A method to create a standardized generic and condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure for patient care and healthcare improvement
- 869 Downloads
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are generic or condition-specific, are used for a number of reasons, including clinical care, clinical trials, and in national-level efforts to monitor the quality of health care delivery. Creating PROMs that meet different purposes without overburdening patients, healthcare systems, providers, and data systems is paramount. The objective of this study was to test a generalizable method to incorporate condition-specific issues into generic PROM measures as a first step to producing PROMs that efficiently provide a standardized score. This paper outlines the method and preliminary findings focused on a PROM for osteoarthritis of the knee (OA-K).
We used a mixed-methods approach and PROMIS® measures to test development of a combined generic and OA-K-specific PROM. Qualitative methods included patient focus groups and provider interviews to identify impacts of OA-K important to patients. We then conducted a thematic analysis and an item gap analysis: identified areas covered by existing generic PROMIS measures, identified “gap” areas not covered, compared gap areas to legacy instruments to verify relevance, and developed new items to address gaps. We then performed cognitive testing on new items and drafted an OA-K-specific instrument based on findings.
We identified 52 existing PROMIS items and developed 24 new items across 14 domains.
We developed a process for creating condition-specific instruments that bridge gaps in existing generic measures. If successful, the methodology will create instruments that efficiently gather the patient’s perspective while allowing health systems, researchers, and other interested parties to monitor and compare outcomes over time, conditions, and populations.
KeywordsPatient-reported outcome measure Healthcare quality Mixed methods Osteoarthritis of the knee
This work was supported by the Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute contract number ME-1303-5928. The authors wish to thank their valuable research partners in this work: Drs. Gene Nelson, Jill Gelow, Lynn Marshall, Taressa Fraze and Faraz Ahmad; and Brendin Beaulieu-Jones and Zabin Patel. We are especially grateful for the input of our patient and provider participants and for the guidance and advice from our Patient and Family Advisory Committee: Annette Jo Giarrante, Janet Trzaska, David Swanz, Jeff Gardner, Carol DuBois, Roger Arend and Linda Wilkinson.
- 4.National health service England. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/proms/. Accessed Oct 4 2016.
- 12.Rolfson, O., Wissig, S., van Maasakkers, L., Stowell, C., Ackerman, I., Ayers, D., et al. (2016). Defining an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group. Arthritis Care Research, 68(11), 1631–1639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Fitzsimmons, D., Johnson, C. D., George, S., Payne, S., Sandberg, A. A., Bassi, C., et al. (1999). Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 35(6), 939–941.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first 2 years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA, PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12–S20.Google Scholar
- 20.Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Beckmann, J. T., Hung, M., Bounsanga, J., Wylie, J. D., Granger, E. K., & Tashjian, R. Z. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 24(12), 1961–1967.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value in Health, 14(8), 967–977.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2—assessing respondent understanding. Value in Health, 14(8), 978–988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 29.Sociocultural Research Consultants L. (2015). Dedoose Version 6.1.18, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC (www.dedoose.com).
- 30.Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measures, 11(3), 304–314.Google Scholar
- 31.Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2011). Initial adult health item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Willis, G., Reeve, B.B., Barofsky, I. (2005). The use of cognitive interviewing techniques in quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessment. Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods and application, 610–622.Google Scholar
- 33.Correia, H. (2015). Translatability review for the national children’s study: guidelines and process. Chicago.Google Scholar