Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A review of patient-reported outcomes for children and adolescents with obesity

  • Review
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Obesity is a chronic condition that can impact the physical, emotional, mental and social elements that encompass a child’s life. The objectives of this study were to identify which generic and obesity-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are used in obesity literature, as well as review their conceptual approach, health and health-related content, ethical content and psychometric properties.

Method

PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched from the inception of each database to May 2012 to identify all studies using multi-dimensional PRO instruments with children who are overweight or obese. The most common generic and all obesity-specific instruments were analyzed according to the study objectives.

Results

From 4,226 articles identified by our search, 70 articles used 6 generic and 4 obesity-specific PRO instruments. While the most commonly used PRO instrument was the generic PedsQL 4.0 (used in 53 studies), many health domains were found in the obesity-specific instruments that are not measured by the PedsQL 4.0. Summary of the development and psychometric properties of the generic and obesity PROs identified that no one instrument meets all the guideline criteria for instrument development and validation, e.g., only one instrument included qualitative input from children with obesity in the content development phase.

Discussion

This comprehensive review provides information to aid in selecting multi-dimensional PRO instruments in children with obesity according to various aspects of content as well as psychometric properties. The conceptual analysis shows that the reviewed PRO instruments contain inconsistencies in their conceptual approaches. Also, certain relevant health domains to children and youth with obesity were not included in the most commonly used generic instrument. The obesity-specific instruments require further validation before they can be used in intervention studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHQ:

Child Health Questionnaire

FDH:

Functioning disability and health

HRQOL:

Health-related quality of life

HUI:

Health Utilities Index

KINDL:

KINDL (registered) Quality of Life Questionnaire

ICF-CY:

International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Children and Youth Version

IWQOL-Kids:

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Kids

PEDSQL:

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory

PRO:

Patient-reported outcome

QOL:

Quality of life

WHO:

World Health Organization

YQOL-S:

Youth Quality of Life-Surveillance Version

YQOL-W:

Youth Quality of Life-Weight

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2013). Childhood overweight and obesity. Resource Document. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/. Accessed on January 2 2013.

  2. Fayed, N., Schiariti, V., Bostan, C., Cieza, A., & Klassen, A. (2011). Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: Deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1247–1258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fayed, N., De Camargo, O. K., Kerr, E., Rosenbaum, P., et al. (2012). Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: A review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54(12), 1085–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams, J., Wake, M., Hesketh, K., Maher, E., & Waters, E. (2005). Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(1), 70–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL user manual. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fayed, N., & Kerr, E. N. (2009). Comparing quality of life scales in childhood epilepsy: What’s in the measures? International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, 8(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schiariti, V., Fayed, N., Cieza, A., Klassen, A., et al. (2011). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures for cerebral palsy based on the international classification of functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(15–16), 1330–1339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Resource Document. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidancecomplianceRegulatoryinformation/guidelines/UCM193282.pdf www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidancecomplianceRegulatoryinformation/guidelines/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed on January 2, 2013.

  9. Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10–11), 1427–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ronen, G. M., Fayed, N., & Rosenbaum, P. L. (2011). Outcomes in pediatric neurology: A review of conceptual issues and recommendations The 2010 Ronnie Mac Keith lecture. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(4), 305–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, E. (2006). Paediatric quality of life instruments: A review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(04), 311–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Civita, M. (2005). Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: Some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications. PharmacoEconomics, 23(7), 659–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Wetzel, R., Nickel, J., & Bullinger, M. (2006). Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: Methodological considerations. PharmacoEconomics, 24(12), 1199–1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke, S., & Eiser, C. (2004). The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 66.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84(3), 205–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harding, L. (2001). Children’s quality of life assessments: A review of generic and health related quality of life measures completed by children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 8(2), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matza, L. S., Swenson, A. R., Flood, E. M., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in health, 7(1), 79–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solans, M., Pane, S., Estrada, M. D., Serra-Sutton, V., Berra, S., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in health, 11(4), 742–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Fernandez de Sanmamed, M. J., Detmar, S., Bruil, J., Ravens-Sieberer, U., et al. (2004). Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: A qualitative analysis of content. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(1), 37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Giraudeau, B., & Mary, J. Y. (2001). Planning a reproducibility study: How many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Statistics in Medicine, 20(21), 3205–3214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Varni, J. W., Katz, E. R., Seid, M., Quiggins, D. J. L., & Friedman-Bender, A. (1998). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory-32 (PCQL-32): I. Reliability and validity. Cancer, 82(6), 1184–1196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Varni, J. W., Katz, E. R., Seid, M., Quiggins, D. J. L., Friedman-Bender, A., et al. (1998). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory (PCQL): I. Instrument development, descriptive statistics, and cross-informant variance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(2), 179–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Varni, J. W., Rode, C. A., Seid, M., Katz, E. R., Friedman-Bender, A., & Quiggins, D. J. L. (1999). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory-32 (PCQL-32): II. Feasibility and range of measurement. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 397–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varni, J. W. (2013). The PedsQL measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. http://www.PedsQL.org/. Accessed on May 3, 2013.

  27. Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2001). PedsQL 4.0: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39(8), 800–812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Seid, M., & Skarr, D. (2003). The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 3(6), 329–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolotkin, R. L., Head, S., & Brookhart, A. (1997). Construct validity of the impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire. Obesity Research, 5(5), 434–441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolotkin, R. L., Head, S., Hamilton, M., & Tse, C. K. (1995). Assessing impact of weight on quality of life. Obesity Research, 3(1), 49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolotkin, R. L., & Crosby, R. D. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 157–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R. (2001). Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obesity Research, 9(20), 102–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Modi, A. C., & Zeller, M. H. (2011). The IWQOL-Kids(©): establishing minimal clinically important difference scores and test-retest reliability. International Journal of Paediatric Obesity, 6(2–2), 94–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nadeau, K., Kolotkin, R. L., Boex, R., Witten, T., McFann, K. K., Zeitler, P., et al. (2011). Health-related quality of life in adolescents with comorbidities related to obesity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(1), 90–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeller, M. H., & Modi, A. C. (2009). Development and initial validation of an obesity-specific quality-of-life measure for children: Sizing me up. Obesity, 17(6), 1171–1177.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Modi, A. C., & Zeller, M. H. (2008). Validation of a parent-proxy, obesity-specific quality-of-life measure: Sizing them up. Obesity, 16(12), 2624–2633.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bullinger M. (2000). KINDLER questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents revised version manual.

  38. Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wille, N., Bullinger, M., Holl, R., Hoffmeister, U., Mann, R., Goldapp, C., et al. (2010). Health-related quality of life in overweight and obese youths: Results of a multicenter study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Morales, L. S., Edwards, T. C., Flores, Y., Barr, L., & Patrick, D. L. (2011). Measurement properties of a multicultural weight-specific quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 20(2), 215–224.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Patrick, D.L., Edwards, T.C., Skalicky, A. (2010). Youth quality of life instrument-weight module (YQOL-W). User manual and interpretation guide & scoring programs. (1st Ed.). Seattle, Washington.

  42. WHOQOL Group. (1994). The development of the world health organization quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). In W. Kuyken & J. Orley (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: International perspectives (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Fayed, N. (2011). Content issues in child health status and quality of life instruments: Addressing the challenges with new methods (Doctor of Philosophy, McMaster University). Open Access Dissertations and Theses Paper, 6066.

  44. Colver, A. (2012). Quality of life. In A. Majnemer (Ed.), Measures for children with developmental disability framed by the ICF-CY (1st ed.). Cambridge: Mac Keith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wright, V. et al. (under-review). Parent’s thoughts on the PEDI, Developmental Medicine Child Neurology.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Anne Klassen is a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research career award, and Nora Fayed is a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research postdoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bani Ahuja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahuja, B., Klassen, A.F., Satz, R. et al. A review of patient-reported outcomes for children and adolescents with obesity. Qual Life Res 23, 759–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0459-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0459-9

Keywords

Navigation