Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyse patients’ perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract and analyse the values of their measurement properties.

Methods

Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test–retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness.

Results

The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQ-UMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties.

Conclusion

According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data transparency.

References

  1. Singh, R., Kishore, L., & Kaur, N. (2014). Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Current perspective and future directions. Pharmacological Research. 80, 21–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faruque, L. I., Wiebe, N., Ehteshami-Afshar, A., Liu, Y., Dianati-Maleki, N., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Manns, B. J., & Tonelli, M. (2017). Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. CMAJ, 189(9), E341–E364. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Salvo, P., Calisi, N., Melai, B., Dini, V., Paoletti, C., Lomonaco, T., Pucci, A., Di Francesco, F., Piaggesi, A., & Romanelli, M. (2017). Temperature-and pH-sensitive wearable materials for monitoring foot ulcers. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 12, 949.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87(1), 4–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pérez-Panero, A. J., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., & Gónzalez-Sánchez, M. (2019). Prevention, assessment, diagnosis and management of diabetic foot based on clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore), 98(35), e16877.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Melmed, S., Polonsky, K. S., Larsen, P. R., & Kronenberg, H. M. (2015). Williams textbook of endocrinology (13th ed.). . Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lepäntalo, M., Apelqvist, J., Setacci, C., Ricco, J. B., De Donato, G., Becker, F., Robert-Ebadi, H., Cao, P., Eckstein, H. H., De Rango, P., & Diehm, N. (2011). Chapter V: diabetic foot. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery., 42, S60-74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Driver, V. R., Fabbi, M., Lavery, L. A., & Gibbons, G. (2010). The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 52(3 Suppl), 17S-22S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Diabetes Federation. Clinical Practice Recommendation on the Diabetic Foot: A guide for health care professionals. International Diabetes Federation, 2017

  10. Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., & González-Sánchez, M. (2014). Ability to discriminate between healthy and low back pain sufferers using ultrasound during maximum lumbar extension. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(6), 1093–1099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. González-Sánchez, M., Velasco-Ramos, E., Muñoz, M. R., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2016). Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study. J Foot Ankle Res., 9, 49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology., 62(10), e1-34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chin, Y.-F., & Huang, T.-T. (2013). Development and validation of a diabetes foot self-care behavior scale. Journal of Nursing Research., 21(1), 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bann, C. M., Fehnel, S. E., & Gagnon, D. D. (2003). Development and validation of the diabetic foot ulcer scale???Short form (DFS-SF). PharmacoEconomics, 21(17), 1277–1290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kontodimopoulos, N., Veniou, A., Tentolouris, N., & Niakas, D. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the diabetic foot ulcer scale—short form (DFS-SF). Hormones (Athens, Greece), 15(3), 394–403.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macioch, T., Sobol, E., Krakowiecki, A., Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska, B., Kasprowicz, M., & Hermanowski, T. (2017). Health related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulceration—translation and Polish adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale short form. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui, L. F., Yee-Tak Fong, D., Yam, M., & Yuk, I. W. (2008). Translation and validation of the Chinese diabetic foot ulcer scale—short form. Patient., 1(2), 137–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, Y.-N. (2019). Translation and validation of the Korean version of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form. International Wound Journal, 16(Suppl 1), 3–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Abetz, L., Sutton, M., Brady, L., McNulty, P., & Gagnon, D. D. (2002). The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale (DFS): A quality of life instrument for use in clinical trials. Practical Diabetes International., 19(6), 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin, R. L., Hutt, D. M., & Wukich, D. K. (2009). Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot & Ankle International., 30(4), 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cervera-Garvi, P., Ortega-Avila, A. B., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Cervera-Marin, J. A., Martin, R. R., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp). J Foot Ankle Res., 10, 39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Çelik, D., Malkoç, M., & Martin, R. (2016). Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Rheumatology International, 36(10), 1469–1476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Borloz, S., Crevoisier, X., Deriaz, O., Ballabeni, P., Martin, R. L., & Luthi, F. (2011). Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders., 12(1), 40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Uematsu, D., Suzuki, H., Sasaki, S., Nagano, Y., Shinozuka, N., Sunagawa, N., & Fukubayashi, T. (2015). Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Journal of Athletic Training, 50(1), 65–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. González-Sánchez, M., Li, G. Z., Ruiz Muñoz, M., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2017). Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(21), 2182–2189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mazaheri, M., Salavati, M., Negahban, H., Sohani, S. M., Taghizadeh, F., Feizi, A., et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage., 18(6), 755–759.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sartorio, F., Vercelli, S., Bravini, E., Bargeri, S., Moroso, M., Plebani, G., & Ferriero, G. (2014). Foot and ankle ability measure: Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL). Medicina del Lavoro, 105, 357–365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moreira, T. S., de Magalhães, L. C., Silva, R. D., Martin, R. L., & de Resende, M. A. (2016). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(25), 2479–2490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weel, H., Zwiers, R., Azim, D., Sierevelt, I. N., Haverkamp, D., van Dijk, C. N., et al. (2016). Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle ability measure. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 24(4), 1348–1354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arunakul, M., Arunakul, P., Suesiritumrong, C., Angthong, C., & Chernchujit, B. (2015). Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) subjective form. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 98(6), 561–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nauck, T., & Lohrer, H. (2011). Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. British Journal of Sports Medicine., 45(10), 785–790.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Navarro-Flores, E., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Cervera-Marín, J. A., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2015). Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA). Journal of Tissue Viability., 24(1), 24–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia-Paya, I., Lescure, Y., Delacroix, S., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2019). Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the French Version of the Diabetic Foot Self-care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 109(5), 357–366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kateel, R., Augustine, A. J., Ullal, S., Prabhu, S., Bhat, R., & Adhikari, P. (2017). Development and validation of health related quality of life questionnaire (Indian scenario) in diabetic foot ulcer patients. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 11, S651–S653.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vileikyte, L., Gonzalez, J. S., Leventhal, H., Peyrot, M. F., Rubin, R. R., Garrow, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., Cavanagh, P. R., & Boulton, A. J. (2006). Patient Interpretation of Neuropathy (PIN) Questionnaire: An instrument for assessment of cognitive and emotional factors associated with foot self-care. Diabetes Care, 29(12), 2617–2624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dhawan, V., Spratt, K. F., Pinzur, M. S., Baumhauer, J., Rudicel, S., & Saltzman, C. L. (2005). Reliability of AOFAS Diabetic Foot Questionnaire in Charcot Arthropathy: Stability, Internal Consistency, and Measurable Difference. Foot & Ankle International., 26(9), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kostuj, T., Krummenauer, F., Schaper, K., Stief, F., Zettersten, K., Baums, M. H., Meurer, A., & Lieske, S. (2014). Analysis of agreement between the German translation of the American Foot and Ankle Society’s Ankle and Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) and the Foot Function Index in its validated German translation by Naal et al. (FFI-D). Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery., 134(9), 1205–1210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Lieshout, E. M., De Boer, A. S., Meuffels, D. E., Den Hoed, P. T., Van der Vlies, C. H., Tuinebreijer, W. E., & Verhofstad, M. H. (2017). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: A study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. British Medical Journal Open, 7(2), e012884.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sayyed-Hosseinian, S. H., Hassankhani, G. G., Bagheri, F., Alavi, N., Shojaie, B., & Mousavian, A. (2018). Validation of the Persian version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) Questionnaire. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 233, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Analay Akbaba, Y., Celik, D., & Ogut, R. T. (2016). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of Turkish version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 55(6), 1139–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rodrigues, R. C., Masiero, D., Mizusaki, J. M., Imoto, A. M., Peccin, M. S., Cohen, M., & Alloza, J. F. M. (2008). Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação do" American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale". Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 16(2), 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ahn, J., Del Core, M. A., Wukich, D. K., Liu, G. T., Lalli, T., VanPelt, M. D., & Raspovic, K. M. (2018). Scoring Mental Health Quality of Life with the SF-36 in patients with and without Diabetes Foot complications. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 17(1), 30–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bagheri, Z., Jafari, P., Mahmoodi, M., & Dabbaghmanesh, M. H. (2017). Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis. Quality of Life Research, 26(4), 835–845.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Palomo-López, P., Losa-Iglesias, M. E., Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R., López-López, D., Rodríguez-Sanz, D., Romero-Morales, C., & Calvo-Lobo, C. (2019). Specific foot health-related quality-of-life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes. International Wound Journal, 16(1), 47–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferreira, A. F. B., Laurindo, I. M. M., Rodrigues, P. T., Ferraz, M. B., Kowalski, S. C., & Tanaka, C. (2008). Brazilian version of the foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ-BR): cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of measurement properties. Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil), 63(5), 595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cuesta-Vargas, A., Bennett, P., Jimenez-Cebrian, A. M., & Labajos-Manzanares, M. T. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1739–1743.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vileikyte, L., Peyrot, M., Bundy, C., Rubin, R. R., Leventhal, H., Mora, P., Shaw, J. E., Baker, P., & Boulton, A. J. (2003). The development and validation of a neuropathy- and Foot Ulcer—Specific. Diabetes Care, 26, 2549–2555. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.9.2549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Victorson, D., Cavazos, J. E., Holmes, G. L., Reder, A. T., Wojna, V., Nowinski, C., Miller, D., Buono, S., Mueller, A., Moy, C., et al. (2015). Validity of the Neurology Quality-of-Life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 31, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xie, G., Chen, L., Yang, S., Tao, J., Chan, C. C. H., Heinemann, A. W., Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Correia, H., & Wong, A. W. K. (2018). Simplified Chinese translation of 13 adult item banks from the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) . BMC Health Services Research, 18, 825. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3631-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Xavier, A. T., Foss, M. C., Marques Junior, W., dos Santos, C. B., Onofre, P. T. B. N., Pace, A. E. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Neuropathy- and Foot Ulcer—Specific Quality of Life instrument (NeuroQol) for Brazilian Portuguese—Phase 1. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2011;19:1352–1361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692011000600011.

  53. Bergin, S. M., Brand, C. A., Colman, P. G., & Campbell, D. A. (2009). A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): Construction and validation. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 2, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Castillo-Tandazo, W., Flores-Fortty, A., Feraud, L., & Tettamanti, D. (2013). Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD). Vascular Health and Risk Management, 9, 501.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Campo-Arias, A., Oviedo, H.C. Propiedades Psicométricas de una Escala: la Consistencia Interna. Rev salud pública [Internet]. 2008; 10(5). Available online: Retrieved 10 May, 2020, fromhttp://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-0642008000500015&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  57. Anguita, J. C., Labrador, J. R., Campos, J. D., Casas Anguita, J., Repullo Labrador, J., & Donado Campos, J. (2003). La encuesta como técnica de investigación. Elaboración de cuestionarios y tratamiento estadístico de los datos (I). Atención primaria31(8), 527-538

  58. Stetson, B., Schlundt, D., Rothschild, C., Floyd, J. E., Rogers, W., & Mokshagundam, S. P. (2011). Development and validation of the personal diabetes questionnaire (PDQ): A measure of diabetes self-care behaviors, perceptions and barriers. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 91(3), 321–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ortega-Avila, A. B., Cervera-Garvi, P., Ramos-Petersen, L., Chicharro-Luna, E., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2019). Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with diabetes mellitus associated with foot and ankle pathologies: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020146

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, J., Lee, E. H., Chae, D., & Kim, C. J. (2020). Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 105, 103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Skovlund, S. E., Lichtenberg, T. H., Hessler, D., & Ejskjaer, N. (2019). Can the routine use of Patient-reported outcome measures improve the delivery of person-centered diabetes care? A Review of recent developments and a case study. Current Diabetes Reports, 19(9), 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1190-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, Y. T., Tan, Y. Z., Cheen, M., & Wee, H. L. (2019). Patient-reported outcome measures in registry-based studies of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review. Current Diabetes Reports, 19(11), 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1265-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fernández-Torres, R., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Pérez-Panero, A. J., García-Romero, J., & Gónzalez-Sánchez, M. (2020). Instruments of choice for assessment and monitoring Diabetic Foot: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020602

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Fernández-Torres, R., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Pérez-Panero, A. J., García-Romero, J. C., & Gónzalez-Sánchez, M. (2020). Clinician assessment tools for patients with Diabetic Foot disease: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051487

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, MR-M and MG-S; Methodology, AJP-P; Validation, AJP-P and RF-T; Formal Analysis MR-M. and MG-S.; Investigation, MR-M. and MG-S; Resources, AJP-P and RF-T; Data analysis, RF-T. and AJP-P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, AJP-P; Writing—Review & Editing, MR-M and MG-S.; Visualization, CF and AG; Supervision CF and AG; Project Administration, CF and AG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Ruiz-Muñoz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

The authors declare their consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The authors declare their consent to publish this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Panero, A.J., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Fernández-Torres, R. et al. Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 30, 3395–3405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4

Keywords

Navigation