Abstract
Introduction
The objective for this study was to combine drinking characteristics and two subjective measures, drinker identity and alcohol-related quality of life, i.e., negative impact of alcohol on quality of life, to determine relevant profiles for indicated prevention programs. In particular, we hypothesized that different profiles of students with high level of alcohol consumption exist when exploring subjectivity.
Methods
We performed an online survey among 16,930 students. We collected sociodemographics and environmental data, including alcohol-related quality of life, drinker identity, and drinking characteristics. We performed a hierarchical clustering on principal components. We described all variables in each cluster and explored between clusters differences by Kruskal–Wallis tests.
Results
We identified five clusters as regarding drinker identity, drinking characteristics, and alcohol-related quality of life. Among these five clusters, three clusters presented high drinking characteristics. A very vulnerable cluster showed high level of alcohol consumption, impact on quality of life and on academic results, and strong drinker identity. An egodystonic cluster showed high level of consumption, mild impact on quality of life and on academic results, but low drinker identity. A cluster seemed short-term super-adapted in heavy drinking environment, showing high level of alcohol consumption and drinker identity, but low impact on quality of life and on academic results (all between clusters p values < 0.001 with Kruskal–Wallis tests).
Conclusion
The subjective experience of students from these clusters was significantly different (p value < 0.001), and could explain some inadequacy of certain prevention strategies, considering binge drinker student as a homogeneous group. Prospective studies are needed to explore changes over time of these clusters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, F., & Richard, J. B. (2014). Alcohol use in France. Presse Med, 43(10 Pt 1), 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2014.02.027.
Naimi, T. S., Nelson, D. E., & Brewer, R. D. (2010). The intensity of binge alcohol consumption among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.039.
Reich, R. R., Cummings, J. R., Greenbaum, P. E., Moltisanti, A. J., & Goldman, M. S. (2015). The temporal “pulse” of drinking: Tracking 5 years of binge drinking in emerging adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(3), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000061.
Sneider, J. T., Cohen-Gilbert, J. E., Crowley, D. J., Paul, M. D., & Silveri, M. M. (2013). Differential effects of binge drinking on learning and memory in emerging adults. Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.S7-006.
Wong, M. M., Robertson, G. C., & Dyson, R. B. (2015). Prospective relationship between poor sleep and substance-related problems in a national sample of adolescents. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 39(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12618.
Lannoy, S., Billieux, J., & Maurage, P. (2014). Beyond inhibition: A dual-process perspective to renew the exploration of binge drinking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00405.
Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2007). School-based programmes to prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug use. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(6), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701797753.
Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., Scheier, L. M., Williams, C., & Epstein, J. A. (2000). Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addictive Behaviors, 25(5), 769–774.
Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tbourazi, D., & I, B.-S. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159.
Luquiens, A., Falissard, B., & Aubin, H. J. (2016). Students worry about the impact of alcohol on quality of life: Roles of frequency of binge drinking and drinker self-concept. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.031.
Luquiens, A., Whalley, D., Crawford, S. R., Laramee, P., Doward, L., Price, M., et al. (2014). Development of the Alcohol Quality of Life Scale (AQoLS): A new patient-reported outcome measure to assess health-related quality of life in alcohol use disorder. Quality of Life Research, 24(6), 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0865-7.
Luquiens, A., Whalley, D., Laramee, P., Falissard, B., Kostogianni, N., Rehm, J., et al. (2016). Validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument of health-related quality of life specific to patients with alcohol use disorder: The Alcohol Quality of Life Scale (AQoLS). Quality of Life Research, 25(6), 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1190-5.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les. Editions de Minuit.
Carlsson, J., Wangqvist, M., & Frisen, A. (2015). Identity development in the late twenties: A never ending story. Developmental Psychology, 51(3), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038745.
van Lettow, B., de Vries, H., Burdorf, A., Conner, M., & van Empelen, P. (2015). Explaining young adults’ drinking behaviour within an augmented theory of planned behaviour: Temporal stability of drinker prototypes. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12101.
Lindgren, K. P., Ramirez, J. J., Namaky, N., Olin, C. C., & Teachman, B. A. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit drinking identity centrality and hazardous drinking. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 4, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.10.004.
Rinker, D. V., & Neighbors, C. (2015). Latent class analysis of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria among heavy-drinking college students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 57, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.05.006.
DiBello, A. M., Miller, M. B., Young, C. M., Neighbors, C., & Lindgren, K. P. (2017). Explicit drinking identity and alcohol problems: The mediating role of drinking to cope. Addictive Behaviors, 76, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.031.
Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795.
Cortes-Tomas, M. T., Gimenez-Costa, J. A., Motos-Selles, P., & Sancerni-Beitia, M. D. (2015). Different versions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as screening instruments for underage binge drinking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 158, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.033.
Shadel, W. G., & Mermelstein, R. (1996). Individual differences in self-concept among smokers attempting to quit: Validation and predictive utility of measures of the smoker self-concept and abstainer self-concept. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883391.
Lindgren, K. P., Neighbors, C., Teachman, B. A., Wiers, R. W., Westgate, E., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). I drink therefore I am: Validating alcohol-related implicit association tests. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–13.
Ward, J. H., Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.
Scott, S., Shucksmith, J., Baker, R., & Kaner, E. (2017). ‘Hidden habitus’: A qualitative study of socio-ecological influences on drinking practices and social identity in mid-adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(6), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060611.
Montes, K. S., Dearing, R. L., Claus, E. D., & Witkiewitz, K. (2017). Does change in self-perceived problem drinker identity relate to change in alcohol use? An examination of nontreatment seeking hazardous drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(6), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000305.
Schuckit, M. A., Tapert, S., Matthews, S. C., Paulus, M. P., Tolentino, N. J., Smith, T. L., et al. (2012). fMRI differences between subjects with low and high responses to alcohol during a stop signal task. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01590.x.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Charlotte Baey, Véronique Le Chevalier, Filipa Lopes and the Ecole Centrale Paris, Conférence des Grandes Ecoles, Mr G Majou, Conférence des Directeurs des Ecoles Françaises d’Ingénieurs, Mrs C Guiria, Conférence des Présidents d’Université, Mrs C Marseault, Association Des Services de Santé Universitaires, Dr A Perreve, and Dr Gerbault, Observatoire de la Vie Etudiante, Bureau National des Elèves Ingénieurs, Bureau Des Etudiants of Lorraine University, and all participating universities and students.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
LA has received sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, speaker honoraria, and consultancy fees from Lundbeck and Indivior. BA has received sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, speaker honoraria, and consultancy fees from Lundbeck, Mylan, Gilead, Jansenn Cilag and Indivior. AHJ has received sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, speaker honoraria, and consultancy fees from Bioprojet, D&A Pharma, Ethypharm, Lundbeck, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and Pfizer. AB, BSA, FSDVE, LMA, SH, and CT have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was notified and authorized by the “Comité National Informatique et Libertés” with the number 1692676 v 0. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Responders completed the survey in complete anonymity. Responders were willing students recruited from the community. They were informed in writing the purpose of the survey before its commencement and that they were free to leave any time before completing the survey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luquiens, A., Said, A.B., Sadik, H. et al. Alcohol consumption, drinker identity, and quality of life among students: why there cannot be one prevention strategy for all. Qual Life Res 27, 2629–2637 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1923-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1923-3