Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Mayo, D. G. (2018). Statistical inference as severe testing: How to get beyond the statistics wars (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107286184
Lakens, D. (2019). The value of preregistration for psychological science: A conceptual analysis. Japanese Psychological Review, 62(3), 221–230.
Scheel, A.M., Tiokhin L., Isager, P.M., & Lakens, D. (In Press). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vekpu
Hardwicke, T. E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Mapping the universe of registered reports. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0444-y
Funding
This work was funded by VIDI Grant No. 452-17-013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I am conducting and publishing meta-scientific research on Registered Reports in psychology.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheel, A.M. Registered Reports: a process to safeguard high-quality evidence. Qual Life Res 29, 3181–3182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02698-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02698-w