Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1269–1275 | Cite as

Association of midlife value priorities with health-related quality of life, frailty and mortality among older men: a 26-year follow-up of the Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS)

  • Annele Urtamo
  • Hannu Kautiainen
  • Kaisu H. Pitkälä
  • Timo E. Strandberg
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Personal values influence behavior and decision making, but their long-term associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), frailty, and mortality are less clear. We studied these associations from midlife to old age in a 26-year follow-up of the Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS) cohort.

Methods

In 1974, 1320 clinically healthy men (born 1919–1934) reported in a 12-item questionnaire their personal values. In 2000, a mailed questionnaire, including assessment of HRQoL with RAND-36 (SF-36) instrument, was sent to survivors, and 1025 men responded. In 2000, the presence of phenotypic frailty was assessed using modified Fried criteria including indicators of shrinking, physical weakness, exhaustion, and physical inactivity. Mortality through December 31, 2000 was verified from national registries.

Results

Using a factor analysis, the data of the 12-item questionnaire of personal values were loaded in 3 factors: valuing health (“Health”), enjoyable and varying life (“Enjoyment”), and comfort and work-oriented life (“Work-life-balance”). Adjusted for age, we found a significant positive association between valuing “Health” in midlife and RAND-36 domains of Physical functioning (p = .032) and Vitality (p = .005) in old age. “Health” also predicted less frailty (p = .008), and “Enjoyment” was associated with higher mortality (p = .017).

Conclusions

Value priorities of men assessed in midlife had long-term associations with HRQoL and frailty in old age, and they may also predict mortality.

Keywords

Personal values RAND-36 Functional aging Prevention Disability 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by Helsinki University Hospital VTR (EVO)—funding and Academy of Finland (311492).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Ethical approval by the Ethical committee of the Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture.  https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aavik, T., & Dobewall, H. (2017). Where is the location of “health” in the human values system? Evidence from Estonia. Social Indicators Research, 131(3), 1145–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1287-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sortheix, F. M., Olakivi, A., & Helkama, K. (2013). Values, life events, and health: A study in a Finnish rural community. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(4), 331–346.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sortheix, F. M., & Lonnqvist, J.-E. (2014). Personal value priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 282–299.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113504621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aavik, T., Aavik, A., & Punab, M. (2014). Personal values that support and counteract utilization of a screening test for prostate cancer. Behavioral Medicine, 40(1), 22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2013.831805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahola, S. (2015). Human values and non-adherence to doctors’ instructions across Europe. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(4), 214–225.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobewall, H., Tark, R., & Aavik, T. (2017). Health as a value and its association with health-related quality of life, mental health, physical health, and subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1–14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., et al. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriquez-Manas, L., Féart, C., Mann, G., Vina, J., Chatterji, S., et al. (2012). Searching for an operational definition on frailty: A Delphi method based consensus statement. The frailty operative definition – Consensus conference project. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68(1), 62–67.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lafortune, L., Martin, S., Kelly, S., Kuhn, I., Remes, O., Cowan, A., & Brayne, C. (2016). Behavioural risk factors in mid-life associated with successful ageing, disability, dementia and frailty in later life: A rapid systematic review. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0144405.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strandberg, A. Y., Strandberg, T. E., Stenholm, S., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkälä, K., & Tilvis, R. S. (2014). Low midlife blood pressure, survival, comorbidity, and health-related quality of life in old age: The Helsinki Businessmen Study. Journal of Hypertension, 32(9), 1797–1804.  https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Savela, S. L., Koistinen, P., Stenholm, S., et al. (2013). Leisure-time physical activity in midlife is related to old age frailty. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68(11), 1433–1438.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyttinen, L., Strandberg, T. E., Strandberg, A. Y., et al. (2011). Effect of cholesterol on mortality and quality of life up to a 46-year follow-up. American Journal of Cardiology, 108(5), 677–681.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strandberg, A. Y., Strandberg, T. E., Pitkälä, K., Salomaa, V. V., Tilvis, R. S., & Miettinen, T. A. (2008). The effect of smoking in midlife on health-related quality of life in old age: A 26-year prospective study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(18), 1968–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.18.1968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strandberg, T. E., Strandberg, A. Y., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkälä, K., Tilvis, R. S., & Miettinen, T. A. (2007). The association between weight gain up to midlife, 30-year mortality, and quality of life in older men. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(20), 2260–2261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strandberg, A. Y., Strandberg, T. E., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkälä, K., Häppölä, O., & Miettinen, T. A. (2004). A follow-up study found that cardiovascular risk in middle age predicted mortality and quality of life in old age. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(4), 415–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strandberg, A. Y., Strandberg, T. E., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkälä, K., & Miettinen, T. A. (2004). Alcohol consumption, 29-year total mortality, and quality of life in men in old age. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 80(5), 1366–1371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strandberg, T. E., Sirola, J., Pitkälä, K. H., Tilvis, R. S., Strandberg, A. Y., & Stenholm, S. (2012). Association of midlife obesity and cardiovascular risk with old age frailty: A 26-year follow-up of initially healthy men. International Journal of Obesity, 36(9), 1153–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sirola, J., Pitkala, K. H., Tilvis, R. S., Miettinen, T. A., & Strandberg, T. E. (2011). Definition of frailty in older men according to questionnaire data (RAND-36/SF-36): The Helsinki Business Study. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 15(9), 783–787.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-011-0131-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huohvanainen, E., Strandberg, A., Stenholm, S., Pitkälä, K., Tilvis, R., & Strandberg, T. E. (2016). Association of self-rated health in midlife with mortality and old age frailty: A 26-year follow-up of initially healthy men. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 71(7), 923–928.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strandberg, T. E., Salomaa, V., Strandberg, A. Y., Vanhanen, H., Sarna, S., Pitkälä, K., et al. (2015). Cohort profile: The Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(4), 1074–1074h.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miettinen, T. A., Huttunen, J. K., Naukkarinen, V., Stranberg, T. E., Mattila, S., Kumlin, T., & Sarna, S. (1985). Multifactorial primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in middle-aged men: Risk factor changes, incidence, and mortality. JAMA, 254(15), 2097–2102.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03360150073027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keys, A., Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H., et al. (1972). Probability of middle-aged men developing coronary heart disease in five years. Circulation, 45, 815–828.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.45.4.815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenberg, M. (1957). Occupations and values. Glecoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1651–1668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aalto, A.-M., Aro, A. R., & Teperi, J. (1999). RAND-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life: Reliability, construct validity, and reference values in the Finnish general population. Helsinki: Stakes; Research Reports No.101.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 324(7351), 1417–1422.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dubuc, N., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Kooyoomjian, J. T., & Jette, A. M. (2004). Function and disability in late life: Comparison of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument to the Short-Form-36 and the London Handicap Scale. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(6), 362–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pine, G., & Innis, G. (1987). Cultural and individual work values. The Career Development Quarterly, 35, 279–287.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1987.tb00926.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smithers, A. (1969). A structural study of the occupational value orientations of engineering students. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 21(50), 129–134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057876980000211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to well-being: Healthy values, valued goal attainment, and environmental congruence. Positive Psychology in Practice, 68–85.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch5.
  38. 38.
    Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177–198.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200003/04)30:23.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berson, Y., & Oreg, S. (2016). The role of school principals in shaping children’s values. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1539–1549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abel, T. (1991). Measuring health lifestyles in a comparative analysis: Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annele Urtamo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hannu Kautiainen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kaisu H. Pitkälä
    • 1
    • 2
  • Timo E. Strandberg
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of General Practice and Primary Health CareUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Unit of Primary Health CareHelsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of Helsinki, ClinicumHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Center for Life Course Health ResearchUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations