Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short form (SF) of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT) for cancer patients.
Methods
Data for item reduction were derived from cancer patient data (n = 300) previously used to develop the original SAT. We used regression methods to select and score the new SAT-SF. To assess the instrument’s reliability and validity, we recruited another 354 cancer patients from the same hospitals who were older than 18 years and accustomed to using the web. All results were compared with that of the long-form SAT (original SAT).
Results
The SAT-SF used is the shorter version, a 30-item (from the original 91-item) instrument, to measure cancer patient’s health. The 30-item SAT-SF explained 97.7% of total variance of the full 91-item long-form SAT. All SAT-SF subscales demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency compared with the original SAT. The total short-form scores of the three SAT sets (SAT-Core, SAT-Preparation, SAT-Implementation) differentiated participant groups according to their stage of goal implementation and percentage of actions taken in the 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior. We found acceptable correlations between the three SAT-SF sets and the additional assessment tools compared with the original SAT.
Conclusions
The 30-item SAT-SF had a satisfactory internal consistency and validity for cancer patients with minimal loss of information compared with the original SAT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SAT-SF:
-
Smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form
- SAT-C:
-
SAT-core (SF-C), SAT-preparation (SF-P), and SAT-implementation (SF-I)
- SAT-P:
-
SAT-preparation
- SAT-I:
-
SAT-implementation
- SF-C:
-
Short-form SAT-core
- SF-P:
-
Short-form SAT-preparation
- SF-I:
-
Short-form SAT-implementation
References
Jemal, A., et al. (2009). Cancer statistics, 2009. C CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59(4), 225–249.
Kinsey, T., et al. (2008). Secular trends in mortality from common cancers in the United States by educational attainment, 1993–2001. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(14), 1003–1012.
Cheung, W. Y., Neville, B. A., & Earle, C. C. (2010). Associations among cancer survivorship discussions, patient and physician expectations, and receipt of follow-up care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(15), 2577–2583.
Snyder, C. F., et al. (2009). Prevention, screening, and surveillance care for breast cancer survivors compared with controls: Changes from 1998 to 2002. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 27(7), 1054–1061.
Grunfeld, E., & Earle, C. C. (2010). The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: Treatment through survivorship. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010(40), 25–30.
Park, S. M., et al. (2007). Prediagnosis smoking, obesity, insulin resistance, and second primary cancer risk in male cancer survivors: National Health Insurance Corporation Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 25(30), 4835–4843.
McCorkle, R., Lazenby, E. E., Schulman-Green, M., Schilling, D., Lorig, L. S., & Wagner, K. (2011). EH, Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. C CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50–62.
Basch, E., et al. (2014). Patient-reported outcome performance measures in oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice, 10(3), 209–211.
Yun, Y. H., et al. (2015) Patient-reported assessment of self-management strategies of health in cancer patients: Development and validation of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT). Psycho-Oncology, 24, 1723–1730.
Wong, G. K. C., et al. (2013). Development of a short form of stroke-specific quality of life scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 335(1), 204–209.
O’Connell, K. A., & Skevington, S. M. (2012). An international quality of life instrument to assess wellbeing in adults who are HIV-positive: A short form of the WHOQOL-HIV (31 items). AIDS and Behavior, 16(2), 452–460.
Bann, C. M., Fehnel, S. E., & Gagnon, D. D. (2003). Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF). PharmacoEconomics, 21(17), 1277–1290.
Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.
Fayers, P. M., et al. (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. Belgium: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Ostermann, T., et al. (2005). The Herdecke questionnaire on quality of life (HLQ): Validation of factorial structure and development of a short form within a naturopathy treated in-patient collective. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 40.
Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(201403):381–392
Covey, S. (2009). Seven Habits ® Profile: Self-scoring seven habits profile.
Yun, Y. H., et al. (2014). The association of self-leadership, health behaviors, and posttraumatic growth with health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 23(12), 1423–1430.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.
Holden, L., et al. (2014). Validation of the MOS Social Support Survey 6-item (MOS-SSS-6) measure with two large population-based samples of Australian women. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(10), 2849–2853.
O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30.
Mühlan, H., et al. (2008). Short forms of subjective quality of life assessments from cross-cultural studies for use in surveys with different populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15(3), 142–153.
Newcombe, P. A., Sheffield, J. K., & Chang, A. B. (2013). Parent cough-specific quality of life: Development and validation of a short form. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 131(4), 1069–1074.
Acknowledgements
We thank for Amanda Weiskoff from Bio Science Writers who provided language edition and C. Hyung Keun Park from Seoul National University Hospital who translated the SAT questionnaire into English version.
Funding
This study was funded by grants from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number 1320330); and the R&D Program for National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (Grant Number 20100028631).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YHY participated in the study design, provided financial support and study materials, collected and assembled the data, interpreted the analyses, participated in the sequence alignment, drafted the manuscript, and finally approved the paper. JYJ participated in the study design and coordination, collected study materials, conducted data analyses, and wrote the manuscript. JAS participated in the study design, collected study materials, and wrote the manuscript. JML participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. DYN participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. WSH participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. KJP participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. SYJ participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. JWP participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. HGW participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. EKC participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. HJK participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. KHJ participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. JIZ participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. SK participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. JEL participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. SJN participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. ESL participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. JHO participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. YWK participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. YTK participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. YMS participated in the design of the study, provided study materials and patients, collected and assembled the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yun, Y.H., Jung, J.Y., Sim, J.A. et al. Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 27, 347–354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1723-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1723-1