Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Malay version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the validity and reliability of the Malay version of the Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia.

Methods

The QUALEFFO-41 was translated from English to Malay and administered to 215 post-menopausal osteoporotic women ≥50 years who could understand Malay, at baseline and 4 weeks. The SF-36 was administered at baseline to assess convergent validity. To assess discriminative validity, patients with and without back pain were recruited.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the QUALEFFO-41 had five domains. Good internal consistency was seen in all domains (0.752–0.925) except for the social activity domain (0.692). Test–retest reliability showed adequate correlation for all items (0.752–0.964, p < 0.001). Patients with back pain had significantly worse QOL compared with those without (back pain = 42.2 ± 10.9, no back pain = 33.3 ± 8.9; p < 0.001). The total QUALEFFO-41 score and the SF-36 physical and mental composite scores were significantly correlated (−0.636 and −0.529, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The Malay version of the QUALEFFO-41 was found to be a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the QOL of osteoporotic patients in Malaysia. To enable the QUALEFFO-41 to be used in a multiracial population, further studies should look into validating other versions of the QUALEFFO-41 in Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Gold, D. T. (2001). The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, 27(1), 255–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. International Osteoporosis Foundation. (2014). Facts and statistics. Retrieved August 11, 2014 from http://www.iofbonehealth.org/print/11862

  3. Autier, P., Haentjens, P., Bentin, J., Baillon, J. M., Grivegnee, A. R., Closon, M. C., & Boonen, S. (2000). Costs induced by hip fractures: A prospective controlled study in Belgium. Belgian hip fracture study group. Osteoporosis International, 11(5), 373–380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leibson, C. L., Tosteson, A. N., Gabriel, S. E., Ransom, J. E., & Melton, L. J. (2002). Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: A population-based study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(10), 1644–1650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adachi, J.D., Ioannidis, G., Olszynski, W.P., Brown, J.P., Hanley, D.A., Sebaldt, R.J., Petrie, A., Tenenhouse, A., Stephenson, G.F., Papaioannou, A., Guyatt, G.H., & Goldsmith, C.H. (2002). The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 3(11).

  6. Silverman, S. L. (2000). The Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ): A reliable and valid disease-targeted measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporosis. Quality of Life Research, 9(1), 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helmes, E., Hodsman, A., Lazowski, D., Bhardwaj, A., Crilly, R., Nichol, P., et al. (1995). A questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50A(2), M91–M98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guyatt, G. H., & Cook, D. J. (1997). Osteoporosis quality of life study group: Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 7(5), 478–487.

  9. Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., Adachi, J. D., Epstein, R. S., Juniper, E. F., Austin, P. A., et al. (1999). Development and validation of the mini-osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Osteoporosis International, 10(3), 207–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marquis, P., Cialdella, P., & De la Loge, C. (2001). Development and validation of a specific quality of life module in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: The QUALIOST. Quality of Life Research, 10(6), 555–566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumamoto, K., Nakamura, T., Suzuki, T., Gorai, I., Fujinawa, O., Ohta, H., et al. (2010). Validation of the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 28(1), 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lips, P., & Leplege, A. (2000). Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with vertebral fractures: Qualeffo-41. Quality of Life Research, 9(1), 763–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai, P. S. M., Chua, S. S., Chan, S. P., & Low, W. Y. (2008). Validation of the English version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) in Malaysia. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 11(4), 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khuong, M. N., & Yen, N. H. (2014). The effects of leadership styles and sociability trait emotional intelligence on employee engagement. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 2(1), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, J. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2011). A confirmatory factor analysis study on the medical student stressor questionnaire among Malaysian medical students. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 3(1), e44–e53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16, 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Vellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, C.W., & Qu, Y. (2010). Alternate Forms Test-Retest Reliability and Test Score Changes for the TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests. Paper presented at the TOEIC Compendium.

  21. de Oliveira Ferreira, N., Arthuso, M., da Silva, R. B., Pinto-Neto, A. M., & Costa-Paiva, L. (2013). Validation of the Portuguese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Brazilian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis with vertebral fracture. Clinical Rheumatology, 32, 1585–1592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rostom, S., Allali, F., Bahiri, R., Abouqal, R., & Hajjaj-Hassouni, N. (2011). Psychometric properties evaluation of the quality of life Questionnaire of the European foundation for Osteoporosis in Arabic population. Rheumatology International, 32(7), 2037–2049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pérez, E. R., Clark, P., Wacher, N. H., Cardiel, M. H., & García, M. D. (2008). Cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) in a Mexican population. Clinical Rheumatology, 27, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank: the staff at the osteoporosis and primary care clinics and radiology for their assistance in referring participants, and all participants of this study. This project was funded by the Postgraduate Research Fund P0057-2012B, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Conflict of interest

Thiagarajan Nagammai, Mohamed Mohazmi, Su-May Liew, Karuthan Chinna and Pauline Siew Mei Lai declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline Siew Mei Lai.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagammai, T., Mohazmi, M., Liew, S.M. et al. Validation of the Malay version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia. Qual Life Res 24, 2031–2037 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0933-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0933-7

Keywords

Navigation