Abstract
Purpose
While studies on patients’ quality of life (QoL) are numerous, to date few have addressed the issue of what QoL means for doctors and how they use patient-reported QoL. This study aimed to explore how doctors define the concept of “patient QoL” and how they use QoL assessments in clinical practice.
Methods
Focus group (FG) interviews were conducted with French hospital doctors and general practitioners. Transcripts of the FGs were explored using inductive thematic and lexical analyses.
Results
Twenty-one clinicians participated in four FGs. They all agreed that QoL was a subjective and unstable concept, different from that of health status. In practice, the assessment of patient QoL was conducted using an intuitive and non-structured approach. Most participants thought that it would give them more confidence in making decisions and provide better patient care. But it was also seen in some cases as putting them in an uncomfortable position. The assessment of QoL requires a favourable work and organizational setting.
Conclusions
Patient QoL provides useful data for clinicians. Yet assessments are made without standardized tools. The use of such tools could be very valuable for some practitioners or in some situations, and a real source of problems for others. These problems could, however, be easily overcome with experience-sharing and training clinicians.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gotay, C. C., & Moore, T. D. (1992). Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Quality of Life Research,1(1), 5–17.
van Knippenberg, F. C., & de Haes, J. C. (1998). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,41(11), 1043–1053.
Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies,43(7), 891–901.
Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016). Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? PharmacoEconomics,34(7), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.
WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research,2(2), 153–159.
Srikrishna, S., Robinson, D., Cardozo, L., & Gonzalez, J. (2009). Is there a discrepancy between patient and physician quality of life assessment? Neurourology and Urodynamics,28(3), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20634.
Janse, A. J., Gemke, R. J. B. J., Uiterwaal, C. S. P. M., van der Tweel, I., Kimpen, J. L. L., & Sinnema, G. (2004). Quality of life: Patients and doctors don’t always agree: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,57(7), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.013.
Luoma, M. L., & Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. (2004). The meaning of quality of life in patients being treated for advanced breast cancer: A qualitative study. Psycho-oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.788.
Whalley Hammell, K. (2007). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101992.
Singer, J. P., Chen, J., Katz, P. P., Blanc, P. D., Kagawa-Singer, M., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). Defining novel health-related quality of life domains in lung transplantation: A qualitative analysis. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0875-5.
Bossola, M., Murri, R., Onder, G., Turriziani, A., Fantoni, M., & Padua, L. (2010). Physicians’ knowledge of health-related quality of life and perception of its importance in daily clinical practice. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-43.
Barlési, F., Tchouhadjian, C., Doddoli, C., Astoul, P., Thomas, P., & Auquier, P. (2006). Qualité de vie : Attitudes et perceptions des médecins d’un réseau régional de soins en oncologie thoracique. Santé Publique. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.063.0429.
Meldahl, M. L., Acaster, S., & Hayes, R. P. (2013). Exploration of oncologists’ attitudes toward and perceived value of patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research,22(4), 725–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0209-4.
Einaudi, M.-A., Simeoni, M.-C., Gire, C., Le Coz, P., Condopoulos, S., & Auquier, P. (2012). Preterm children quality of life evaluation: A qualitative study to approach physicians’ perception. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-12212.
Einaudi, M.-A., Gire, C., Loundou, A., Le Coz, P., & Auquier, P. (2013). Quality of life assessment in preterm children: physicians’ knowledge, attitude, belief, practice—A KABP study. BMC Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-58.
Baars, R. M., van der Pal, S. M., Koopman, H. M., & Wit, J. M. (2004). Clinicians’ perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica,93(10), 1356–1362.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2013). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Hoboken: Wiley.
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539800300304.
Kidd, P. S., & Parshall, M. B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118453.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.
Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2016). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
Bardin, L. (1977). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Reinert, M. (1987). Classification Descendante Hierarchique et Analvse Lexicale par Contexte - Application au Corpus des Poesies D’A. Rihbaud: Bulletin of Sociological Methodology.
Reinert, A. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique : application à l'analyse lexicale par contexte. Cahiers de l’analyse des données,8(2), 187–198.
Reinert, M. (2007). Postures énonciatives et mondes lexicaux stabilisés en analyse statistique de discours. Langage et société, no,121–122(3), 189–202.
Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal,322(7297), 1297–1300.
Slevin, M. L., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? British Journal of Cancer,57(1), 109–112.
Lohr, K. N., & Zebrack, B. J. (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9413-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving animal and human rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caillault, P., Bourdon, M., Hardouin, JB. et al. How do doctors perceive and use patient quality of life? Findings from focus group interviews with hospital doctors and general practitioners. Qual Life Res 29, 1895–1901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02451-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02451-3