Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China
The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D), a new generic preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, was developed specifically for the application in cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments and interventions for children and adolescents. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric property of the Chinese version of CHU9D (CHU9D-CHN) in a large school-based sample in China.
Data were collected using a multi-stage sampling method from third-to-ninth-grade students in Shaanxi Province, China. Participants self-completed a hard-copy questionnaire including the CHU9D-CHN instrument, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), information on socio-demographic characteristics and self-reported health status. The psychometric properties of the CHU9D-CHN, including the internal consistency, 2-week test–retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity were studied.
A total of 1912 students participated in the survey. The CHU9D-CHN internal consistency and test–retest reliability were good to excellent with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.77 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.65, respectively. The CHU9D utility scores moderately correlated with the PedsQL total scores (r = .57, P < .001), demonstrating good convergent validity. Difference of the CHU9D utility scores among the different participants with levels of self-reported general health, health services utilisation and left-behind status demonstrated good construct validity.
The findings demonstrated adequate psychometric performance for the CHU9D-CHN. The CHU9D-CHN was a satisfactory, reliable and valid instrument to measure and value HRQoL for children and adolescents in China.
KeywordsHealth-related quality of life Utility CHU9D Children Adolescents China
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
GC was involved in the development of the Chinese version of CHU9D instrument. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Baoji Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Project No. 201601). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Written informed consent was obtained from both parents or caregivers and all individual students included in the study.
- 9.Ratcliffe, J., Flynn, T., Terlich, F., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Sawyer, M. (2012). Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: An application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Pharmacoeconomics, 30, 713–727. https://doi.org/10.2165/11597900-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2012). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: An assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. Value Health, 15, 1092–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.07.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chen, G., Flynn, T., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., Huynh, E., Sawyer, M., Roberts, R., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). Assessing the health-related quality of life of Australian adolescents: An empirical comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y instruments. Value Health, 18, 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Blake, H., Quirk, H., Leighton, P., Randell, T., Greening, J., Guo, B., et al. (2016). Feasibility of an online intervention (STAK-D) to promote physical activity in children with type 1 diabetes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17(1), 583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1719-0.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Furber, G., & Segal, L. (2015). The validity of the Child Health Utility instrument (CHU9D) as a routine outcome measure for use in child and adolescent mental health services. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0218-4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Frew, E. J., Pallan, M., Lancashire, E., Hemming, K., & Adab, P. (2015). Is utility-based quality of life associated with overweight in children? Evidence from the UK WAVES randomised controlled study. BMC Pediatrics, 15(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0526-1.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Xu, F., Chen, G., Stevens, K., Zhou, H., Qi, S., Wang, Z., Hong, X., Chen, X., Yang, H., Wang, C., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014). Measuring and valuing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents in mainland China—A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 9, e89222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089222.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ratcliffe, J., Huynh, E., Chen, G., Stevens, K., Swait, J., Brazier, J., Sawyer, M., Roberts, R., & Flynn, T. (2016). Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm. Social Science and Medicine, 157, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Chen, G., Xu, F., Huynh, E., Wang, Z., Li, C., Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2016). Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Estimation of a Chinese adolescent-specific tariff. Quality of Life Research, 25(S1), 23–24.Google Scholar
- 19.Chen, G., Huynh, E., Xu, F., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., Swait, J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2017). OP55 Health technology assessment in children and adolescents: Adolescent preferences for Child Health Utility 9D health states. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 33(S1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646231700143x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chen, G., Xu, F., Huynh, E., Wang, Z., Li, C., Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2018). Developing a Chinese-specific adolescent tariff for the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics Research Paper 96, Monash University.Google Scholar
- 22.Huang, Y., Zhong, X. N., Li, Q. Y., Xu, D., Zhang, X. L., Feng, C., Yang, G. X., Bo, Y. Y., & Deng, B. (2015). Health-related quality of life of the rural-China left-behind children or adolescents and influential factors: A cross-sectional study. Health and Quality Life Outcomes, 13, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0220-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hofsteenge, G. H., Weijs, P. J., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., de Wit, M., & Chinapaw, M. J. (2013). Effect of the Go4it multidisciplinary group treatment for obese adolescents on health related quality of life: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 13, 939. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-939.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage. Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- 30.Conner-Spady, B. L., Marshall, D. A., Bohm, E., Dunbar, M. J., Loucks, L., Khudairy, A. A., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Quality of Life Research, 24(7), 1775–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0910-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Cheung, P. W. H., Wong, C. K. H., Samartzis, D., Luk, K. D. K., Lam, C. L. K., Cheung, K. M. C., et al. (2016). Psychometric validation of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) in Chinese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disorders, 11, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0083-x.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Man, Y., Mengmeng, L., Lezhi, L., Ting, M., & Jingping, Z. (2017). The psychological problems and related influential factors of left-behind adolescents (LBA) in Hunan, China: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Equity in Health, 16(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0639-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Canaway, A. G., & Frew, E. J. (2013). Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6–7 years: A comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y—the WAVES pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0119-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Petersen, K. D., Chen, G., Mpundu-Kaambwa, C., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2018). Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescent populations: An empirical comparison of the CHU9D and the PedsQL™ 4.0 Short Form 15. Patient, 11(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0265-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar