Oral health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with and without migration background in Germany
- 4 Downloads
To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children and adolescents with and without migration background, and to assess whether potential differences in OHRQoL can be sufficiently explained by oral health characteristics.
Materials und methods
A consecutive sample of 112 children and adolescents was recruited in a German university-based orthodontic clinic, and a convenience sample of 313 children and adolescents of German public schools was enrolled in the study (total N = 425, age range 7–17 years). However, 29 participants were excluded due to insufficient information regarding migration background. Accordingly, the non-migrant group consisted of 262 participants (61.6%). For children with migration background, two groups were classified: (i) one parent born in a foreign country (N = 41, 9.6%, single-sided migration background), and (ii) both parents and/or child born in a foreign country ( N= 93, 21.9%, double-sided migration background). OHRQoL was assessed using the German 19-item version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP-G19). Additionally, physical oral health of 269 children with classified migration background was determined in a dental examination.
Overall, OHRQoL was significantly lower in the group with double-sided migration background indicated by lower COHIP-G19 summary scores (mean: 58.6 points) than in the group with single-sided migration background (mean: 63.3 points) or the non-migrant group (mean: 63.2 points). Likewise, the summary scores of the subscale “oral health well-being” and the subscale “social/emotional, school, and self-image” were also lower in the double-sided migrant group than in the other two groups. Linear regression analysis showed an association between double-sided migration background and impaired OHRQoL, even after statistically controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and oral health characteristics.
Children and adolescents with double-sided migration background have poorer OHRQoL than comparably aged migrants with single-sided migration background or non-migrations. Between-group differences in OHRQoL could not be sufficiently explained by effects of socioeconomic status or physical oral health characteristics. Thus, other methodological, cultural, or immigration-related factors might also play an important role for the observed effects.
KeywordsChild Oral Health Impact Profile Oral health-related quality of life Children Migration
This study was partly funded by the German Orthodontic Society (DGKFO; Grant Reference: 49). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Schenk, L., & Knopf, H. (2007). Oral health behaviour of children and adolescents in Germany. First results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 50, 653–658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kurth, B. M. (2007). The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS): An overview of its planning, implementation and results taking into account aspects of quality management. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 50, 533–546.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Marschalck, P., & Wiedl, K. H. (2005). Migration und Krankheit. Osnabrück: IMIS-Schriften.Google Scholar
- 8.Razum, O., Zeeb, H., Meesmann, U., Schenk, L., Bredehorst, M., Brzoska, P., et al. (2008). Migration und Gesundheit. Schwerpunktbericht der Gesundheitsberichterstattung. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut.Google Scholar
- 10.Aarabi, G., Reissmann, D., Farhan, D., Heydecke, G., & Kofahl, C. (2013). Die Mundgesundheit von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland - eine kritische Betrachtung der vorliegenden Studien. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitung, 68, 280–287.Google Scholar
- 12.C. Currie, C. Roberts, A. Morgan, R. Smith, W. Settertobulte, O. Samdal, Rasmussen, V. (2004). Young people’s health in context. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2001/2002 survey. Copenhagen: Health Policy for Children and Adolescents.Google Scholar
- 13.World Health Organization. (2013). Oral health surveys: Basic methods (5th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 21.Statistisches Bundesamt (2012). Bevölkerung mit Migrationshindergrund. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2011. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar