Skip to main content
Log in

Elections as takeover bids: Some agonistics concerning good government

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agency theory has been widely applied to the governance of business corporations and to good advantage. The formal framework of agency theory pertains as well to polities, wherein citizens are the principals and politicians the agents. Where takeover efforts occur irregularly for corporations, they occur at regular intervals through elections for polities. Timothy Besley’s Principled Agents uses the agency theory to argue that electoral competition will generally select competent and public-spirited politicians. This claim follows from his formal framework, but that framework ignores some questionable and unsettled matters that challenge Besley’s relatively roseate view of the qualitative character of electoral selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2006). Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (2005). Self-deception as the root of political failure. Public Choice, 124, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelo, H. (1981). Competition and unanimity. American Economic Review, 71, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankowski, L. (1983). Competition and unanimity revisited. American Economic Review, 73, 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society: A treatise on general sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1986). The agent-principal relationship in the public sector. In K. Brunner (Ed.), The Growth of Government (pp. 37–53). Rochester: Center for Research in Government Policy and Business, University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1988). Agency, economic calculation, and constitutional construction. In C. K. Rowley, R. D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), The Political Economy of Rent Seeking (pp. 423–445). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, R.E. Elections as takeover bids: Some agonistics concerning good government. Rev Austrian Econ 22, 145–150 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0077-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0077-5

Keywords

JEL Codes

Navigation