Abstract
Purpose
Assistive technologies are widely implemented in clinical and research settings. Despite their dissemination, the psychosocial impact of their adoption still deserves further consideration. The aim of the present study is to determine the degree of compatibility between the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).
Methods
Six health professionals (two neurologists, one neuro-rehabilitation technician, two psychologists, one university professor of rehabilitation) created a technical board to discuss upon the PIADS–ICF linking. The standardized linking methodology was applied, and a Delphi technique was used to examine consensus.
Results
Five Delphi sessions were required to reach 100% of consensus and to finalize the procedure. Of the 26 PIADS’ items, 23 were linked to an ICF category: 9 items were endorsed at the 3rd ICF level, and 14 items at the 2nd ICF level. Two items were classified as “not defined” and 1 item as “not covered”.
Conclusion
The study highlighted the conceptual connection between the PIADS and the ICF framework and set a bio-psychosocial standpoint by which accounting the role of assistive devices in rehabilitation settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For further information, contact Jeffrey Jutai: jjutai@uottawa.ca.
Abbreviations
- ICF:
-
International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
- PIADS:
-
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale
- HRQoL:
-
Health-Related Quality of Life
References
Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., & Stucki, G. (2018). Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 54(1), 110–117.
De Moura, L., dos Santos, W. R., de Castro, S. S., et al. (2017). Applying the ICF linking rules to compare population-based data from different sources: An exemplary analysis of tools used to collect information on disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1370734.
Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Üstün, T. B. (2016). Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: Requirements and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(4), 223–228.
Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Melvin, J. (2007). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285.
Lucas, J. W., Greenberg, M., & Beavan, K. (2017). Research on physical disability in sociological social psychology: The state of the field and future directions. Social Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12555.
World Health Organisation. (2001). ICF. Geneva: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Stucki, G., & Grimby, G. (2004). Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 5–6.
Escorpizo, R., Kostanjsek, N., Kennedy, C., et al. (2013). Harmonizing WHO’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Importance and methods to link disease and functioning. BMC Public Health, 13, 742.
Stucki, G. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(10), 733–740.
Madden, R. H., & Bundy, A. (2018). The ICF has made a difference to functioning and disability measurement and statistics. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1431812.
Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(5), 281–282.
ICF Research Branch. (2018). Retrieved June 28, 2018 from https://www.icf-research-branch.org.
Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.
Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., et al. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.
Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., et al. (2016). Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258.
Ballert, C., Hopfe, M., Kus, S., et al. (2016). Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: A systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14, 1–17.
Fayed, N., Cieza, A., & Bickenbach, J. E. (2011). Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: A systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(21–22), 1941–1951.
Letellier, M. E., Dawes, D., & Mayo, N. (2015). Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research, 24, 757–768.
Nicol, R., Robinson, N. M., Hopfe, M., & Newell, D. (2016). Linking the Bournemouth Questionnaire for low back pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(11), 1089–1096.
Wong, A. W. K., Lau, S. C. L., Cella, D., et al. (2017). Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Quality of Life Research, 26(9), 2435–2448.
Azzopardi, R. V., Vermeiren, S., Gorus, E., et al. (2016). Linking Frailty Instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.023.
Figueiredo, D. (2014). Linking the EASY-Care Standard to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(7), 593–599.
Sommer, R., Bullinger, M., Rohenkohl, A., et al. (2015). Linking a short-stature specific health-related quality of life measure (QoLISSY) to the International Classification of Functioning-Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(5), 439–446.
Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159–168.
Day, H., Jutai, J., & Campbell, K. A. (2002). Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Lessons learned and the road ahead. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 31–37.
Garry, J., Casey, K., Cole, T. K., et al. (2016). A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care. Surgery, 159(3), 938–944.
Fundarò, C., Giardini, A., Maestri, R., Traversoni, S., Bartolo, M., & Casale, R. (2018). Motor and psychosocial impact of robot-assisted gait training in a real-world rehabilitation setting: A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0191894.
Borgestig, M., Falkmer, T., & Hemmingsson, H. (2013). Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: A pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(6), 463–470.
Pettersson, I., Ahlstrom, G., & Tornquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.
MacPhee, A. H., Kirby, R. L., Coolen, A. L., et al. (2004). Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(1), 41–50.
Andrich, R., Salatino, C., Converti, R. M., et al. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of powered wheelchairs: Findings of a study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 84–91.
Kirby, R. L., & MacPhee, A. H. (2006). Re: An enhanced wheelchair-skills training program improved the competency of manual wheelchair users. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00567.x.
Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J. W. (2013). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17(3–4), 63–79.
Ward, A. L., Hammond, S., Holsten, S., et al. (2015). Power wheelchair use in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Changes over time. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 238–245.
Salatino, C., Andrich, R., Converti, R. M., & Saruggia, M. (2016). An observational study of powered wheelchair provision in Italy. Assistive Technology, 28(1), 41–52.
Buning, M. E., Angelo, J. A., & Schmeler, M. R. (2001). Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: A pilot study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 339–344.
Pousada García, T., Groba González, B., Rivero, N. L., et al (2015). Exploring the psychosocial impact of wheelchair and contextual factors on quality of life of people with neuromuscular disorders. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 246–256.
Pettersson, I., Ahlström, G., & Törnquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.
Giesbrecht, E. M., Ripat, J. D., Quanbury, A. O., et al. (2009). Participation in community-based activities of daily living: Comparison of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 198–207.
Stucki, G. (2016). Olle Höök lectureship 2015: The World Health Organization’s paradigm shift and implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(6), 486–493.
World Health Organization. (1980). ICIDH. Geneva: International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps.
Trabacca, A., Moro, G., Gennaro, L., & Russo, L. (2012). When one plus one equals three: The ICF perspective of health and disability in the third millennium. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(4), 709–710.
Stucki, G., Ewert, T., & Cieza, A. (2002). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(17), 932–938.
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2013). Cook and Husseys’ assistive technologies, (4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby
Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107–111.
Andrich, R., Pedroni, F., & Vanni, G. (2003). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Italian localization of the PIADS instrument. In G. Craddock et al. (Eds.), Assistive technology: Shaping the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Day, H., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., et al. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404.
Jutai, J., Day, H., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2004). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry, 74(5), 299–308.
Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., et al. (2002). Reliability, validity and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 21–30.
Harada, N., Fong, S., Heiney, C., et al. (2014). Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Developmen, 51(2), 275–283.
Yachnin, D., Jutai, J., Gharib, G., et al. (2015). Can technology-assisted toilets improve quality of life for rehabilitating stroke patients? A pilot cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.101.
Wiklund Axelsson, S., Nyberg, L., Näslund, A., et al. (2013). The anticipated positive psychosocial impact of present web-based E-health services and future mobile health applications: An investigation among older Swedes. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/509198.
Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237.
Darzins, S. W., Imms, C., & Di Stefano, M. (2016). Measurement of activity limitations and participation restrictions: Examination of ICF-linked content and scale properties of the FIM and PC-PART instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(10), 1025–1038.
Annicchiarico, R. (2012). Enhancing service delivering, improving quality of life, preserving independence through assistive technology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 180, 14–18.
Hwang, C. S., Weng, H. H., Wang, L. F., et al. (2014). An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers burden. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(4), 233–238.
Baldassin, V., Shimizu, H. E., & Fachin-Martins, E. (2018). Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 27(3), 597–607.
Eriksson, M., Jylli, L., Villard, L., Kroksmark, A. K., & Bartonek, A. (2018). Health-related quality of life and orthosis use in a Swedish population with arthrogryposis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364618774059.
Post, M. (2014). Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 20(3), 167–180.
Le, J., Dorstyn, D. S., Mpfou, et al. (2018). Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1885-5.
Hwang, K., & Mpofu, E. (2010). Health care quality assessments. In E. Mpofu & T. Oakland (Eds.), Rehabilitation and health assessment: Applying ICF guidelines (pp. 141–161). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Traversoni, S., Jutai, J., Fundarò, C. et al. Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Qual Life Res 27, 3217–3227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6