This study aimed to assess the impact of gambling problems on quality of life. Specifically, we generated disability weight estimates for gambling problems in New Zealand, and compared these results with (i) Australian figures (J Gambl Issues, 10.4309/jgi.v0i36.3978, 2017) and (ii) other health states (Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8, 2013); such as anxiety and alcohol use disorders.
The 324 participants (48 experts and 276 general population members) evaluated a series of gambling harm vignettes. The participants rated the decrement to one’s quality of life using Visual Analogue Scale and Time Trade-Off protocols (Br Med Bull, 10.1093/bmb/ldq033, 2010). These evaluations enabled the calculation of disability weights for three categories of gamblers (low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gamblers).
Disability weight estimates for low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gamblers in NZ were consistently higher than the Australian weights: low (0.18 vs. 0.13), moderate (0.37 vs. 0.29), and problem (0.54 vs. 0.44). The quality of life impact for problem gambling in NZ (0.54) was comparable to that experienced in severe alcohol use disorder (0.55) (Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8, 2013).
This study represents one of the first attempts to assess gambling-related harm through a public health perspective. The results of this study are informative for policy-making, resource allocation, and service planning. These estimates now allow for the population-level impact of gambling in NZ to be calculated and tracked over time, which is essential for informing harm-minimisation initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014). New Zealand 2012 national gambling study: Gambling harm and problem gambling. Retrieved from http://www.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/508588/Report-final-National-Gambling-Study-Report-No.-2.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Li, E., Browne, M., Rawat, V., Langham, E., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Breaking bad: Comparing gambling harms among gamblers and affected others. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9632-8.
Kohler, D. (2014). A monetary valuation of the quality of life loss associated with pathological gambling: An application using a health utility index. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2014.29.9.
Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., et al. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: A public health perspective. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/information-and-resources/research/recent-research/assessing-gambling-related-harm-in-victoria-a-public-health-perspective. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Hare, S. (2015). Study of gambling and health in Victoria. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/25551/Study_of_gambling_and_health_in_Victoria.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Volberg, R., Williams, R., Stanek, E., Houpt, A., Zorn, M., & Rodriguez-Monguio, R. (2015). Gambling and problem gambling in Massachusetts: Results of a baseline population survey. Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/seigma/sites/default/files/SEIGMA%20Baseline%20Survey%20Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Morasco, B. J., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Gambling problems and health functioning in individuals receiving disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500242507.
Morasco, B. J., Pietrzak, R. H., Blanco, C., Grant, B. F., Hasin, D., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Health problems and medical utilization associated with gambling disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psychosomatic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000238466.76172.cd.
Morasco, B. J., Eigen, V., K. A., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Severity of gambling is associated with physical and emotional health in urban primary care patients. General Hospital Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.09.004.
Erickson, L., Molina, C. A., Ladd, G. T., Pietrzak, R. H., & Petry, N. M. (2005). Problem and pathological gambling are associated with poorer mental and physical health in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1357.
Pietrzak, R. H., Molina, C. A., Ladd, G. T., Kerins, G. J., & Petry, N. M. (2005). Health and psychosocial correlates of disordered gambling in older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019442-200506000-00010.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D., & Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metrics.
Browne, M., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Langham, E., Rockloff, M., & Hanley, C. (2017). What is the harm? Applying a public health methodology to measure the impact of gambling problems and harm on quality of life. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.v0i36.3978.
Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Understanding gambling related harm: A proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0.
Korn, D., & Shaffer, H. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023005115932.
Browne, M., Bellinger, M., Greer, N., Kolandai-Matchett, K., Rawat, V., Langham, E., et al. (2017). Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/measuring-burden-gambling-harm-new-zealand. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Whitehead, S. J., & Ali, S. (2010). Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldq033.
Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. http://greo.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Ferris%20et%20al%282001%29The_Canadian_Problem_Gambling_Index.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Orford, J., Wardle, H., Griffiths, M., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2010). PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey: Reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement. International Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790903567132.
Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey. Retrieved from http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/British%20Gambling%20Prevalence%20Survey%202010.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Bennett, K., Torrance, G., Boyle, M., Guscott, R., & Moran, L. (2000). Development and testing of a utility measure for major, unipolar depression (McSad). Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008952602494.
Rowen, D., Brazier, J., & Van Hout, B. (2014). A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/02729-89X14559542.
Salomon, J., Vos, T., Hogan, D., Gagnon, M., Naghavi, M., Mokdad, A., et al. (2013). Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: Disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., & Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical inference under order restrictions. London: Wiley.
Robertson, T., Wright, F. T., & Dykstra, R. L. (1988). Order restricted statistical inference. New York: Wiley.
Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Problem gambling: we should measure harm rather than ‘cases’. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02505.x.
Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2009/report. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
Barbist, M.-T., Renn, D., Noisternig, B., Rumpold, G., & Hofer, S. (2008). How do medical students value health on the EQ-5D? Evaluation of hypothetical health states compared to the general population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-111.
Haagsma, J. A., Polinder, S., Cassini, A., Colzani, E., & Havelaar, A. H. (2014). Review of disability weight studies: Comparison of methodological choices and values. Population Health Metrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-014-0020-2.
Miller, H. E., & Thomas, S. (2017). The “walk of shame”: A qualitative study of the influences on negative stereotyping of problem gambling on gambling attitudes and behaviours. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9749-8.
Miller, H. E., Thomas, S., Robinson, P., & Daube, M. (2014). How the causes, consequences and solutions for problem gambling are reported in Australian newspapers: A qualitative content analysis. Australian New Zealand Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12251.
Schwarzinger, M., Stouthard, M. E., Burstrom, K., & Nord, E. (2003). Cross-national agreement on disability weights: The European disability weights project. Population Health Metrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-1-9.
Haagsma, J., Havelaar, A., Janssen, A. H., Bonsel, B.,M., G.J (2008). Disability adjusted life years and minimal disease: Application of a preference-based relevance criterion to rank enteric pathogens. Population Health Metrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-6-7.
Nord, E. (1991). The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. Int J Health Plann Manage, 6, 234–242.
Murray, C. J., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., et al. (2013). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
This research was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Health (Grant #351507/00).
Conflict of interest
All authours declare they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Central Queensland University Human Research Ethics Committee (H15/07-173), the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (14/NTA/171), and the Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee (15/217) granted ethical clearance for data collection.
Participants provided informed consent to take part in the current study.
About this article
Cite this article
Rawat, V., Browne, M., Bellringer, M. et al. A tale of two countries: comparing disability weights for gambling problems in New Zealand and Australia. Qual Life Res 27, 2361–2371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1882-8
- Disability weights
- Health-related quality of life
- Visual analogue scale
- Time trade-off