Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures
Research studies that measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in both children and adults and longitudinal studies that follow children into adulthood need measures that can be compared across these age groups. This study links the PROMIS pediatric and adult emotional distress measures using data from participants with diverse health conditions and disabilities.
Analyses were conducted and compared in two separate samples to confirm the stability of results. One sample (n = 874) included individuals aged 14–20 years with special health care needs and who require health services. The other sample (n = 641) included individuals aged 14–25 years who have a physical or cognitive disability. Participants completed both PROMIS pediatric and adult measures. Item response theory-based scores were linked using the linear approximation to calibrated projection.
The estimated latent-variable correlation between pediatric and adult PROMIS measures ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Regression coefficients β0 (intercept) and β1 (slope), and mean squared error are provided to transform scores from the pediatric to the adult measures, and vice versa.
This study used a relatively new linking method, calibrated projection, to link PROMIS pediatric and adult measure scores, thus expanding the use of PROMIS measures to research that includes both populations.
KeywordsPROMIS Pediatrics Patient-reported outcomes Item response theory Linkage Emotional distress
- 1.DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12–S21. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e200005650-200705001-00003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 3. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Lai, J. S., Tian, F., Coster, W. J., Jette, A. M., et al. (2011). Linking the activity measure for post acute care and the quality of life outcomes in neurological disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S37–S43. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tian, F., Ni, P., Mulcahey, M. J., Hambleton, R. K., Tulsky, D., Haley, S. M., & Jette, A. M. (2014). Tracking functional status across the spinal cord injury lifespan: Linking pediatric and adult patient-reported outcome scores. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(11), 2078 e2015–2085 e2015. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 14.Wahl, I., Lowe, B., Bjorner, J. B., Fischer, F., Langs, G., Voderholzer, U., et al. (2014). Standardization of depression measurement: A common metric was developed for 11 self-report depression measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(1), 73–86. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Thissen, D., Liu, Y., Magnus, B., & Quinn, H. (2015). Extending the use of multidimensional IRT calibration as projection: Many-to-one linking and linear computation of projected scores. In L. A. van der Ark, D. M. Bolt, W-C. Wang, J. A. Douglas & S-M. Chow (Eds.), Quantitative Psychology Research: The 79th annual meeting of the psychometric society, Madison, Wisconsin, 2014 (pp. 1–16). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
- 19.Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283. doi:10.1177/1073191111411667.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Neff, J. M., Sharp, V. L., Muldoon, J., Graham, J., Popalisky, J., & Gay, J. C. (2002). Identifying and classifying children with chronic conditions using administrative data with the clinical risk group classification system. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2(1), 71–79. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0071:iaccwc>2.0.co;2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bethell, C. D., Read, D., Stein, R. E., Blumberg, S. J., Wells, N., & Newacheck, P. W. (2002). Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2(1), 38–48. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0038:icwshc>2.0.co;2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO for windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- 30.Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement. No. 17 (pp. 1–98). Richamond, VA: Psychometric Society. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/jounal/online/MN17.pdf.
- 31.Thissen, D., Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Liu, Y., Irwin, D. E., & Dewalt, D. A. (2011). Using the PedsQL 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Quality of Life Research, 20(9), 1497–1505. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9874-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar