Quality of Life Research

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 823–833

Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures

  • Bryce B. Reeve
  • David Thissen
  • Darren A. DeWalt
  • I-Chan Huang
  • Yang Liu
  • Brooke Magnus
  • Hally Quinn
  • Heather E. Gross
  • Pamela A. Kisala
  • Pengsheng Ni
  • Stephen Haley
  • M. J. Mulcahey
  • Susie Charlifue
  • Robin A. Hanks
  • Mary Slavin
  • Alan Jette
  • David S. Tulsky
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Research studies that measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in both children and adults and longitudinal studies that follow children into adulthood need measures that can be compared across these age groups. This study links the PROMIS pediatric and adult emotional distress measures using data from participants with diverse health conditions and disabilities.

Methods

Analyses were conducted and compared in two separate samples to confirm the stability of results. One sample (n = 874) included individuals aged 14–20 years with special health care needs and who require health services. The other sample (n = 641) included individuals aged 14–25 years who have a physical or cognitive disability. Participants completed both PROMIS pediatric and adult measures. Item response theory-based scores were linked using the linear approximation to calibrated projection.

Results

The estimated latent-variable correlation between pediatric and adult PROMIS measures ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Regression coefficients β0 (intercept) and β1 (slope), and mean squared error are provided to transform scores from the pediatric to the adult measures, and vice versa.

Conclusions

This study used a relatively new linking method, calibrated projection, to link PROMIS pediatric and adult measure scores, thus expanding the use of PROMIS measures to research that includes both populations.

Keywords

PROMIS Pediatrics Patient-reported outcomes Item response theory Linkage Emotional distress 

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryce B. Reeve
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Thissen
    • 3
  • Darren A. DeWalt
    • 4
  • I-Chan Huang
    • 5
    • 6
  • Yang Liu
    • 7
  • Brooke Magnus
    • 3
  • Hally Quinn
    • 3
  • Heather E. Gross
    • 2
  • Pamela A. Kisala
    • 8
  • Pengsheng Ni
    • 9
  • Stephen Haley
    • 9
  • M. J. Mulcahey
    • 10
  • Susie Charlifue
    • 11
  • Robin A. Hanks
    • 12
  • Mary Slavin
    • 9
  • Alan Jette
    • 9
  • David S. Tulsky
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  6. 6.Department of Epidemiology and Cancer ControlSt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  7. 7.School of Social SciencesHumanities, and Arts University of CaliforniaMercedUSA
  8. 8.Center for Assessment Research and Translation, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  9. 9.Health and Disability Research InstituteBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  10. 10.Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health ProfessionsThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  11. 11.Craig HospitalEnglewoodUSA
  12. 12.Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations