Abstract
Purpose
Most health outcome measures for chronic diseases do not incorporate specific health goals of patients and caregivers. To elicit patient-centered goals for dementia care, we conducted a qualitative study using focus groups of people with early-stage dementia and dementia caregivers.
Methods
We conducted 5 focus groups with 43 participants (7 with early-stage dementia and 36 caregivers); 15 participants were Spanish-speaking. Verbatim transcriptions were independently analyzed line-by-line by two coders using both deductive and inductive approaches. Coded texts were grouped into domains and developed into a goal inventory for dementia care.
Results
Participants identified 41 goals for dementia care within five domains (medical care, physical quality of life, social and emotional quality of life, access to services and supports, and caregiver support). Caregiver goals included ensuring the safety of the person with dementia and managing caregiving stress. Participants with early-stage dementia identified engaging in meaningful activity (e.g., work, family functions) and not being a burden on family near the end of life as important goals. Participants articulated the need to readdress goals as the disease progressed and reported challenges in goal-setting when goals differed between the person with dementia and the caregiver (e.g., patient safety vs. living independently at home). While goals were similar among English- and Spanish-speaking participants, Spanish-speaking participants emphasized the need to improve community education about dementia.
Conclusions
Patient- and caregiver-identified goals for care are different than commonly measured health outcomes for dementia. Future work should incorporate patient-centered goals into clinical settings and assess their usefulness for dementia care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cummings, J. L. (1997). The neuropsychiatric inventory: Assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology, 48, S10–S16.
Thornton, M., & Travis, S. S. (2003). Analysis of the reliability of the modified caregiver strain index. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, S127–S132.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.
Case, S. M., O’Leary, J., Kim, N., et al. (2015). Older adults’ recognition of trade-offs in healthcare decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63, 1658–1662.
Bogardus, S. T., Jr., Bradley, E. H., & Tinetti, M. E. (1998). A taxonomy for goal setting in the care of persons with dementia. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 675–680.
Bradley, E. H., Bogardus, S. T., Jr., van Doorn, C., et al. (2000). Goals in geriatric assessment: Are we measuring the right outcomes? The Gerontologist, 40, 191–196.
Ducharme, J. K., & Geldmacher, D. S. (2011). Family quality of life in dementia: A qualitative approach to family-identified care priorities. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 20, 1331–1335.
Macrae, H. (2010). Managing identity while living with Alzheimer’s disease. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 293–305.
Phinney, A., Chaudhury, H., & O’Connor, D. L. (2007). Doing as much as I can do: The meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 11, 384–393.
Riedel, B. C., Ducharme, J. K., & Geldmacher, D. S. (2013). Family composition and expressions of family-focused care needs at an academic memory disorders clinic. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2013, 436271.
Kuluski, K., Gill, A., Naganathan, G., et al. (2013). A qualitative descriptive study on the alignment of care goals between older persons with multi-morbidities, their family physicians and informal caregivers. BMC Family Practice, 14, 133.
Reamy, A. M., Kim, K., Zarit, S. H., et al. (2011). Understanding discrepancy in perceptions of values: Individuals with mild to moderate dementia and their family caregivers. The Gerontologist, 51, 473–483.
Bogardus, S. T., Jr., Bradley, E. H., Williams, C. S., et al. (2004). Achieving goals in geriatric assessment: Role of caregiver agreement and adherence to recommendations. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 99–105.
Rockwood, K., Fay, S., Song, X., et al. (2006). Attainment of treatment goals by people with Alzheimer’s disease receiving galantamine: A randomized controlled trial. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174, 1099–1105.
Rockwood, K., Howlett, S., Stadnyk, K., et al. (2003). Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 736–743.
Turner-Stokes, L. (2009). Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 362–370.
Vu, M., & Law, A. V. (2012). Goal-attainment scaling: A review and applications to pharmacy practice. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy: RSAP, 8, 102–121.
Fried, T. R., Tinetti, M., Agostini, J., et al. (2011). Health outcome prioritization to elicit preferences of older persons with multiple health conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 83, 278–282.
Reuben, D. B., & Tinetti, M. E. (2012). Goal-oriented patient care—an alternative health outcomes paradigm. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 777–779.
Reuben, D. B., Evertson, L. C., Wenger, N. S., et al. (2013). The University of California at Los Angeles Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care Program for comprehensive, coordinated, catient-centered care: Preliminary data. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61, 2214–2218.
Tan, Z. S., Jennings, L., & Reuben, D. (2014). Coordinated care management for dementia in a large academic health system. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 33, 619–625.
Case, S. M., Towle, V. R., & Fried, T. R. (2013). Considering the balance: Development of a scale to assess patient views on trade-offs in competing health outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61, 1331–1336.
Coylewright, M., Palmer, R., & O’Neill, E. S., et al. (2016). Patient-defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A qualitative analysis. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 19, 1036–1043.
Fried, T. R., Bradley, E. H., Towle, V. R., et al. (2002). Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1061–1066.
Lum, H. D., Brown, J. B., Juarez-Colunga, E., et al. (2015). Physician involvement in life transition planning: A survey of community-dwelling older adults. BMC Family Practice, 16, 92.
Rosenfeld, K. E., Wenger, N. S., & Kagawa-Singer, M. (2000). End-of-life decision making: A qualitative study of elderly individuals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 620–625.
Teh, C. F., Karp, J. F., Kleinman, A., et al. (2009). Older people’s experiences of patient-centered treatment for chronic pain: A qualitative study. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass), 10, 521–530.
Tinetti, M. E., McAvay, G. J., Fried, T. R., et al. (2008). Health outcome priorities among competing cardiovascular, fall injury, and medication-related symptom outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1409–1416.
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 320, 50–52.
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 320, 114–116.
Bayliss, E. A., Bonds, D. E., Boyd, C. M., et al. (2014). Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: Moving from what is the matter to what matters. Annals of Family Medicine, 12, 260–269.
Naik, A. D., Martin, L. A., Moye, J., et al. (2016). Health values and treatment goals of older, multimorbid adults facing life-threatening illness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64, 625–631.
Working Group on Health Outcomes for Older Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions. (2012). Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60, 2333–2341.
Case, S. M., O’Leary, J., Kim, N., et al. (2014). Relationship between universal health outcome priorities and willingness to take medication for primary prevention of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 1753–1758.
Fried, T. R., McGraw, S., Agostini, J. V., et al. (2008). Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1839–1844.
Boyd, C. M., & Kent, D. M. (2014). Evidence-based medicine and the hard problem of multimorbidity. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29, 552–553.
Boyd, C. M., Wolff, J. L., Giovannetti, E., et al. (2014). Healthcare task difficulty among older adults with multimorbidity. Medical Care, 52(Suppl 3), S118–S125.
Tinetti, M. E., & Basu, J. (2014). Research on multiple chronic conditions: Where we are and where we need to go. Medical Care, 52(Suppl 3), S3–S6.
Tinetti, M. E., Bogardus, S. T., & Agostini, J. V. (2004). Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 2870–2874.
Tinetti, M. E., McAvay, G. J., Chang, S. S., et al. (2011). Contribution of multiple chronic conditions to universal health outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 1686–1691.
Acknowledgements
We thank Leslie Evertson, GNP, Michelle Panlilio, NP, Jeanine Moreno, GNP, Mihae Kim, NP, and Claudia Wong, NP, Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, and Nadia S. Cantuña, J.D., Qualified Dementia Care Specialist, for their assistance with recruitment. We thank the Patient and Caregiver Goals Study Oversight Committee for their review of the goal inventory for dementia care.
Authors’ contribution
LAJ was involved in conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; drafted the article; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. AP and MGC were involved in analysis and interpretation of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. XEC was involved in conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. KDR was involved in acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. TZ was involved in acquisition of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. RDH was involved in conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval. NSW and DBR were involved in conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; revised the article critically for important intellectual content; involved in final approval.
Funding
This project was supported by a grant from the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) (ME-1303-5845). Dr. Jennings was supported by the UCLA Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) (5P30AG028748)33 and the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR000124. Dr. Hays was supported in part by grants from the NIA (P30-AG021684) and the NIMHD (P20-MD000182). The funders had no role in the in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Human and animal rights
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the UCLA institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jennings, L.A., Palimaru, A., Corona, M.G. et al. Patient and caregiver goals for dementia care. Qual Life Res 26, 685–693 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1471-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1471-7