Abstract
Purpose
To examine the validity of using the same scoring coefficients across countries for the SF-12.
Methods
We test the equality of scoring coefficients derived for a contraction of the SF-36, the Short Form 12 (SF-12), using a large international database drawn from nine countries, to test equality between Australia and twelve other country/language groups. First, we checked that the theoretical structure of the SF-12 as set out by Ware and colleagues, but including a correlation between physical and mental health, provided an adequate fit to the data for each country/language group in a confirmatory factor analysis. We then compared Australia to all of these country/language groups in multiple-group models to assess whether a model producing common factor score coefficients provided an adequate fit to the data. We also derived Chi-squared tests for the differences between the restricted and unrestricted models, to test the equality of the factor score coefficients across countries.
Results
We found that the theoretical structure of the SF-12, with a correlation between physical and mental health, provides an adequate fit to the data for all country/language groups except Hungary. Further, all the unrestricted multiple-group models provide an adequate fit to the data. In contrast, none of the multiple-group models restricted to common parameters provide an adequate fit to the data. The significance tests confirm that the constraints on parameter values produce significantly different models to the unrestricted models.
Conclusions
We conclude that researchers should derive their own country-specific scoring coefficients for physical and mental health summary scores.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson, D., Parsons, J., & Tucker, G. (2000). The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions. Sozial-und Präventivmedizin, 45, 239–246.
Wilson, D., Tucker, G., & Chittleborough, C. (2002). Rethinking and rescoring the SF-12. Sozial-und Präventivmedizin, 47, 172–177.
Tucker, G., Adams, R., & Wilson, D. (2010). New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 & SF-12 health status questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1069–1076.
Tucker, G. R., Adams, R. J., Wilson D.H. (2013) Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 Version 2—An alternative scoring method can correct the problem. PLoS ONE. 8(4): e61191.
Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R. H., Taylor, A., et al. (2007). The SF-36 Version 2: Critical analyses of weights, scoring algorithms and population norms. Quality of Life Research, 16(661), 73.
Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., et al. (1998). SF-36 summary scores. Are physical and mental health truly distinct. Medical Care, 36, 567–572.
Farrivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 health survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 54.
Hann, M., & Reeves, D. (2008). The SF-36 summary scales are not accurately summarized by independent physical and mental component scores. Quality of Life Research, 17, 413–423.
Agnastopoulos, F., Niakis, D., & Tountas, Y. (2009). Comparison between exploratory factor analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores. Quality of Life Research, 18, 53–63.
Fleishman, J. A., Selim, A. J., & Kasiz, L. E. (2010). Deriving SF-12 v2 physical and mental health summary scores: A comparison of different scoring algorithms. Quality of Life Research, 19(2), 231–241.
Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary scores accurately summarise subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404.
Ware, J., & Kosinski, M. (2001). Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: A response. Quality of Life Research, 10, 405–413.
Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Reply to Drs Ware and Kosinski. Quality of Life Research, 10, 415–420.
Ware, J. E, Jr, Gandek, B., Kosinski, M., et al. (1998). The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1167–1170.
Stats Canada. (2011). The Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey, 2003 and 2008 Public Use Microdata File User’s Manual.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. (2006). Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey: User Guide, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4228.0.55.002.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1995). National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4399.0.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (2nd ed.). Boston: The Health Institute, New England MedicalCenter.
Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625–641.
Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 548–570.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
Joreskog, K. G. (2000). Latent variable scores and their uses. ILScientific Software International: Lincolnwood.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and Practice of Scaled Difference Chi Square Testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 372–398.
Guilleman, E., Bombardier, L., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(13), 1417–1432.
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). Equivalence and the translation and adaptation of health related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6(3), 4–237.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, L., Guilleman, F., et al. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3816–3891.
Sanson-Fisher, R. W., & Perkins, J. J. (1998). Adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Australia. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 961–967.
Liu, C. J., Li, N. X., Ren, X. H., & Liu, D. P. (2010). Is traditional rural lifestyle a barrier for quality of life assessment? A case study using the Short Form 36 in a rural Chinese population. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 31–36.
Life Expectancy Trends-Australia. Australian Social Trends, March (2011). Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue 4102.0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests and funding
This work was unfunded. The authors are unaware of any possible conflict of interest in the production of this publication.
Ethical standard
This paper is based on a secondary analysis of various International and Australian survey files. As such, this analysis did not require formal ethics approval; however, all of the original data collections were conducted under ethics approval with the informed consent of the participants.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tucker, G., Adams, R. & Wilson, D. The case for using country-specific scoring coefficients for scoring the SF-12, with scoring implications for the SF-36. Qual Life Res 25, 267–274 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1083-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1083-7