Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1099–1108 | Cite as

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire in college students

  • Lisha Dai
  • Robin Bailey
  • Yunlong Deng
Article

Abstract

Purpose

In order to explain the potential mechanism that might motivate and maintain health anxiety (HA), researchers have developed several measures to assess the level of HA and to identify related cognitions and personality features. However, such instruments typically measure general metacognitions [e.g., the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30)], thereby compromising the degree of sensitivity and specificity of measurement as applied to HA-related metacognitions. To address that issue, the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire (MCQ-HA) was designed especially for measuring metacognitive beliefs specific to HA. Because a Chinese version of MCQ-HA may be helpful in improving our understanding of HA in a Chinese population, in the current study we sought to develop a Chinese version of the MCQ-HA (CMCQ-HA).

Methods

We translated the MCQ-HA into Chinese with consideration of cultural diversity. For evaluation of its validity and stability, a sample of 1290 Chinese college students answered the CMCQ-HA, the Short Health Anxiety Inventory, the MCQ-30, and the Neuroticism scale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. 292 students of them answered the CMCQ-HA twice.

Results

Good internal consistency (α = 0.81) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.70) of the CMCQ-HA was presented. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated a three-factor structure: beliefs about biased thinking, beliefs that thoughts can cause illness, and beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. Convergent validity, divergent validity, and incremental validity all were acceptable. Measurement invariance across gender was established.

Conclusions

The CMCQ-HA shows promise for the measurement of specific HA-related metacognitions in Chinese populations.

Keywords

Health anxiety Metacognition Reliability and validity Chinese population 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by the New Xiangya Talent Project of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Grant No. 20150302).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board of the Third Xiangya Hospital in Hunan approved the study (2017-S208).

References

  1. 1.
    Abramowitz, J. S., Deacon, B. J., & Valentiner, D. P. (2007). The short health anxiety inventory: Psychometric properties and construct validity in a non-clinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(6), 871–883.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9058-1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Creed, F., & Barsky, A. (2004). A systematic review of the epidemiology of somatisation disorder and hypochondriasis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56(4), 391–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00622-6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salkovskis, P. M., & Warwick, H. M. (1986). Morbid preoccupations, health anxiety and reassurance: A cognitive-behavioural approach to hypochondriasis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24(5), 597–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sunderland, M., Newby, J. M., & Andrews, G. (2013). Health anxiety in Australia: Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service use. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(1), 56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103960.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noyes, R., Happel, R. L., & Yagla, S. J. (1999). Correlates of hypochondriasis in a nonclinical population. Psychosomatics, 40, 461–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2005). The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, B. J., Borger, S. C., Asmundson, G. J. G., & Taylor, S. (2000). Dimensions of hypochondriasis and the five factor model of personality. Personality and individual differences, 29, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams, P. G. (2004). The psychopathology of self-assessed health: A cognitive approach to health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Cognitive Therapy Research, 28(5), 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marcus, D. K., Gurley, J. R., Marchi, M. M., & Bauer, C. (2007). Cognitive and perceptual variables in hypochondriasis and health anxiety: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(2), 127–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norris, L., A. & Marcus, D. K. (2014). Cognition in health anxiety and hypochondriasis: Recent advances. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 10(1), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barsky, A. J., & Wyshak, G. (1990). Hypochondriasis and somatosensory amplification. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 157(3), 404–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pilowsky, I. (1967). Dimension of hypochondriasis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 89–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Warwick, H., & Clark, D. M. (2002). The Health Anxiety Inventory: Development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychological Medicine, 32(5), 843–853.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702005822.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Janzen, J. A., Kehler, M. D., Leclerc, J. A., Sharpe, D., & Bourgault-Fagnou, M. D. (2012). Core cognitions related to health anxiety in self-reported medical and non-medical samples. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9339-3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2016). Is metacognition a causal moderator of the relationship between catastrophic misinterpretation and health anxiety? A prospective study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 78, 43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.01.002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2016). The contribution of metacognitive beliefs and dysfunctional illness beliefs in predicting health anxiety: An evaluation of the metacognitive versus the cognitive models. Clinical Psychologist, 20(3), 129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12078.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2015). Metacognitive beliefs moderate the relationship between catastrophic misinterpretation and health anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 34, 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melli, G., Carraresi, C., Poli, A., & Bailey, R. (2016). The role of metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 80–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short from of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(4), 385–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2015). Development and initial validation of a measure of metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety: The MCQ-HA. Psychiatry Research, 230(3), 871–877.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.035.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rachman, S. (2012). Health anxiety disorders: A cognitive construal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(7–8), 502–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.001.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fulton, J. J., Marcus, D. K., & Merkey, T. (2011). Irrational health beliefs and health anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 527–538.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20769.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Looper, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2001). Hypochondriacal concerns in a community population. Psychological Medicine, 31(4), 577–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, S., Ng, K. L., Ma, Y. L., Tsang, A., & Kwok, K. P. (2011). A general population study of the Chinese Whiteley-7 index in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 71(6), 387–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.05.013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su, X., Li, Z., Jiang, C., & Ma, Y. (2016). The cognitive characteristics of hypochondriasis and the development of related measurements. Journal of Psychiatry, 29(6), 477–480.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, R., Li, G., & Mao, S. (2015) The reliability and validity of a Chinese-version Short Health Anxiety Inventory: An investigation of university students. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 1739.  https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S83501.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(3), 318–325.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carciofo, R., Song, N., Du, F., Wang, M. M., & Zhang, K. (2017). Metacognitive beliefs mediate the relationship between mind wandering and negative affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.033.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mingyi, Q., Guocheng, W., Rongchun, Z., & Shen, Z. (2000). Development of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32(3), 317–323.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Naunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, 32(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Samuel, D. B., South, S. C., & Griffin, S. A. (2015). Factorial invariance of the five-factor model rating form across gender. Assessment, 22(1), 65–75.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114536772.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ambrosio, L., Portillo, M. C., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., Martinez-Castrillo, J. C., Rodriguez-Violante, M., & Serrano-Duenas, M., et al. (2016). Satisfaction with Life Scale (SLS-6): First validation study in Parkinson’s disease population. Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 25, 52–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.02.012.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zwaanswijk, W., Veen, V. C., & Vedder, P. (2016). The youth psychopathic traits inventory: A bifactor model, dimensionality, and measurement invariance. Assessment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116632340.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shrout, P. E. (1998). Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7(3), 301–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dancey, C., & Reidy, J. (2004). Statistics without maths for psychology: Using SPSS for windows. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Enns, M. W., & Cox, B. J. (1997). Personality dimensions and depression: Review and commentary. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(3), 274–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379704200305.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, The Third Xiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Health, BB235University of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations