Skip to main content

Patient-reported outcomes in melanoma survivors at 1, 3 and 5 years post-diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study

Quality of Life Research volume 29, pages 2021–2027 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of population-based data describing patient reported outcomes (PROs) in melanoma survivors which could guide the development of interventions and resources. This study assessed overall quality of life (QoL), self-reported symptoms and unmet information needs in melanoma survivors 1, 3 or 5 years post-diagnosis.

Methods

A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted in Victoria, Australia, with eligible melanoma survivors identified from a population-based cancer registry. Patient-reported outcome measures included the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and self-reported symptoms, difficulties and information needs. Associations between demographic, disease and care-related factors and QoL were also assessed.

Results

A total of 476 melanoma survivors participated in the study (response rate 46.5%). Anxiety and depressive symptoms were more prevalent in survivors compared to the general population (30.7% vs 21.6%; p < 0.01). Fear of cancer recurrence (48.3%) and fear of cancer spreading (37.8%) were the most commonly reported symptom items, and approximately one in five melanoma survivors had unmet information needs related to psychological aspects of living with melanoma. Recurrent melanoma, living in a nursing home, chronic comorbidities, and melanoma diagnosed at > 2 mm thickness were associated with lower QoL.

Conclusion

A large proportion of melanoma survivors reported ongoing quality of life deficits, fear of cancer recurrence, as well as unmet information needs up to 5 years after diagnosis. Patients may benefit from tailored informational resources and interventions that address the psychological aspects of living with and beyond melanoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cancer in Australia 2017. Cancer series no. 101.Cat. no. CAN 100. 2017. AIHW: Canberra

  2. Hamel, J.-F., et al. (2016). A systematic review examining factors influencing health related quality of life among melanoma cancer survivors. European Journal of Cancer,69, 189–198.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beutel, M. E., et al. (2015). Depression, anxiety and quality of life in long-term survivors of malignant melanoma: A register-based cohort study. PLoS ONE,10(1), e0116440.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costa, D. S., et al. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: An item response theory approach. Psychooncology,25(7), 832–838.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasparian, N. A., McLoone, J. K., & Butow, P. N. (2009). Psychological responses and coping strategies among patients with malignant melanoma: A systematic review of the literature. Archives of Dermatology,145(12), 1415–1427.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glaser, A. W., et al. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors in England 1–5 years after diagnosis: A cross-sectional survey. British Medical Journal Open,3(4), e002317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jefford, M., et al. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors: A population-wide cross-sectional study. Supportive Care in Cancer,25, 3171–3179.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Social Research Centre, Dual-frame omnibus survey: Technical and methodological summary report. Internal report. 2012: https://www.srcentre.com.au/docs/event-workshop-july-2012/dual-frame-omnibus-technical-report-%28pennay%29.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

  9. EuroQoL Group. (2013). EQ-5D-5L user guide. https://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/publications/user-guide.html.

  10. Norman, R., Cronin, P., & Viney, R. (2013). A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy,11(3), 287–298.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lumley, T., Survey: Analysis of complex survey samples. R package version 3.30. 2014.

  12. Winstanley, J. B., et al. (2015). Cross-cultural development of a quality-of-life measure for patients with melanoma: Phase 3 testing of an EORTC Melanoma Module. Melanoma Research,25(1), 47–58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Winstanley, J. B., et al. (2013). What are the pertinent quality-of-life issues for melanoma cancer patients? Aiming for the development of a new module to accompany the EORTC core questionnaire. Melanoma Research,23(2), 167–174.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasparian, N. A., et al. (2016). "Melanoma: Questions and answers." Development and evaluation of a psycho-educational resource for people with a history of melanoma. Supportive Care in Cancer,24(12), 4849–4859.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dieng, M., et al. (2016). Psychoeducational intervention to reduce fear of cancer recurrence in people at high risk of developing another primary melanoma: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology,34(36), 4405–4414.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLoone, J., et al. (2012). When the risks are high: Psychological adjustment among melanoma survivors at high risk of developing new primary disease. Qualitative Health Research,22(8), 1102–1113.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogel, R. I., et al. (2017). Comparison of quality of life among long-term melanoma survivors and non-melanoma controls: A cross-sectional study. Quality of Life Research,26(7), 1761–1766.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holterhues, C., et al. (2011). Impact of melanoma on patients' lives among 562 survivors: A Dutch population-based study. Archives of Dermatology,147(2), 177–185.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Branstrom, R., et al. (2010). Predictors of sun protection behaviors and severe sunburn in an international online study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention,19(9), 2199–2210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lacey, K., et al. (2016). Presentations to general practice before a cancer diagnosis in Victoria: A cross-sectional survey. Medical Journal of Australia,205(2), 66–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carey, M., et al. (2012). How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making? Patient Education and Counseling,88(1), 87–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Watson, E. K., et al. (2012). Personalised cancer follow-up: Risk stratification, needs assessment or both? British Journal of Cancer,106(1), 1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Karolina Lisy and Julia Lai-Kwon are joint first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia

    Karolina Lisy & Shahneen Sandhu

  2. Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, a Richard Pratt Legacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Karolina Lisy & Michael Jefford

  3. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Julia Lai-Kwon & Michael Jefford

  4. The Social Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Andrew Ward

  5. Cincinnati Children’s Center for Heart Disease and the Developing Mind, Heart Institute and the Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Nadine A. Kasparian

  6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Nadine A. Kasparian

  7. Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, The Mater Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Julie Winstanley & Frances Boyle

  8. Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    David Gyorki

  9. Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    David Gyorki

  10. Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Karen Lacey & Jim Bishop

  11. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Karolina Lisy & Michael Jefford

Authors
  1. Karolina Lisy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Lai-Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shahneen Sandhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nadine A. Kasparian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julie Winstanley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frances Boyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Gyorki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Karen Lacey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jim Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Michael Jefford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Lisy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was granted by the Cancer Council Victoria Human Research Ethics Committee (Project No: HREC 1307). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All participants included in the study were provided with details regarding the study and informed that return of the completed study implied their consent to participate in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lisy, K., Lai-Kwon, J., Ward, A. et al. Patient-reported outcomes in melanoma survivors at 1, 3 and 5 years post-diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study. Qual Life Res 29, 2021–2027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02464-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02464-y

Keywords

  • Survivorship
  • Melanoma
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality of life