Advertisement

Quality of life assessment scales in polio survivors: a scoping review

  • Surajo Kamilu SulaimanEmail author
  • Heather Michelle Aldersey
  • Nora Fayed
  • Bashir Kaka
  • Christiana Okyere
Review

Abstract

Background

Quality of life evaluation is essential to explore the effect of paralytic polio on the daily life experience of the polio survivor. Researchers have employed a range of assessment instruments to evaluate quality of life among polio survivors. Hence, to select the appropriate scale, it is crucial to compare the contents and psychometric properties of these instruments.

Purpose

This scoping review explores quality of life instruments that are used in polio literature and analyzes their contents and psychometric properties using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.

Method

Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, we conducted a literature search in the following electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies that focused on quality of life of polio survivors. Of the 88 articles that qualify for full-text screening, 34 studies met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted data from the selected studies via Covidence, a reference manager that allows for blinding of reviews.

Results

Most of the instruments included in this review are generic, self-reported, and multidimensional. Despite having mostly adequate psychometric properties, these properties were not evaluated in polio survivors.

Conclusion

The information provided in this review could be used to guide instrument selection and identify the need to develop a new tool or to adapt a pre-existing scale for measuring quality of life among polio survivors.

Keywords

Polio Quality of life Questionnaires Contents Psychometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors express their appreciation to Paola Durando, health sciences librarian, Queen’s University for her input during the literature search.

Funding

Authors declare that we have not received any funding for this review.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any study with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Hatami, R., Rassafiani, M., Pishyareh, E., Karami, S., & Hashemi, O. (2015). The effect of community based rehabilitation program on quality of life of people with physical disability in Bostanabad, Tabriz, Iran. Jentashapir Journal of Health Research, 6(3), 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iemmi, V., Gibson, L., Blanchet, K., Suresh, K., Rath, S., Hartley, S., et al. (2015). Community-based rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15, 177.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mannan, H., & Turnbull, A. P. (2007). A review of CBR-evaluations: QoL as outcome measure for future evaluations. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 18(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groce, N. E., Banks, L. M., & Stein, M. A. (2014). Surviving polio in a post-polio world. Social Science and Medicine, 107, 171–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nielsen, N. M., Kay, L., Wanscher, B., Ibsen, R., Kjellberg, J., & Jennum, P. (2016). Long-term socio-economic consequences and health care costs of poliomyelitis: A historical cohort study involving 3606 polio patients. Journal of Neurology, 263(6), 1120–1128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verdugo, M. A., Schalock, R. L., Keith, K. D., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2005). Quality of life and its measurement: Important principles and guidelines. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 707–717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, J., Bowling, A., & Flynn, T. (2004). Models of quality of life: A taxonomy, overview and systematic review of the literature review. Ageing & Society, 29, 657–678.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Theofilou, P. (2013). Quality of life: Definition and measurement. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Post, M. (2014). Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 20(3), 167–180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(7), 891–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salvador-Carulla, L., Lucas, R., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., & Miret, M. (2014). Use of the terms “Wellbeing” and “Quality of Life” in health sciences: A conceptual framework. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 28(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garip, Y., Eser, F., Bodur, H., Baskan, B., Sivas, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2017). Health related quality of life in Turkish polio survivors: Impact of post-polio on the health related quality of life in terms of functional status, severity of pain, fatigue, and social, and emotional functioning. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, 57(1), 1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lund, M. L., & Lexell, J. (2011). Life satisfaction in persons with late effects of polio. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(1), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saeki, S., & Hachisuka, K. (2006). Factors associated with Quality of life of polio survivors in Japan. JJOMT, 54, 84–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shiri, S., Wexler, I. D., Feintuch, U., Meiner, Z., & Schwartz, I. (2012). Post-polio syndrome: Impact of hope on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(10), 824–830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lexell, J., & Brogårdh, C. (2012). Life satisfaction and self-reported impairments in persons with late effects of polio. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(9–10), 577–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, E. J., Lee, S. Y., Kim, K., Jung, S. H., Jang, S. N., Han, S. J., et al. (2015). Factors associated with reduced quality of life in polio survivors in Korea. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–11.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atwal, A., Giles, A., Spiliotopoulou, G., Plastow, N., & Wilson, L. (2013). Living with polio and postpolio syndrome in the United Kingdom. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(2), 238–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spiliotopoulou, G., Fowkes, C., & Atwal, A. (2012). Assistive technology and prediction of happiness in people withpost-polio syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(3), 199–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winberg, C., Flansbjer, U. B., Carlsson, G., Rimmer, J., & Lexell, J. (2014). Physical activity in persons with late effects of polio: A descriptive study. Disability and Health Journal, 7(3), 302–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahlström, G., & Karlsson, U. (2000). Disability and quality of life in individuals with postpolio syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(9), 416–422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacob, T., & Shapira, A. (2010). Quality of life and health conditions reported from two postpolio clinics in Israel. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(4), 377–379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farbu, E., & Gilhus, N. E. (2002). Education, occupation, and perception of health amongst previous polio patients compared to their siblings. European Journal of Neurology, 9(3), 233–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kemp, J. B., & Krause, J. S. (1999). Depression and life satisfaction among people ageing with post-polio and spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(5–6), 241–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stuifbergen, A. K., Seraphine, A., Harrison, T., & Adachi, E. (2005). An explanatory model of health promotion and quality of life for persons with post-polio syndrome. Social Science and Medicine, 60(2), 383–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrison, T. C., & Stuifbergen, A. K. (2006). Life purpose: Effect on functional decline and quality of life in polio survivors. Rehabilitation Nursing, 31(4), 149–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stuifbergen, A. K. (2005). Secondary conditions and life satisfaction among polio survivors. Rehabilitation Nursing, 30(5), 173–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kling, C., Persson, A., & Gardulf, A. (2000). The health-related quality of life of patients suffering from the late effects of polio (post-polio). Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(1), 164–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Kollerits, B., Grimby, G., & Stucki, G. (2007). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 833–851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krančiukaitė, D., & Rastenytė, D. (2006). Measurement of quality of life in stroke patients. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 42(9), 709–716.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bandari, D. S., Vollmer, T. L., Khatri, B. O., & Tyry, T. (2010). Assessing quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care, 12, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Werhagen, L., & Borg, K. (2013). Impact of pain on quality of life in patients with post-polio syndrome. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(2), 161–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Souza, A. C., Alexandre, N. M., & Guirardello, E. B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ierssel Van, J., Sveistrup, H., & Marshall, S. (2018). Identifying the concepts contained within health-related quality of life outcome measures in concussion research using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 27(12), 3071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., Brien, K. K. O., Colquhoun, H. & Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467–473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bakas, T., McLennon, S. M., Carpenter, J. S. Buelow, J. M., Otte, J. L., Hanna, K. M. et al. (2012). Systematic review of health-related quality of life models. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 134 (2012)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kostanjsek, N. (2011). Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barcaccia, B., Esposito, G., Matarese, M., Bertolaso, M., Elvira, M., & De Marinis, M. G. (2013). Defining quality of life: A wild-goose chase? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ahmad, T., Arif, S., Chaudary, N., & Anjum, S. (2014). Epidemiological characteristics of poliomyelitis during the 21st Century (2000–2013). International Journal of Public Health Science, 3(3), 143–157.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Poliomyelitis. In J. Hamborsky, A. Kroger, & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases (13th ed., pp. 297–310). Washington DC: Center for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(22), 8.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., & Ostelo, R. W. J. G. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21, 651–657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Prinsen, C. A. C., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., et al. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” - a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Östlund, G., Wahlin, Å., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Borg, K. (2011). Post-polio syndrome: Fatigued patients a specific subgroup? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(1), 39–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vasiliadis, H. M., Collet, J. P., Shapiro, S., Venturini, A., & Trojan, D. A. (2002). Predictive factors and correlates for pain in postpoliomyelitis syndrome patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), 1109–1115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jung, T. D., Broman, L., Stibrant-Sunnerhagen, K., Gonzalez, H., & Borg, K. (2014). Quality of life in Swedish patients with post-polio syndrome with a focus on age and sex. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 37(2), 173–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Trojan, D. A., Collet, J., Pollak, M. N., Shapiro, S., Jubelt, B., Miller, R. G., et al. (2001). Serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) does not correlate positively with isometric strength, fatigue, and quality of life in post-polio syndrome. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 182(2), 107–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bertolasi, L., Frasson, E., Turri, M., Gajofatto, A., Bordignon, M., Zanolin, E., et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of IV immunoglobulin in patients with postpolio syndrome. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 330(1–2), 94–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Murray, D., Hardiman, O., & Meldrum, D. (2014). Assessment of subjective and motor fatigue in Polio survivors, attending a Postpolio clinic, comparison with healthy controls and an exploration of clinical correlates. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 30(4), 229–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Finch, L. E., Venturini, A., Mayo, N. E., & Trojan, D. A. (2004). Effort-limited treadmill walk test: Reliability and validity in subjects with postpolio syndrome. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), 613–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Skough, K., Krossén, C., Heiwe, S., Theorell, H., & Borg, K. (2008). Effects of resistance training in combination with coenzyme Q10 supplementation in patients with post-polio: A pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(9), 773–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Koopman, F. S., Voorn, E. L., Beelen, A., Bleijenberg, G., De Visser, M., Brehm, M. A., et al. (2015). No reduction of severe fatigue in patients with postpolio syndrome by exercise therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30(5), 402–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Östlund, G., Wahlin, Å., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Borg, K. (2008). Vitality among Swedish patients with post-polio: A physiological phenomenon. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(9), 709–714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kaponides, G., Gonzalez, H., Olsson, T., & Borg, K. (2006). Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with post-polio syndrome—An uncontrolled pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(2), 138–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Legters, K., Verbus, N. B., Kitchen, S., Tomecsko, J., & Urban, N. (2006). Fear of falling, balance confidence and health-related quality of life in individuals with postpolio syndrome. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 22(3), 127–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vreede, K. S., Broman, L., & Borg, K. (2016). Long-term follow-up of patients with prior polio over A 17-year period. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(4), 359–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bertelsen, M., Broberg, S., & Madsen, E. (2009). Outcome of physiotherapy as part of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation in an unselected polio population with one-year follow-up: An uncontrolled study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(1), 85–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vasconcelos, O. M., Prokhorenko, O. A., Salajegheh, M. K., Kelley, K. F., Livornese, K., Olsen, C. H., et al. (2007). Modafinil for treatment of fatigue in post-polio syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 68(20), 1680–1686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gonzalez, H., Stibrant Sunnerhagen, K., Sjoberg, I., Kaponides, G., Olsson, T., & Borg, K. (2006). Intravenous immunoglobulin for post-polio syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology, 5(6), 493–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gonzalez, H., Khademi, M., Borg, K., & Olsson, T. (2012). Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of the post-polio syndrome: Sustained effects on quality of life variables and cytokine expression after one year follow up. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 9(1), 167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    On, A. Y., Oncu, J., & Uludag, B. (2005). Effects of lamotrigine on the symptoms and life qualities of patients with post polio syndrome: A randomized, controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation, 20(4), 245–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Oncu, J., Durmaz, B., & Karapolat, H. (2009). Short-term effects of aerobic exercise on functional capacity, fatigue, and quality of life in patients with post-polio syndrome. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(2), 155–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    On, A. Y., Oncu, J., Atamaz, F., & Durmaz, B. (2006). Impact of post-polio-related fatigue on quality of life. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(5), 329–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435–441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bentzen, N., Christiansen, T., McColl, E., & Meadows, K. (1998). Selection and cross-cultural adaptation of health outcome measures. The European Journal of General Practice, 4(1), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kaka, B., Ogwumike, O., & Adeniyi, A. F. (2011). Factors associated with health-related quality of life among post-paralytic polio survivors in Nigeria. AJPARS, 3(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Adegoke, B. O. A., Oni, A. A., Gbiri, C. A., & Akosile, C. O. (2012). Paralytic poliomyelitis: Quality of life of adolescent survivors. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 30(2), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Donaldson, L. J., & Hayes, K. (2018). Eradicating polio The sprint at the end of the marathon. British Medical Journal, 361(May), 10–11.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Haywood, K., Garratt, L., & Fitzpatrick, A. (2005). Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1651–1668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ware, J. E. J., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ware, J. E. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25(24), 3130–3139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fawkes, C. (2013). SF-36. National Council For Osteopathic Research.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Fayed, N., De Camargo, O. K., Kerr, E., Rosenbaum, P., Dubey, A., Bostan, C., et al. (2012). Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: A review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54, 1085–1095.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales a practical guide to their development and use (5th ed., p. 415). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kalpakjian, C. Z., & Lequerica, A. (2006). Quality of Life and menopause in women with physical disabilities. Journal of Women’s Health, 15(9), 1014–1027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kathleen, N. L., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Burnam, M. A., Patrick, D. L., Pen-in, E. B., et al. (1996). Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clinical Therapeutics, 18(5), 979–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in medicare managed care. Health Care Financing Review, 25(4), 5–25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Steffen, T., & Seney, M. (2008). Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short- form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with Parkinsonism. Physical Therapy, 88(6), 733–746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lin, M.-R., Hwang, H.-F., Chen, C.-Y., & Chiu, W.-T. (2007). Comparisons of the brief form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life and Short Form-36 for persons with spinal cord injuries. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(2), 104–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mcnaughton, H. K., Weatherall, M., & Mcpherson, K. M. (2005). Functional measures across neurologic disease states: Analysis of factors in common. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 2184–2188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Forchheimer, M., McAweeney, M., & Tate, D. (2004). Use of the SF-36 among persons with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(5), 390–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Leonardi, M., Raggi, A., Pagani, M., Carella, F., Soliveri, P., Albanese, A., et al. (2012). Parkinsonism and related disorders relationships between disability, quality of life and prevalence of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’ s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 18(1), 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Baro, E., Ferrer, M., Vazquez, O., Miralles, R., Pont, A., Esperanza, A., et al. (2006). Using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) among older adult inpatients with Varying Cognitive Function. Quality of Life Research, 15, 575–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Jans, M. P., Schellevis, Ë. G., & Van, Eijk J. T. M. (1999). The Nottingham Health Profile: Score distribution, internal consistency and and validity in asthma and COPD patients. Quality of Life Research, 8, 501–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Demet, K., Guillemin, F., & Martinet, N. (2002). Nottingham Health Profile: Reliability in a sample of 542 subjects with major amputation of one or several limbs. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 26, 120–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Beaton, D. E., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997). Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 79–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1992). Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Stuifbergen, A. K., & Roberts, G. J. (1997). Health promotion practices of women with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(Supplement), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (2007). The Quality of Life Index: Development and psychometric properties. Nursing Research, 1(88), 32–37.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    May, L. A., & Warren, S. (2002). Original Article Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: External and structural validity. Spinal Cord, 40, 341–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Marti, C., Hensler, S., Herren, D. B., Niedermann, K., & Marks, M. (2016). JHS (E) measurement properties of the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L to assess. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 41(9), 957–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Conner-spady, B. L., Marshall, D. A., Bohm, E., Dunbar, M. J., Loucks, L., Al, Khudairy A., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D- 3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Quality of Life Research, 24, 1775–1784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Brazier, J., Jones, N., & Kind, P. (1993). Testing the validity of the euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 2(3), 169–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sonntag, M., Konnopka, A., Leichsenring, F., Salzer, S., Beutel, M. E., Herpertz, S., et al. (2013). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(215), 1–9.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kaasa, S., Mastekaasa, A., & Naess, S. (1988). Quality of life of lung cancer patients in a randomized clinical trial evaluated by a psychosocial well-being questionnaire. Acta Oncologica, 27, 335–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kaasa, S., Mastekaasa, A., Stokke, I., & Naess, S. (1988). Validation of a Quality of Life Questionnaire for use in clinical trials for treatment of patients with inoperable lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 691–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    WHOQOL. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Berlim, M. T., Pavanello, D. P., Caldieraro, M. A. K., & Fleck, M. P. A. (2005). Reliability and validity of the WHOQOL BREF in a sample of Brazilian outpatients with major depression. Quality of Life Research, 14, 561–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & Connell, K. A. O. (2004). The World Health Organization’ s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Cummins, R. A., McCabe, M. P., & Romeo, Y. (1994). The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (Comqol): Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on college staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Gullone, E., & Cummins, R. A. (1999). The comprehensive quality of life scale: A psychometric evaluation with an adolescent sample. Behaviour Change, 16(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Cummins, R. A. (1997). Self-rated Quality of life Scales for people with an intellectual disability: A review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1(3), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Galanakis, M., Lakioti, A., Pezirkianidis, C., Karakasidou, E., & Stalikas, A. (2017). Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in a Greek Sample. International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 5(2), 120–127.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Post, M. W., Van Leeuwen, C. M., Van Koppenhagen, C. F., & De Groot, S. (2012). Validity of the life satisfaction questions, the life satisfaction questionnaire, and the satisfaction with life scale in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), 1832–1837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    López-ortega, M., Torres-castro, S., & Rosas-carrasco, O. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(170), 1–7.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Brorsson, B., Ifver, J., & Hays, R. D. (1993). The Swedish health-related quality of life survey. Quality of Life Research, 2(1), 33–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Huo, T., Guo, Y., Shenkman, E., & Muller, K. (2018). Assessing the reliability of the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey in adults with mental health conditions: A report from the wellness incentive and navigation (WIN) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(34), 1–8.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hayes, C. J., Bhandari, N. R., Kathe, N., & Payakachat, N. (2017). Reliability and validity of the medical outcomes study short form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) in adults with non-cancer pain. Healthcare, 5(22), 1–12.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Salyers, M. P., Bosworth, H. B., Swanson, J. W., Lamb-Pagone, J., & Osher, F. C. (2000). Reliability and validity of the SF-12 Health Survey among people with severe mental illness. Medical Care, 38(11), 1141–1150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surajo Kamilu Sulaiman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heather Michelle Aldersey
    • 1
  • Nora Fayed
    • 1
  • Bashir Kaka
    • 2
  • Christiana Okyere
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Rehabilitation TherapyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health SciencesBayero UniversityKanoNigeria

Personalised recommendations