Physical activity and quality of life among university students: exploring self-efficacy, self-esteem, and affect as potential mediators
- 5k Downloads
Physical activity (PA) has been shown to enhance quality of life (QOL) in older adults. Findings from these studies indicate that the relationship between PA and QOL is indirect and likely mediated by variables such as physical self-esteem, exercise self-efficacy, and affect. As PA varies greatly by age, the purpose of the current study is to extend this area of research to young adults and explore the complex relationship between PA and QOL in this target population.
Data were collected via anonymous questionnaire from N = 590 undergraduate students. PA was assessed with the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, and QOL was assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Path analysis was used to test the relationship between PA and QOL, with mediators of exercise self-efficacy, physical self-esteem, and affect.
The PA model (RMSEA = .03, CFI = .99) accounted for 25 % of the variance in QOL. PA had positive direct effects on exercise self-efficacy (β = .28, P < .001), physical self-esteem (β = .10, P < .001), positive affect (β = .10, P < .05), and negative affect (β = .08, P < .05). Physical self-esteem was found to be the most powerful mediating variable on QOL (β = .30, P < .001), followed by positive affect (β = .27, P < .001) and negative affect (β = .14, P < .001).
Physical self-esteem and, to a lesser extent, positive affect emerged as integral components in the link between PA and QOL. Findings suggest that health education programs designed to promote regular PA and increase physical self-esteem may be effective in improving QOL in young adults.
KeywordsPhysical activity Quality of life Life satisfaction Young adults College Affect Self-esteem
- 1.World Health Organization. (2012). Physical activity. http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Physical activity and health. http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/health/index.html.
- 3.World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Group. (1998). Development and psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 17.Google Scholar
- 11.Motl, R. W., McAuley, E., Snook, E. M., & Gliottoni, R. C. (2009). Physical activity and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Intermediary roles of disability, fatigue, mood, pain, self-efficacy and social support. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 14(1), 111–124.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Maher, J. P., Doerksen, S. E., Elavsky, S., Hyde, A. L., Pincus, A. L., Ram, N., et al. (2012). A daily analysis of physical activity and satisfaction with life in emerging adults. Health Psychology, 16(2), 265–271.Google Scholar
- 19.Arria, A. M., Caldeira, K. M., O’Grady, K. E., Vincent, K. B., Fitzelle, D. B., Johnson, E. P., et al. (2008). Drug exposure opportunities and use patterns among college students: Results of a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Substance Abuse, 29(4), 19–38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Godin, G., & Shepard, R. J. (1985). The Godin leisure time exercise questionnaire; Cited by Kriska A. M., Caspersen C. J. A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Supplement for Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, 29, 3.Google Scholar
- 28.Miller, D. J., Freedson, P. S., & Kline, G. M. (1994). Comparison of activity levels using Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, 26, 376–382.Google Scholar
- 32.Fox, K. R. (1990). The physical self-perception profile manual. DeKalb, IL: Office for Health Promotion, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- 34.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman: New York.Google Scholar
- 36.Bradburn, N. M. (1969). Structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- 40.SAS Institute Inc. (2010). SAS version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- 41.SAS Institute Inc. (2010). PROC CALIS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- 49.Jacob, T., Itzchak, E. B., & Raz, O. (2012). Stress among healthcare students: a cross disciplinary perspective. Physiotherapy, Theory, and Practice. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.009.
- 50.Reeve, K. L., Shumaker, C. J., Yearwood, E. L., Crowell, N. A., & Riley, J. B. (2012). Perceived stress and social support in undergraduate nursing students’ educational experiences. Nursing Education Today. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.009.
- 52.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health. (2011). CDC HRQOL-14 “Healthy Days Measure.” http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/hrqol14_measure.htm.
- 53.World Health Organization. (2004). World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)—Bref. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/en/english_whoqol.pdf.
- 54.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health. (2011). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/data/tables/table4a.htm.