Skip to main content
Log in

Mixture modelling analysis of one-month disability after stroke: stroke outcomes study (SOS1)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the heterogeneity in disability after stroke is important to guide treatment and rehabilitation planning. We explored mixture modelling analysis to identify subgroups of stroke disability and factors associated with disability subgroups.

Method

Analyses were performed using secondary data from a cohort of 448 stroke patients who participated in a 2-year study of stroke outcomes. Mixture modelling approach was used to determine subgroups of early disability following stroke based on the Barthel Index, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Frenchay Activities Index and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale.

Results

Five distinct disability groups were identified. Nineteen (4.2 %) patients were classified as having very severe disability, 58 (12.9 %) severe disability, 133 (29.7 %) moderate disability, 198 (44.2 %) mild disability and 40 (8.9 %) a mood disorder. Compared to the mild group, patients in the “very severe” group were more likely to be elderly and to have had a previous stroke, and less likely to live alone and had a greater risk of mortality 2 years after stroke. Patients in the mood disorder group showed greater dependency in activities of daily living were younger compared to the other groups and had a greater risk of having mood symptoms 2 years after stroke.

Conclusion

Mixture modelling of 1-month disability after stroke using a broad range of outcome measures has identified clinically meaningful groups relating to long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SOS:

Stroke outcomes study

BI:

Barthel Index

GHQ:

General Health Questionnaire

PSE:

Post-stroke examination

NEADL:

Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living

ADL:

Activities of daily living

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

LPA:

Latent profile analysis

FAI:

Frenchay Activities Index

BIC:

Bayesian information criteria

LMR:

Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test

References

  1. Kent, T. A., Soukup, V. M., & Fabian, R. H. (2001). Heterogeneity affecting outcome from acute stroke therapy: Making reperfusion worse. Stroke, 32(10), 2318–2327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Statistics report: http://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/Stroke%20statistics.pdf. Accessed on 9 October 2013.

  3. World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease (Geneva, 1980).

  4. Kelly-Hayes, M., Robertson, T. J., Broderick, J. P., Duncan, W. P., Hershey, A. L., Roth, J. E., et al. (1998). The American heart association stroke outcome classification: Executive summary. Circulation, 97(24), 2474–2478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brott, T., Adams, H. P, Jr, Olinger, C. P., Marler, J. R., Barsan, W. G., Biller, J., et al. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke, 20(7), 864–870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rankin, J. (1957). Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scottish Medical Journal, 2(5), 200–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahoney, F., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166–170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McLachlan, G. J. (1992). Cluster analysis and related techniques in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1(1), 27–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mulroy, S., Gronley, J., Weiss, W., Newsam, C., & Perry, J. (2003). Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patients in the early and late recovery phases following stroke. Gait Posture, 18(1), 114–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Pickles, A., & Croudace, T. (2010). Latent mixture models for multivariate and longitudinal outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 19(3), 271–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. West, R. M., Hill, M. K., Hewison, J., Knapp, P., & House, A. (2010). Psychological disorders after stroke are an important influence on functional outcomes. A prospective cohort study. Stroke, 41(8), 1723–1727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirbagheri, M. M., & Rymer, W. Z. (2009). Prediction of Reflex recovery after stroke using quantitative Assessments of motor impairment at 1 month. In: Conference proceedings of IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc pp. 7252–7255.

  20. Mayo, N. E., Bronstein, D., Scott, S. C., Finch, L. E., & Miller, S. (2014). Necessary and sufficient causes of participation post-stroke: Practical and philosophical perspectives. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 39–47.

  21. House, A., Knapp, P., Bamford, J., & Vail, A. (2001). Mortality at 12 and 24 months after stroke may be associated with depressive symptoms at 1 month. Stroke, 32(3), 696–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldberg, D. P., & Hiller, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire 1992. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Enders, C. K. (2005). Estimation by maximum likelihood. In B. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral statistics (pp. 1164–1170). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mutheń, L., & Mutheń, B. (2005). MPlus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lo, Y., Mendall, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marsh, H. W., Ludke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centred approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

  30. Wing, J., Cooper, J., & Sartorius, N. (1974). The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Toschke, A. M., Tilling, K., Cox, A. M., Rudd, A. G., Heuschmann, P. U., & Wolfe, C. D. E. (2010). Patient-specific recovery patterns over time measured by dependence in activities of daily living after stroke and post-stroke care: The South London Stroke Register (SLSR). European Journal of Neurology, 17(2), 219–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tilling, K., Sterne, J. A., & Wolfe, C. D. (2001). Multilevel growth curve models with covariate effects: Application to recovery after stroke. Statistics in Medicine, 20(5), 685–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bagg, S., Pombo, A. P., & Hopman, W. (2002). Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 33, 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maree, L., Hackett, M. A., Yapa, C., Parag, V., & Anderson, C. S. (2005). Frequency of depression after stroke a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke, 36, 1330–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bergersen, H., Schanke, A. K., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2013). Predictors of emotional distress and well of emotional distress and well being 2–5 years after stroke. Volume 2013, Hidawi Publishing Corporation. ISRN stroke.

  36. Wade, D. T., Legh-Smith, J., & Hewer, R. A. (1987). Depressed mood after stroke. A community study of its frequency. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 200.

  37. Brown, C., Hasson, H., Thyselius, V., & Almborg, A. H. (2012). Post-stroke depression and functional independence: A conundrum. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 126(1), 45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. White, J. H., Magin, P., Attia, J., Pollack, M. R., Sturm, J., & Levi, C. R. (2008). Exploring post stroke mood changes in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A qualitative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(9), 1701–1707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Daniel, K., Wolfe, C. D., Busch, M. A., & McKevitt, C. (2009). What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke, 40(6), e431–e440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Duncan, W. P., Jorgensen, H. S., & Wade, D. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31(6), 1420–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hackett, M. I., Anderson, C. S., House, A., & Halten, C. (2008). Interventions for preventing depression after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 16(3). doi:10.1002/14651858.

  42. Williams, L. S., Kroenkek, K., Bakas, T., Plue, L. D., et al. (2007). Care management of: Post stroke depression: A randomised controlled trial. Stroke, 38, 998–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Watkins, C. I., Auston, M. F., Deans, C. F., Dickinson, H. A., Jack, C. I., et al. (2007). Motivational interviewing early after stroke, a randomised controlled trial. Stroke, 38, 1004–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa Munyombwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munyombwe, T., Hill, K.M., Knapp, P. et al. Mixture modelling analysis of one-month disability after stroke: stroke outcomes study (SOS1). Qual Life Res 23, 2267–2275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0681-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0681-0

Keywords

Navigation