Skip to main content

Smart wearable devices as a psychological intervention for healthy lifestyle and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial

Quality of Life Research volume 30, pages 791–802 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Creating a healthy lifestyle is important across different life stages. Commercial smart wearable devices are an innovative and interesting approach as an early psychological intervention for modifying health-related behaviors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of smart wearable devices on health-promoting lifestyles and quality of life.

Methods

The study design was a three-parallel randomized controlled trial with a 3-month intervention. Two commercial smart wearable devices (smartwatches and smart bracelets) with different levels of complicated functions were applied as a psychological intervention in comparison with a smartphone app as the control group. Participants were healthy young adults with a median age of 26 years. Outcome measurements were conducted by self-administered questionnaires. Chi-square tests and ANOVA were performed for testing the difference of participants at baseline, and generalized estimating equations were performed for testing the effect of the intervention.

Results

At the beginning, 81 participants were recruited and 73 participants completed the study. Results of a healthy lifestyle demonstrated significant group effects of exercise and a significant effect of the interaction for self-actualization and stress management in the experimental group with a smartwatch (Self-actualization: MD = 0.35[− 0.10,0.80]; Exercise: MD = 0.21[− 0.33 0.75]; Stress management: MD = 0.36[− 0.04,0.76]) by comparing with only using mobile app (Self-actualization: MD =  − 0.03[− 0.25,0.18]; Exercise: MD =  − 0.12[− 0.38,0.14]; Stress management, MD =  − 0.28[− 0.55,0.00]). The significant effect of group-by-time interaction for self-actualization was found in the experimental group with a smart bracelet (MD = 0.05[− 0.30,0.20]) by comparing with the control group. The GEE-adjusted model indicated significant effects of the interaction on the comprehensive, physical, and mental quality of life in the experimental group with the smartwatch (Comprehensive: MD = 0.24[− 0.04,0.52]; Physical: MD = 0.67[0.26,1.09]; Mental: MD = 0.72[0.29,1.16]) by comparing with the control group (Comprehensive: MD =  − 1.57[− 2.55, − 0.59]; Physical: MD = 0.25[0.00,0.50]; Mental: MD = 0.08[− 0.11,0.27]).

Conclusion

From a psychological perspective, smart wearable devices have potential benefits of shaping a healthy lifestyle and improving the quality of life. Enhancing the utility of commercial well-designed smart wearable devices is an innovative and effective strategy for promoting public health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2018). Noncommunicable diseases. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases

  2. Hunter, D. J., & Reddy, K. S. (2013). Noncommunicable Diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369(14), 1336–1343. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1109345

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher, C., Ryan, J., Ambrosi, C., & Edney, S. (2017). Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4888-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016). Wearable devices and smartphones for activity tracking among people with serious mental illness. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 10, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2016.02.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wadden, T. A., Tronieri, J. S., & Butryn, M. L. (2020). Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults. The American psychologist, 75(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakicic, J. M., Davis, K. K., Rogers, R. J., King, W. C., Marcus, M. D., Helsel, D., & Belle, S. H. (2016). Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: The IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 316(11), 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arigo, D. (2015). Promoting physical activity among women using wearable technology and online social connectivity: a feasibility study. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 3(1), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2015.1118350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, F. (2019). Continued use of wearables for wellbeing with a cultural probe*. Service Industries Journal, 39(15–16), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1504924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gualtieri, L., Rosenbluth, S., & Phillips, J. (2016). Can a Free Wearable Activity Tracker Change Behavior? The Impact of Trackers on Adults in a Physician-Led Wellness Group. JMIR Research Protocols, 5(4), e237. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6534

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, Q., Sum, K., & Nathan-Roberts, D. (2016). How Fitness trackers facilitate health behavior change. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2014, 1067–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen, D., Zhang, X., Liu, X., & Lei, J. (2017). Evaluating the consistency of current mainstream wearable devices in health monitoring: A comparison under free-living conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013). Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. General Hospital Psychiatry, 35(4), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cadmus-Bertram, L. A., Marcus, B. H., Patterson, R. E., Parker, B. A., & Morey, B. L. (2015). Randomized Trial of a Fitbit-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 414–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Neaţu, A. M. (2015). Public health and behavioral economics nudging behaviors through wearables. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 5(5), 518–526.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Riley, W. T., Brown, C. H., Cuijpers, P., Duan, N., & Cheung, K. (2015). Trials of intervention principles: Evaluation methods for evolving behavioral intervention technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(7), e166. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Montague, E., Burns, M. N., & Rashidi, P. (2014). The behavioral intervention technology model: An integrated conceptual and technological framework for ehealth and mhealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e146. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1987). The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile. Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan, A. N., & Lachman, M. E. (2017). Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Frontiers in Public Health, 4(289), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaddha, A., Jackson, E. A., Richardson, C. R., & Franklin, B. A. (2017). Technology to help promote physical activity. American Journal of Cardiology, 119(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyons, E. J., Swartz, M. C., Lewis, Z. H., Martinez, E., & Jennings, K. (2017). Feasibility and acceptability of a wearable technology physical activity intervention with telephone counseling for mid-aged and older adults: a randomized controlled pilot trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(3), e28. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6967

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, E. N., Santoro, E., Moraveji, N., Susi, M., & Crum, A. J. (2019). Integrating wearables in stress management interventions: promising evidence from a randomized trial. International Journal of Stress Management. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Handel, B., & Kolstad, J. (2017). Wearable Technologies and Health Behaviors: New Data and New Methods to Understand Population Health. The American economic review, 107(5), 481–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yurkiewicz, I. R., Simon, P., Liedtke, M., Dahl, G., & Dunn, T. (2018). Effect of fitbit and ipad wearable technology in health-related quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, 7(5), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016). Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? PharmacoEconomics, 34(7), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hogan, S. J., Witell, L., & Snyder, H. (2017). Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Knight, A., & Bidargaddi, N. (2018). Commonly available activity tracker apps and wearables as a mental health outcome indicator: A prospective observational cohort study among young adults with psychological distress. Journal of Affective Disorders, 236(April), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Arriba-Pérez, F., Santos-Gago, J. M., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., & Ramos-Merino, M. (2019). Study of stress detection and proposal of stress-related features using commercial-off-the-shelf wrist wearables. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(12), 4925–4945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01188-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenberger, M. E., Buman, M. P., Haskell, W. L., McConnell, M. V., & Carstensen, L. L. (2016). Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(3), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000778

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang, S. G., Kang, J. M., Ko, K. P., Park, S. C., Mariani, S., & Weng, J. (2017). Validity of a commercial wearable sleep tracker in adult insomnia disorder patients and good sleepers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 97(2016), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kortlik, J.W. & Williams, H. A. (2003). The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Journal Spring.

  31. Walker, S., Sechrist, K., & Pender, N. (1995). Health Promotion Model - Instruments to Measure Health Promoting Lifestyle : Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile [HPLP II] (Adult Version). Journal of Nursing Research.

  32. Teng, H. L., Yen, M., & Fetzer, S. (2010). Health promotion lifestyle profile-II: Chinese version short form. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05353.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Harper, A., Power, M., Orley, J., Herrman, H., Schofield, H., Murphy, B., & Sartorius, N. (1998). Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. Der. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.

  35. Espinoza, J., Chen, A., Orozco, J., Deavenport-Saman, A., & Yin, L. (2017). Effect of personal activity trackers on weight loss in families enrolled in a comprehensive behavioral family-lifestyle intervention program in the federally qualified health center setting: A randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 7(June), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.06.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cowdery, J., Majeske, P., Frank, R., & Brown, D. (2015). Exergame Apps and Physical Activity: The Results of the ZOMBIE Trial. American Journal of Health Education, 46(4), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2015.1043063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, J.-L., Guedes, C. M., & Lung, A. E. (2018). Smartphone-based healthy weight management intervention for Chinese American adolescents short-term efficacy and factors associated with decreased weight. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis, Z. H., Pritting, L., Picazo, A. L., & JeanMarie-Tucker, M. (2020). The utility of wearable fitness trackers and implications for increased engagement: An exploratory, mixed methods observational study. Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619900059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Millings, A., Morris, J., Rowe, A., Easton, S., Martin, J. K., Majoe, D., & Mohr, C. (2015). Can the effectiveness of an online stress management program be augmented by wearable sensor technology? Internet Interventions, 2(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2015.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Amarantos, E., Martinez, A., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Nutrition and quality of life in older adults. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.suppl_2.54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lennefer, T., Lopper, E., Wiedemann, A. U., Hess, U., & Hoppe, A. (2019). Improving Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being and Physical Health Through a Technology-Based Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Intervention- Control Group Study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Coughlin, S. S., & Stewart, J. (2016). Use of Consumer Wearable Devices to Promote Physical Activity A Review of Health Intervention Studies. Journal of environment and health sciences. https://doi.org/10.15436/2378-6841.16.1123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Baron, K. G., Duffecy, J., Berendsen, M. A., Cheung Mason, I., Lattie, E. G., & Manalo, N. C. (2018). Feeling validated yet? A scoping review of the use of consumer-targeted wearable and mobile technology to measure and improve sleep. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 40, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Randriambelonoro, M., Chen, Y., & Pu, P. (2017). Can Fitness Trackers Help Diabetic and Obese Users Make and Sustain Lifestyle Changes? Computer, 50(3), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jiang, X., Ming, W. K., & You, J. H. S. (2019). The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions on the management of cardiovascular diseases: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2196/13166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stephenson, A., McDonough, S. M., Murphy, M. H., Nugent, C. D., & Mair, J. L. (2017). Using computer, mobile and wearable technology enhanced interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 14(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0561-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant [MOST 108–2314-B-038–011]. The funding body had no role in the design of the study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Gerontology Health Management, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing St., Taipei, 11031, Taiwan

    Hsin-Yen Yen

Authors
  1. Hsin-Yen Yen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Yen Yen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All participants signed an informed consent form. Ethical approval was granted by the Taiwan Medical University-Joint Institutional Review Board (N2018090327).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yen, HY. Smart wearable devices as a psychological intervention for healthy lifestyle and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res 30, 791–802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02680-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02680-6

Keywords

  • Health behavior
  • Physical activity
  • Mobile health
  • Stress management
  • Sedentary behavior