Skip to main content

Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument

Quality of Life Research volume 28, pages 1245–1253 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported health-related quality of life is a complementary healthcare outcome and important when assessing treatment efficacy. Using COSMIN methodological recommendations, this study evaluates the validity and reliability of a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, the HeartQoL questionnaire (Danish version) in a sample of patients following heart valve surgery.

Design

This project involved a cross-sectional validity study and a test–retest reliability study.

Methods

Eligible patients completed the HeartQoL, the SF-36 health survey questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale following heart valve surgery. Construct validity was tested using a priori hypotheses. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. An independent sample of patients participated in the test–retest study and reproducibility was determined with relative [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] and absolute reliability [standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC)].

Results

Internal consistency was high with Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.87. ICC was 0.86–0.92. SEM ranged from 0.17 to 0.26 points and SDC ranged from 0.5 to 0.7 points. Construct validity was confirmed with 87% of all a priori hypotheses for predicted variables.

Conclusions

The HeartQoL questionnaire demonstrates acceptable construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reproducibility in patients following heart valve surgery. Future studies should focus on assessing the responsiveness of the HeartQoL questionnaire over time and following heart valve surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Supino, P. G., Borer, J. S., Preibisz, J., & Bornstein, A. (2006). The epidemiology of valvular heart disease: A growing public health problem. Heart Failure Clinics, 2(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2006.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nkomo, V. T., Gardin, J. M., Skelton, T. N., Gottdiener, J. S., Scott, C. G., & Enriquez-Sarano, M. (2006). Burden of valvular heart diseases: A population-based study. Lancet, 368(9540), 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69208-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blauwet, L. A., & Miller, F. A. Jr. (2014). Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic heart valves. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 57(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg, S. K., Zwisler, A. D., Pedersen, B. D., Haase, K., & Sibilitz, K. L. (2013). Patient experiences of recovery after heart valve replacement: Suffering weakness, struggling to resume normality. BMC Nursing, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-12-23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapum, J., Angus, J. E., Peter, E., & Watt-Watson, J. (2011). Patients’ discharge experiences: Returning home after open-heart surgery. Heart and Lung, 40(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anker, S. D., Agewall, S., Borggrefe, M., Calvert, M., Jaime Caro, J., Cowie, M. R., et al. (2014). The importance of patient-reported outcomes: A call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials. European Heart Journal, 35(30), 2001–2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rumsfeld, J. S., Alexander, K. P., Goff, D. C. Jr., Graham, M. M., Ho, P. M., Masoudi, F. A., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular health: The importance of measuring patient-reported health status: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 127(22), 2233–2249. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oldridge, N., Hofer, S., McGee, H., Conroy, R., Doyle, F., & Saner, H. (2014). The HeartQoL: Part I. Development of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 21(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312450544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oldridge, N., Hofer, S., McGee, H., Conroy, R., Doyle, F., & Saner, H. (2014). The HeartQoL: Part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 21(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312450545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristensen, M. S., Zwisler, A. D., Berg, S. K., Zangger, G., Gronset, C. N., Risom, S. S., et al. (2016). Validating the HeartQoL questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23(14), 1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316638485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zangger, G., Zwisler, A. D., Berg, K., Kristensen, S., Gronset, M. S., Uddin, C. N., J., et al (2018). Psychometric properties of HeartQoL, a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, in Danish implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 25(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317733074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Hofer, S., Oldridge, N., Kotseva, K., Maggioni, A. P., et al. (2016). Validity and reliability of the HeartQoL questionnaire in a large sample of stable coronary patients: The EUROASPIRE IV Study of the European Society of Cardiology. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23(7), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315604837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynge, E., Sandegaard, J. L., & Rebolj, M. (2011). The Danish National Patient Register. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(7 Suppl), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseasess, 40(5), 373–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sibilitz, K. L., Berg, S. K., Hansen, T. B., Risom, S. S., Rasmussen, T. B., Hassager, C., et al. (2013). Effect of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation after heart valve surgery (CopenHeartVR): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Trials, 14, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vet, H. C. W. D. (2011). Measurement in medicine: A practical guide (Practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware, J. E. Jr. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3130–3139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bjorner, J. B., Damsgaard, M. T., Watt, T., & Groenvold, M. (1998). Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1001–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–a review of validation data and clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42(1), 17–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2017). Thanks coefficient alpha, we still need you!. Educational and Psychological Measurement, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., Ronkko, M., & McIntosh, C. N. (2018). A cautionary note on the finite sample behavior of maximal reliability. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hofer, S., Benzer, W., Schussler, G., von Steinbuchel, N., & Oldridge, N. B. (2003). Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 12(2), 199–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leal, A., Paiva, C., Hofer, S., Amado, J., Gomes, L., & Oldridge, N. (2005). Evaluative and discriminative properties of the Portuguese MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2335–2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-7213-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vandereyt, F., Dendale, P., Vanhees, L., Roosen, J., Hofer, S., & Oldridge, N. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Flemish version of the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire. Acta Cardiologica, 67(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.2143/ac.67.1.2146563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Polit, D. F. (2014). Getting serious about test-retest reliability: A critique of retest research and some recommendations. Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0632-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, W. L., Chinna, K., Bulgiba, A., Abdullah, K. L., Abidin, I. Z., & Hofer, S. (2016). Test-retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 25(2), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1097-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the respondents for their participation and Jamal Uddin for assisting in data entry.

Funding

The study was financially supported by The Danish Council for Strategic Research (10-092790), The Danish Heart Foundation, Edith and Olfert Dines Hansen Foundation (8868MT/IV), and the Research Council of the Region Zealand (12–000095/jun2014). The funding agencies had no influence on the interpretation of results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Charlotte N. Grønset

  2. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Lau C. Thygesen & Marie S. Kristensen

  3. The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Odense, Denmark

    Selina Kikkenborg Berg

  4. The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care (REHPA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Graziella Zangger & Ann-Dorthe Zwisler

  5. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Graziella Zangger & Ann-Dorthe Zwisler

  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Kirstine L. Sibilitz

  7. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Susanne S. Pedersen

  8. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Susanne S. Pedersen

  9. College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Neil B. Oldridge

Authors
  1. Charlotte N. Grønset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lau C. Thygesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Selina Kikkenborg Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Graziella Zangger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marie S. Kristensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kirstine L. Sibilitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Susanne S. Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Neil B. Oldridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ann-Dorthe Zwisler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte N. Grønset.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Professor Neil Oldridge is a co-developer of the HeartQoL with no competing interest to report by the other authors.

Ethical approval

The Danish Data Protection Agency approved the survey data (File Number: 2013-41-1643) and all local confidentiality and privacy requirements were met.

Informed consent

Danish laws for register-based research do not require signed informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grønset, C.N., Thygesen, L.C., Berg, S.K. et al. Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument. Qual Life Res 28, 1245–1253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-02098-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-02098-1

Keywords

  • Heart valve surgery
  • Health-related quality of life questionnaires
  • HeartQoL
  • Measurement properties