Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Sync Working Group response-shift

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sprangers, M. A. G., Sajobi, T., Vanier, A., Mayo, N. E., Sawatzky, R., Lix, L. M., Oort, F. J., Sébille, V., & Response Shift—in Sync Working Group. (2021). Response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures: A commentary to The Response Shift-in Sync Working Group initiative. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02747-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanier, A., Oort, F. J., McClimans, L., Ow, N., Gulek, B. G., Böhnke, J. R., Sprangers, M., Sébille, V., Mayo, N., & Response Shift—in Sync Working Group. (2021). Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: Definition, theory, and a revised model. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02846-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sebille, V., Lix, L. M., Ayilara, O. F., Sajobi, T. T., Janssens, A. C. J. W., Sawatzky, R., Sprangers, M. A. G., Verdam, M. G. E., & Response Shift—in Sync Working Group. (2021). Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz, C. E., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2009). Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: Response shift phenomena. The Spine Journal, 9(12), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sawatzky, R., Kwon, J. Y., Barclay, R., Chauhan, C., Frank, L., van den Hout, W. B., Nielsen, L. K., Nolte, S., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Response Shift—in Sync Working Group. (2021). Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02766-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, P. A., Carreon, L. Y., & Glassman, S. D. (2009). Response shift phenomenon. Does this apply to spine outcomes research? The Spine Journal, 9(12), 1037–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Finkelstein, J. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (2019). Patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery: Past, current, and future directions. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 31(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.SPINE18770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Richard L. Skolasky

Authors
  1. Richard L. Skolasky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Skolasky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skolasky, R.L. In Sync Working Group response-shift. Qual Life Res 30, 3363–3364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03005-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03005-x

Search

Navigation