Advertisement

Normative values for the distress thermometer (DT) and the emotion thermometers (ET), derived from a German general population sample

  • Andreas Hinz
  • Alex J. Mitchell
  • Csaba L. Dégi
  • Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

The distress thermometer (DT) and the emotion thermometers (ET) are short screening instruments for use in oncological practice. The aim of this study was to provide normative values and to analyze the correlational structure of the ET.

Methods

A representative sample of the adult German general population (N = 2437) completed the ET, the PHQ-4, the FACIT-fatigue scale, and the demoralization scale.

Results

The percentages of people above the cutoff (≥ 4) and the mean scores of the five ET scales were as follows: distress: 39.0%, M = 3.15 ± 2.62, anxiety: 12.3%, M = 1.36 ± 1.93, depression: 16.1%, M = 1.65 ± 2.11, anger: 24.5%, M = 2.33 ± 2.16, and need for help: 10.7%, M = 1.18 ± 1.90. Women reported significantly higher levels of burden than men, with effect sizes between 0.07 (anger) and 0.36 (anxiety). All ET dimensions were interrelated (r between 0.44 and 0.69) and significantly correlated with the other scales (r between 0.36 and 0.68).

Conclusions

The normative scores can help qualify assessments of groups of patients. The new four dimensions of the ET provide relevant additional information that is not already covered by the DT.

Keywords

Distress Screening General population Normative study 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Leipzig. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Mitchell, A. J. (2010). Short screening tools for cancer-related distress: A review and diagnostic validity meta-analysis. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 8(4), 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell, A. J. (2007). Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(29), 4670–4681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). (2003). Distress management. Clinical practice guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 1(3), 344–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roth, A. J., Kornblith, A. B., Batel-Copel, L., Peabody, E., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1998). Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 82(10), 1904–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Recklitis, C. J., Blackmon, J. E., & Chang, G. (2016). Screening young adult cancer survivors for distress with the distress thermometer: Comparisons with a structured clinical diagnostic interview. Cancer, 122(2), 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma, X., Zhang, J., Zhong, W., Shu, C., Wang, F., Wen, J., et al. (2014). The diagnostic role of a short screening tool—The distress thermometer: A meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(7), 1741–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donovan, K. A., Grassi, L., McGinty, H. L., & Jacobsen, P. B. (2014). Validation of the distress thermometer worldwide: State of the science. Psycho-Oncology, 23(3), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leclair, T., Carret, A.-S., Samson, Y., & Sultan, S. (2016). Stability and repeatability of the distress thermometer (DT) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) with parents of childhood cancer survivors. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0159773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitchell, A. J., Baker-Glenn, E. A., Park, B., Granger, L., & Symonds, P. (2010). Can the distress thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part II. What is the optimal combination of emotion thermometers? Psycho-Oncology, 19(2), 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitchell, A. J., Baker-Glenn, E. A., Granger, L., & Symonds, P. (2010). Can the distress thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the emotion thermometers tool. Psycho-Oncology, 19(2), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, A. J., Morgan, J. P., Petersen, D., Fabbri, S., Fayard, C., Stoletniy, L., et al. (2012). Validation of simple visual-analogue thermometer screen for mood complications of cardiovascular disease: The emotion thermometers. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136(3), 1257–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, K. R., Tan, S. M., Lum, S. S., Lim, L. E., & Krishna, L. K. (2016). Validation of the emotion thermometers and hospital anxiety and depression scales in Singapore: Screening cancer patients for distress, anxiety and depression. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(2), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schubart, J. R., Mitchell, A. J., Dietrich, L., & Gusani, N. J. (2015). Accuracy of the emotion thermometers (ET) screening tool in patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 33(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Oers, H. A., Schepers, S. A., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Haverman, L. (2017). Dutch normative data and psychometric properties for the distress thermometer for parents. Quality of Life Research, 26(1), 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Löwe, B., Wahl, I., Rose, M., Spitzer, C., Glaesmer, H., Wingenfeld, K., et al. (2010). A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(1–2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yellen, S. B., Cella, D. F., Webster, K., Blendowski, C., & Kaplan, E. (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13(2), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cella, D., Lai, J.-S., Chang, C.-H., Peterman, A., & Slavin, M. (2002). Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer, 94(2), 528–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehnert, A., Vehling, S., Hocker, A., Lehmann, C., & Koch, U. (2011). Demoralization and depression in patients with advanced cancer: Validation of the German version of the demoralization scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(5), 768–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kissane, D. W., Wein, S., Love, A., Lee, X. Q., Kee, P. L., & Clarke, D. M. (2004). The demoralization scale: A report of its development and preliminary validation. Journal of Palliative Care, 20(4), 269–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Faller, H., Weis, J., Koch, U., Brähler, E., Härter, M., Keller, M., et al. (2017). Utilization of professional psychological care in a large German sample of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 26(4), 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bidstrup, P. E., Mertz, B. G., Dalton, S. O., Deltour, I., Kroman, N., Kehlet, H., et al. (2012). Accuracy of the Danish version of the ‘distress thermometer’. Psycho-Oncology, 21(4), 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lazenby, M., Dixon, J., Bai, M., & McCorkle, R. (2014). Comparing the distress thermometer (DT) with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 for screening for possible cases of depression among patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care, 12(1), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ryan, D. A., Gallagher, P., Wright, S., & Cassidy, E. M. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of the distress thermometer and a two-item depression screen (Patient Health Questionnaire-2) with a ‘help’ question for psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 21(12), 1275–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers, S. N., Mepani, V., Jackson, S., & Lowe, D. (2017). Health-related quality of life, fear of recurrence, and emotional distress in patients treated for thyroid cancer. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 55(7), 666–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Löwe, B., Decker, O., Müller, S., Brähler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., et al. (2008). Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care, 46(3), 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales—five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Psychology and Medical SociologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Cancer and Molecular MedicineUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Sociology and Social WorkBabes-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations