Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 879–890 | Cite as

Predictors of self-reported health-related quality of life according to the EQ-5D-Y in chronically ill children and adolescents with asthma, diabetes, and juvenile arthritis: longitudinal results

  • Christiane Otto
  • Dana Barthel
  • Fionna Klasen
  • Sandra Nolte
  • Matthias Rose
  • Ann-Katrin Meyrose
  • Marcus Klein
  • Ute Thyen
  • Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important patient-reported outcome in clinical and health research. The EQ-5D-Y assesses child and adolescent HRQoL by five items on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression as well as a visual analogue scale (VAS) on the current health state. This study investigates predictors of self-reported HRQoL according to the EQ-5D-Y in chronically ill children and adolescents using longitudinal data.

Methods

Data from the German Kids-CAT study on children and adolescents with asthma, diabetes, and juvenile arthritis gathered over a period of six months were analyzed (n = 310; 7–17 years old; 48% female). Self-, parent-, and pediatrician-reported data were collected from June 2013 to October 2014. Generalized linear mixed models and linear mixed models served to examine effects of socio-demographic as well as disease- and health-specific predictors on the items as well as on the VAS of the EQ-5D-Y.

Results

Ceiling effects for the EQ-5D-Y indicated low burden of disease in the analyzed sample. Longitudinal analyses revealed associations between less health complaints and better HRQoL for all investigated HRQoL domains. Further, age- and gender-specific effects, and associations of better disease control, longer duration of the disease and less mental health problems with better HRQoL were found.

Conclusions

Subjective health complaints and mental health problems should be considered in the care of children and adolescents with asthma, diabetes, and juvenile arthritis. Future research should suggest administering the items of the EQ-5D-Y with five instead of three response options, and investigate HRQoL over a longer period.

Keywords

Quality of life Children Adolescents EQ-5D-Y Chronic illness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all children, adolescents and their parents, who participated in the Kids-CAT study. Further, we thank the study nurses Anja Bünte and Andrea Knaak, as well as all involved pediatricians for their valuable contributions to the Kids-CAT project. Moreover, we thank Dr. Claus Barkmann for statistical advice, as well as  all student assistants and interns for their support. The work on the present publication was financially supported by the EuroQol Foundation, but the views expressed by the authors in the present publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the EuroQol Group.

Funding

This Kids-CAT study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant No. 0010-01GY1111). The present manuscript was funded by the EuroQol Research Foundation (EQ Project 2016270).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11136_2017_1753_MOESM1_ESM.docx (109 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 109 KB)
11136_2017_1753_MOESM2_ESM.docx (45 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 45 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knott, R. J., Black, N., Hollingsworth, B., & Lorgelly, P. K. (2017). Response-Scale Heterogeneity in the EQ-5D. Health Economics, 26(3), 387–394.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nolan, C. M., Longworth, L., Lord, J., Canavan, J. L., Jones, S. E., Kon, S. S., et al. (2016). The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference. Thorax, 71(6), 493–500.  https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207782.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devlin, N. J., & Brooks, R. (2017). EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, present and future. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 15(2), 127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burstrom, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., et al. (2010). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: A child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 875–886.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9648-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EuroQolResearchFoundation (2017). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: A child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. http://www.euroqol.org/eq-5d-products/eq-5d-y-youth.html. Accessed 17 October 2017 2017.
  7. 7.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burstrom, K., Cavrini, G., et al. (2010). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 887–897.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9649-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jelsma, J. (2010). A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D-Y health-related quality of life instruments in South African children. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 33(2), 172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32832bb0f7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burstrom, K., Bartonek, A., Brostrom, E. W., Sun, S., & Egmar, A. C. (2014). EQ-5D-Y as a health-related quality of life measure in children and adolescents with functional disability in Sweden: Testing feasibility and validity. Acta Paediatrica, 103(4), 426–435.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robles, N., Rajmil, L., Rodriguez-Arjona, D., Azuara, M., Codina, F., Raat, H., et al. (2015). Development of the web-based Spanish and Catalan versions of the Euroqol 5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y) and comparison of results with the paper version. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 13, 72,  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0271-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noyes, J., & Edwards, R. T. (2011). EQ-5D for the assessment of health-related quality of life and resource allocation in children: a systematic methodological review. Value Health, 14(8), 1117–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janssens, A., Rogers, M., Gumm, R., Jenkinson, C., Tennant, A., Logan, S., et al. (2016). Measurement properties of multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures in neurodisability: a systematic review of evaluation studies. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 58(5), 437–451.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bergfors, S., Astrom, M., Burstrom, K., & Egmar, A. C. (2015). Measuring health-related quality of life with the EQ-5D-Y instrument in children and adolescents with asthma. Acta Paediatrica, 104(2), 167–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eidt-Koch, D., Mittendorf, T., & Greiner, W. (2009). Cross-sectional validity of the EQ-5D-Y as a generic health outcome instrument in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Germany. Bmc Pediatrics.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jonsson, M., Bergstrom, A., Egmar, A. C., Hedlin, G., Lind, T., & Kull, I. (2016). Asthma during adolescence impairs health-related quality of life. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 4(1), 144–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murillo, M., Bel, J., Perez, J., Corripio, R., Carreras, G., Herrero, X., et al. (2017). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and its associated factors in children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). Bmc Pediatrics, 17(1), 16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0788-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Europe, T. K. G. (2006). The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires. Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents—Handbook. Lengerich: Papst Science Publisher.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer-Moock, S., Moock, J., Morgenroth, A., & Kohlmann, T. Comparing responsiveness of the child-friendly version of the EuroQol-questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y) with population specific instruments (KINDL-R and KIDSCREEN-10) in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. 28th Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group, Oxford, September 2011.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klaassen, R. J., Krahn, M., Gaboury, I., Hughes, J., Anderson, R., Grundy, P., et al. (2010). Evaluating the ability to detect change of health-related quality of life in children with Hodgkin disease. Cancer, 116(6), 1608–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Rapoff, M. A., Kamps, J. L., & Olson, N. (2004). The PedsQL™ in pediatric asthma: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ generic core scales and asthma module. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27(3), 297–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5(1), 43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wagner, V. M., Müller–Godeffroy, E., von Sengbusch, S., Häger, S., & Thyen, U. (2005). Age, metabolic control and type of insulin regime influences health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. European Journal of Pediatrics, 164(8), 491–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lundberg, V., Lindh, V., Eriksson, C., Petersen, S., & Eurenius, E. (2012). Health-related quality of life in girls and boys with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: self-and parental reports in a cross-sectional study. Pediatric Rheumatology, 10(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalyva, E., Malakonaki, E., Eiser, C., & Mamoulakis, D. (2011). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): self and parental perceptions. Pediatric Diabetes, 12(1), 34–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lawrence, J. M., Joyce, P., Black, M. H., Anderson, A., Hood, K., Imperatore, G., et al. (2012). Demographic and clinical correlates of diabetes-related quality of life among youth with type 1 diabetes. The Journal of Pediatrics, 161(2), 201–207. e202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hassan, K., Loar, R., Anderson, B. J., & Heptulla, R. A. (2006). The role of socioeconomic status, depression, quality of life, and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. The Journal of Pediatrics, 149(4), 526–531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stahl-Pehe, A., Straßburger, K., Castillo, K., Bächle, C., Holl, R. W., Lange, K., et al. (2014). Quality of life in intensively treated youths with early-onset type 1 diabetes: a population-based survey. Pediatric Diabetes, 15(6), 436–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Everhart, R. S., & Fiese, B. H. (2009). Asthma severity and child quality of life in pediatric asthma: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(2), 162–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Naughton, M. J., Ruggiero, A. M., Lawrence, J. M., Imperatore, G., Klingensmith, G. J., Waitzfelder, B., et al. (2008). Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162(7), 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Svedberg, P., Eriksson, M., & Boman, E. (2013). Associations between scores of psychosomatic health symptoms and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fischer, K., Barthel, D., Otto, C., Thyen, U., Klein, M., Walter, O., et al. Application of the EQ-5D-Y in a clinical study: How children and adolescents with chronic conditions value HRQoL. 22nd Annual Conference—International Society for Quality of Life Research, Vancouver, BC, October 2015.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Devine, J., Otto, C., Rose, M., Barthel, D., Fischer, F., Mülhan, H., et al. (2015). A new computerized adaptive test advancing the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children: the Kids-CAT. Quality of Life Research, 24(4), 871–884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barthel, D., Fischer, K. I., Nolte, S., Otto, C., Meyrose, A. K., Reisinger, S., et al. (2016). Implementation of the Kids-CAT in clinical settings: a newly developed computer-adaptive test to facilitate the assessment of patient-reported outcomes of children and adolescents in clinical practice in Germany. Quality of Life Research, 25(3), 585–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A.-K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lampert, T., Kroll, L. E., Müters, S., & Stolzenberg, H. (2013). Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie “Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell” (GEDA). Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 56(1), 131–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lampert, T., Müters, S., Stolzenberg, H., Kroll, L. E., & Group, K. S. (2014). Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der KiGGS-Studie. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 57(7), 762–770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schenk, L., Bau, A.-M., Borde, T., Butler, J., Lampert, T., Neuhauser, H., et al. (2006). Mindestindikatorensatz zur Erfassung des Migrationsstatus. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 49(9), 853–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haugland, S., Wold, B., Stevenson, J., Aaroe, L. E., & Woynarowska, B. (2001). Subjective health complaints in adolescence: A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. The European Journal of Public Health, 11(1), 4–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., Ottova, V., Hintzpeter, B., Hillebrandt, D., Saier, U., Moeller, N., et al. (2012). Gesundheitsverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Die WHO-Jugendgesundheitsstudie für Hamburg. [Health behaviour of children and adolescents: The WHO-youth health study for Hamburg (Germany)]. Lengerich: Pabst Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Woerner, W., Becker, A., Friedrich, C., Klasen, H., Goodman, R., & Rothenberger, A. (2002). Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. [Normal values and evaluation of the German parents’ version of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Results of a representative field study]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 30, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen, G., Flynn, T., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., Huynh, E., Sawyer, M., et al. (2015). Assessing the health-related quality of life of australian adolescents: An empirical comparison of the child health utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y instruments. Value in Health, 18(4), 432–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Scott, D., Ferguson, G. D., & Jelsma, J. (2017). The use of the EQ-5D-Y health related quality of life outcome measure in children in the Western Cape, South Africa: psychometric properties, feasibility and usefulness—a longitudinal, analytical study. Health Qual Life Outcomes.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0590-3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Wetzel, R., Nickel, J., & Bullinger, M. (2006). Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 24(12), 1199–1220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Landfeldt, E., Lindgren, P., Bell, C. F., Guglieri, M., Straub, V., Lochmuller, H., et al. (2016). Health-related quality of life in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a multinational, cross-sectional study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58(5), 508–515.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5(4), 1–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sanders, L. M., Shaw, J. S., Guez, G., Baur, C., & Rudd, R. (2009). Health literacy and child health promotion: implications for research, clinical care, and public policy. Pediatrics, 124 Suppl 3, S306–S314,  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1162G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Research Unit Child Public Health, Center for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center of Internal Medicine and DermatologyCharité - Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Population Health Strategic Research Centre, School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  4. 4.Quantitative Health Sciences, Outcomes Measurement ScienceUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  5. 5.Department of PediatricsUniversity Medical Center Schleswig-HolsteinKielGermany
  6. 6.Hospital for Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations