The ‘new normal’: relativity of quality of life judgments in individuals with bipolar disorder—a qualitative study
Quality of life (QoL) is increasingly a target of interventions for bipolar disorders (BD). While the subjective experience of consumers is often elevated as central to the construct of QoL in BD, limited investigation in this area means subjective QoL remains poorly understood. The present qualitative study seeks to address this by investigating how people with BD appraise the quality of their lives in the context of a QoL self-management intervention.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 individuals who had participated in a self-management intervention for improving QoL in BD. Individuals were questioned about experiences of the intervention and perceptions of their QoL. Thematic analysis was used to explore participants’ appraisal of their QoL.
An overarching theme concerned the intrinsic relativity of subjective QoL: individuals located QoL as relative to self, others and possible futures. Incorporating illness-related reference points for QoL (‘given my circumstances…’) was associated with perceptions of improved QoL. Deliberately modifying reference points for QoL was perceived as self-compassionate.
The present study generates novel hypotheses about how individuals with BD make sense of their QoL. Data suggest that individuals located their QoL relative to a variety of reference points, use of which was flexible. In accord with gap theories of QoL, individuals experienced acceptance of illness impacts as improving subjective sense of QoL. Rather than ‘settling for’ a lower standard of QoL, individuals experienced these changes as adaptive and positive. Findings are discussed in relation to the measurement and amelioration of QoL in BD.
KeywordsBipolar disorder Psychiatric Recovery model Response shift Quality of life Qualitative
Quality of life
This study was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research Knowledge to Action Grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 8.Haarig, F., Berndt, C., Kühnert, M., Fuchs, S., Bräunig, P., & Mühlig, S. (2016). What is important to patients? Determination of patient-centered therapeutic goals in the treatment of bipolar disorders. Zeitschrift fur Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 64(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Michalak, E. E., Hole, R., Livingston, J. D., Murray, G., Parikh, S. V., Lapsley, S., & McBride, S. (2012). Improving care and wellness in bipolar disorder: Origins, evolution and future directions of a collaborative knowledge exchange network. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-6-16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Murray, G., Leitan, N. D., Thomas, N., Michalak, E. E., Johnson, S. L., Jones, S., et al. (2017). Towards recovery-oriented psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder: Quality of life outcomes, stage-sensitive treatments, and mindfulness mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 52, 148–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Michalak, E. E., Morton, E. M., Barnes, S. J., Hole, R., CREST.BD, & Murray, G. (2018). If you build it, will they come? A mixed-methods study of online knowledge translation strategies for bipolar disorder (in preparation)Google Scholar
- 17.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- 23.Mechanic, D. (2006). Organisation of care and quality of life of persons with serious and persistent mental illness. In H. Katschnig, H. Freeman & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Quality of life in mental disorders (2nd edn., pp. 309–320). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 24.Katschnig, H. (2006). How useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry? In H. Katschnig, H. Freeman & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Quality of life in mental disorders (2nd edn., pp. 3–17). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 25.Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2016). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (3rd edn.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 26.Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar