Skip to main content

Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Boehnke, J. R., & Rutherford, C. (2020). Registered Reports at “Quality of Life Research.” Quality of Life Research, 29(10), 2605–2607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke, P., Buckell, J., & Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to radically rethink peer review in Health Economics. Pharmacoecon Open, 4(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. White, K. (2019). Publications output: U.S. Trends and international comparisons. National Science Foundation.

  4. King, M., Dablander, F., Jakob, L., Agan, M. L. F., Huber, F., Haslbeck, J. M. B., et al. (2016). Registered Reports for student research. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambers, C. D. & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, present, and future. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Y. T. Fong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fong, D.Y.T., Osman, A.M.Y., Wang, H. et al. Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG. Qual Life Res 29, 3185–3186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02696-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02696-y