Skip to main content
Log in

Disagreement over the emergence of private property rights: alternative meanings, alternative explanations

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an exercise in the history of thought, which compares Austrian and neoclassical theories of the emergence of private property rights, and examines, in part, the extent to which Austrians can be said to offer a commonly-agreed upon explanation that parallels Carl Menger's exemplary story of the emergence of money. We address the sources of disagreement (and apparent conflict) among emergence theorists in both schools. We try to show that some of the disagreement hinges on an unclear meaning of the term “emergence,” which is resolvable, while other sources of disagreement are fundamental at the methodological level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. (1950) “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (3): 211–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. (1991) “The Race for Property Rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 33 (April): 177–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. and Hill, P. J. (1983) “Privatizing the Commons: An Improvement?” Southern Economic Journal 50(2): 438–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. and Hill, P. J. (1975) “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West.” Journal of Law and Economics 18(1): 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1997 [1989]) Economic Analysis of Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1992) “Approximate Optimality of Aboriginal Rights.” Journal of Law & Economics 35 (April): 183–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm-Bawerk, E. (1962 [1881]) Shorter Classics of Boehm-Bawerk. Spring Mills, PA: Libertarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. (2001 [1996]) “Why Culture Matters: Economics, Politics, and the Imprint of History” In: Boettke, P. (Ed.) Calculation and Coordination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P., Coyne, C. and Leeson, P. (2003) “The Indigenous Path to Progress: Institutional Stickiness and the Failure of Development Economics.” Working Paper (George Mason University: Fairfax, VA).

  • Buchanan, J. (1999 [1975]) The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967) “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” American EconomicReview 57 (2): 347–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. (1990) Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K. and Foss, N. (2002) “Organizing Economic Experiments: Property Rights and Firm Organization.” Review of Austrian Economics15(4): 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1988) Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. In: Bartley III, W.W. (Ed.) The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1983) “Our Moral Heritage,” In: Hayek, F.A. (Ed.) Knowledge, Evolution, and Society. London: ASI (Research).

  • Hayek, F. A. (1983) “Scientism and Socialism,” In: Hayek, F.A. (Ed.) Knowledge, Evolution, and Society. London: ASI (Research).

  • Hayek, F. A. (1973) Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1991) “Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution: An Evaluation in Light of Vanberg's Critique.” Economics and Philosophy 7:67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. (1996) “Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.” American Economic Review (June): 653–660.

  • Hume, D. (1985 [1739–1740]) A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (2003) The Truth About Markets: Their Genius, Their Limits, Their Follies. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1964 [1844]) The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., and Smith, V. (2003) “Positive Reciprocity and Intentions in Trust Games.” George Mason University (Fairfax, VA): Working Paper.

  • McManus, J. (1972) “An Economic Analysis of Indian Behavior in the North American Fur Trade.” Journal of Economic History 32: 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • M, Carl. (1994 [1871]) Principles of Economics. Grove City, PA: Libertarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • M, Carl. (1963 [1883]) Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1996 [1949]) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics,4th ed. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.

  • Mises, L. (1985 [1962]). Liberalism: The Classical Tradition. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: The Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1981 [1936]) Socialism. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1978 [1962]) The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Kansas City: Sheed

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1969 [1957]) Theory and History. Westport, CT: Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich, S. (1972) “Towards an Economic Theory of the Creation and Specification of Property Rights.” Review of Social Economy30: 309–25.

  • Polanyi, K. (1971) Primitive, Archaic, and Modern Economies. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1980). “A Theory of Primitive Society, with Special Reference to Law.” Journal of Law & Economics 23(1): 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1996). The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1995). Philosophy of Social Science, 2nded. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Samuels, W. (1999) “Hayek from the Perspective of an Institutionalist Historian of Economic Thought: An Interpretive Essay,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines9(2/3): 279–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. (2000) “An Essay on the Unmagic of Norms and Rules and of Markets.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 10(2/3).

  • Sen, A. (1977). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (2001). “Mind, Reciprocity, and Markets in the Laboratory.” Wirtschaft 10: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1986) “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F. A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, D. G. (1998) “Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems.” Constitutional Political Economy 9 (1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zywicki, T. (2000) “Was Hayek Right About Group Selection After All? Review Essay of Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, by Elliott Sober and David Sloan Wilson.” Review of Austrian Economics 13(1): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott A. Beaulier.

Additional information

JEL Code B25, E40, E53

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beaulier, S.A., Prychitko, D.L. Disagreement over the emergence of private property rights: alternative meanings, alternative explanations. Rev Austrian Econ 19, 47–68 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-6093-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-6093-9

Keywords

Navigation