is hard to measure or assess “knowledge” outside of specific contexts and configurations, and therefore, analysis of social change in the light of knowledge processes is a fundamental challenge to quantitative approaches. The comparison of variables that have become disconnected from their context and relationship with human action present a mechanical view of the economy and a mechanical view of theory. If knowledge is treated as being locally generated, and dispersed, the picture portrayed via quantitative data and variable thinking will be incomplete. In short, a variable approach may be in many cases methodologically misguided, and also in most cases, its results will fail to capture in a constructive way the phenomena of interest.

  2. “We can avoid counterfactuals only if we eschew all causal inference and limit ourselves to strictly noncausal narratives of what actually happened (no smuggling in causal claims under the guise of verbs such as “influenced”, “responded”, “triggered”, “precipitated” and the like). Putting to the side whether any coherent and compelling narrative can be “noncausal”, this prohibition would prevent us from drawing the sorts of “lessons from history” that scholars and policy makers regularly draw on such topical topics as the best ways to encourage economic growth, to preserve peace and to cultivate democracy. Without counterfactual reasoning, how could we know whether state intervention accelerated growth in country x, whether deterrence prevented an attack on country y, or whether the courage of a young king saved country z from sliding back into dictatorship? Counterfactual reasoning is a prerequisite for any form of learning from history” (Tetlock and Belkin 1996).

References

  • Adams, G. R., & Schvaneneldt, J. D. (1991). Understanding research methods. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat, F. (1850). That which is seen, and that which is not seen” in selected essays on political economy. Princeton, N. J.: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L., & Weingast, B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L., & Weingast, B. R. (2000). The analytic narrative project. The American Political Science Review, 94, 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulier, S. (2003). Explaining Botswana’s success: the important role of post-colonial policy. Cato Journal, 23(2), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1993). Why perestroika failed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Prychitko, D. L. (1994). The future of Austrian economies. In: The market process: Essays in contemporary austrian economics. Aldershot:Edward Elgar.

  • Coase, R. (1959). The federal communication commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & Fink, R. (1985). Inconsistent equilibrium constructs: the evenly rotating economy of Mises and Rothbard. American Economic Review, 75, 866–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, C., & Leeson, P. (2004). Read all about it! understanding the role of media in economic development. Kyklos, 57, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2005). Self-enforcing arrangements in african political economy. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 57(2), 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1892). On the origins of money. The Economic Journal, 2, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1843/1900). A system of logic. London; New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L. S. (1997). Austrian economics and the abandonment of the classic thought experiment. In: Keizer, W., Tieben, B., & van Zijp, R. (Eds.), Austrian economics in debate. Routledge.

  • Powell, B. (2002). Explaining Japan’s recession. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(2).

  • Powell, B. (2003). Economic freedom and growth: the case of the celtic tiger. Cato Journal, 22(3).

  • Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2004). Between complexity and parsimony. Arizona: CQRM Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. N. (1963). America’s great depression. New York City: Richardson & Snyder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, V. K. (2004). Enterprising slaves & master pirates: Understanding economic life in the bahamas, Peter Lang.

  • Stringham, E. (2002). The extralegal development of securities trading in seventeenth century Amsterdam. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43(2), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringham, E. (2003). The emergence of the London stock exchange as a self-policing club. Journal of Private Enterprise, 17(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Dragos Aligica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aligica, P.D., Evans, A.J. Thought experiments, counterfactuals and comparative analysis. Rev Austrian Econ 22, 225–239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0082-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0082-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation