Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Explaining quality of life of older people in the Netherlands using a multidimensional assessment of frailty

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although frailty was originally a medical concept, nowadays more and more researchers are convinced of its multidimensional nature, including a psychological and social domain of frailty as well as a physical domain. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the prediction of quality of life by physical frailty components is improved by adding psychological and social frailty components.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of Dutch citizens. A total of 1,031 people aged 65 years and older completed a Web-based questionnaire containing the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for measuring physical, psychological, and social frailty, and the WHOQOL-BREF for measuring four quality of life domains (physical health, psychological, social relations, environmental).

Results

The findings show that the prediction of all quality of life domains by eight physical components of frailty was improved after adding four psychological and three social frailty components. The psychological frailty component ‘feeling down’ significantly improved the prediction of all four quality of life domains, after controlling for the effects of background characteristics and all other frailty components.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of a multidimensional assessment of frailty in the prediction of quality of life in older people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd, C. M., Xue, Q. L., Simpson, C. F., Guralnik, J. M., & Fried, L. P. (2005). Frailty, hospitalization, and progression of disability in a cohort of disabled older women. The American Journal of Medicine, 118(11), 1225–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., et al. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. Journal of Gerontology Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146–M156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravaglia, G., Forti, P., Lucicesare, A., Pisacane, N., Rietti, E., & Patterson, C. (2008). Development of an easy prognostic score for frailty outcomes in the aged. Age and Ageing, 37(2), 161–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, D. M., Song, X., & Rockwood, K. (2004). Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(11), 1929–1933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockwood, K., Song, X., MacKnight, C., et al. (2005). A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(5), 489–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song, X., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2010). Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(4), 681–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, Y. W., Chen, W. L., Lin, F. G., et al. (2012). Frailty and its impact on health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study on elder community-dwelling preventive health service users. PLoS ONE,. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038079.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bilotta, C., Bowling, A., Case, A., et al. (2010). Dimensions and correlates of quality of life according to frailty status: a cross-sectional study on community-dwelling older adults referred to an outpatient geriatric service in Italy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Masel, M. C., Ostir, G. V., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2010). Frailty, mortality, and health-related quality of life in older Mexican Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(11), 2149–2153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levers, M. J., Estabrooks, C. A., & Ross Kerr, J. C. (2006). Factors contributing to frailty: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(3), 282–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Markle-Reid, M., & Browne, G. (2003). Conceptualizations of frailty in relation to older adults. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(1), 58–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gobbens, R. J., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. (2010). Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people. Nursing Outlook, 58(2), 76–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hogan, D. B., MacKnight, C., & Bergman, H. (2003). Models, definitions, and criteria of frailty. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 15(3 Suppl), 1–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gobbens, R. J., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. (2010). Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 14(3), 175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, T. W., Ko, I. S., & Lee, K. J. (2006). Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paskulin, L., Vianna, L., & Molzahn, A. E. (2009). Factors associated with quality of life of Brazilian older adults. International Nursing Review, 56(1), 109–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lubetkin, E. I., Jia, H., Franks, P., & Gold, M. R. (2005). Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2187–2196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raphael, D., Brown, I., Renwick, R., Cava, M., Weir, N., & Heathcote, K. (1997). Measuring the quality of life of older persons: A model with implications for community and public health nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34(3), 231–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilleras, P. K., Jorm, A. F., Herlitz, A., & Winblad, B. (2001). Life satisfaction among the very old: A survey on a cognitively intact sample aged 90 years or above. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52(1), 71–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Netuveli, G., & Blane, D. (2008). Quality of life in older ages. British Medical Bulletin, 85, 113–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunger, M., Thorand, B., Schunk, M., et al. (2011). Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life in the older population: results from the German KORA-age study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rijken, M., van Kerkhof, M., Dekker, J., & Schellevis, F. G. (2005). Comorbidity of chronic diseases: Effects of disease pairs on physical and mental functioning. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 45–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fortin, M., Bravo, G., Hudon, C., et al. (2006). Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Quality of Life Research, 15(1), 83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gobbens, R. J., van Assen, M. A., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. (2010). The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric properties. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 11(5), 344–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gobbens, R. J., van Assen, M. A., Luijkx, K. G., & Schols, J. M. (2012). The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. The Gerontologist, 52(5), 619–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, C. C., Li, C. I., Chang, C. K., et al. (2011). Reduced health-related quality of life in elders with frailty: A cross-sectional study of community-dwelling elders in Taiwan. PLoS ONE,. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021841.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ware, J. E, Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pilotto, A., Rengo, F., Marchionni, N., et al. Comparing the prognostic accuracy for all-cause mortality of frailty instruments: A multicentre 1-year follow-up in hospitalized older patients. PLoS One, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029090.

  30. Andrew, M. K., Mitnitski, A. B., & Rockwood, K. (2008). Social vulnerability, frailty and mortality in elderly people. PLoS ONE,. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Treurniet, H. F., Hoeymans, N., Gijsen, R., Poos, M. J., van Oers, J. A., & Thien, W. M. (2005). Health status and the challenges for prevention in the Netherlands. Public Health, 119(3), 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Central Committee on Research inv. Human Subjects. (2010). Does your study have to be reviewed? http://www.ccmo-online.nl (Home > For investigators > Review step plan RC > WMO) Accessed June 15, 2010.

  33. Metzelthin, S. F., Daniels, R., van Rossum, E., de Witte, L., van den Heuvel, W. J., & Kempen, G. I. (2010). The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health,. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-176.

    Google Scholar 

  34. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalfoss, M. H., Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2008). The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 5(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hawthorne, G., Herrman, H., & Murphy, B. (2006). Interpreting the WHOQOL-BREF: Preliminary population norms and effect sizes. Social Indicators Research, 77, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bowling, A. (2009). The psychometric properties of the older people’s quality of life Questionnaire, compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research,. doi:10.1155/2009/298950.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Puts, M. T., Lips, P., & Deeg, D. J. (2005). Static and dynamic measures of frailty predicted decline in performance-based and self-reported physical functioning. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(11), 1188–1198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bergman, H., Béland, F., Karunananthan, S., Hummel, S., Hogan, D., & Wolfson, C. (2004). English translation of article published in ‘Gerontologie et société’. Dévelopment d’un cadre de travail pour compendre et étudier la fragilité. Gérontologie et société, 109, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fillit, H., & Butler, R. N. (2009). The frailty identity crisis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(2), 348–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ten Doesschate, M. C., Koeter, M. W., Bockting, C. L., & Schene, A. H. (2010). Health related quality of life in recurrent depression: A comparison with a general population sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 120(1–3), 126–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Penninx, B. W., Deeg, D. J., van Eijk, J. T., Beekman, A. T., & Guralnik, J. M. (2000). Changes in depression and physical decline in older adults: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(1–2), 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Puts, M. T., Shekary, N., Widdershoven, G., Heldens, J., Lips, P., & Deeg, D. J. (2007). What does quality of life mean to older frail and non-frail community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands? Quality of Life Research, 16(2), 263–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing & Society, 24(5), 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nicholson, C., Meyer, J., Flatley, M., & Holman, C. (2012). The experience of living at home with frailty in old age: A psychosocial qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies,. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.01.006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bowling, A., Seetai, S., Morris, R., & Ebrahim, S. (2007). Quality of life among older people with poor functioning. The influence of perceived control over life. Age and Ageing, 36(3), 310–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2007). Predictors of quality of life in old age: A cross- validation study. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Holmes, S. (2009). Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(3), 394–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Statline. Bevolking: geslacht, leeftijd en burgerlijke staat, 1 januari. http://www.statline.cbs.nl. Accessed November 14, 2012.

  52. Statistics Netherlands. Population pyramid [fact sheet]. http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/bevolking/cijfers/extra/piramide-fx.htm?Languageswitch=on. Accessed November 13, 2012.

  53. Gobbens, R. J., & van Assen, M. A. (2012). Frailty and its prediction of disability and health care utilization: The added value of interviews and physical measures following a self-report questionnaire. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 55(2), 369–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Campen, C. (2011). Frail older persons in the Netherlands. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pialoux, T., Goyard, J., & Lesourd, B. (2012). Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: A systematic review. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 12(2), 189–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fall, M., Walters, S., Read, S., et al. (1997). An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: Benefits and costs. British Journal of General Practice, 47(424), 699–703.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gallagher, M., Huddart, T., & Henderson, B. (1998). Telephone triage of acute illness by a practice nurse in general practice: Outcomes of care. British Journal of General Practice, 48(429), 1141–1145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank René Schalk for collecting and making available the data.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robbert J. J. Gobbens.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), Part B (25)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobbens, R.J.J., Luijkx, K.G. & van Assen, M.A.L.M. Explaining quality of life of older people in the Netherlands using a multidimensional assessment of frailty. Qual Life Res 22, 2051–2061 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0341-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0341-1

Keywords

Navigation