Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer registry survival analyses have shown that adolescent and young adult patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) have reduced survival compared to those with higher SES. The objective of this study was to determine whether neighborhood- (nSES) and/or individual-level SES (iSES) also predicted current quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors.

Methods

The Socioeconomics and Quality of Life study surveyed adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma at least one year post-diagnosis using population-based ascertainment. Factor analysis was used to create a multidimensional age-relevant iSES score and compared with a preexisting census-block-group derived nSES score. Four quality of life domains were assessed: physical health, psychological and emotional well-being, social relationships, and life skills. Nested multivariable linear regression models were run to test the associations between both SES measures and quality of life and to compare the explanatory power of nSES and iSES.

Results

Data from 110 individuals aged 16–40 were included in the final analysis. After adjustment for sociodemographic confounders, low nSES was associated only with poorer physical health, whereas low iSES was related to poorer quality of life in all four domains with iSES accounting for an additional 14, 12, 25, and 10 % of the variance, respectively.

Conclusions

Measures of SES at the individual as compared to the neighborhood level may be stronger indicators of outcomes in adolescents and young adults, which has important implications for SES measurement in the context of cancer surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SES:

Socioeconomic status

iSES:

individual-level socioeconomic status

nSES:

neighborhood-level socioeconomic status

References

  1. Gage, E. (2010). Examining the most relevant conceptualization of the socioeconomic status construct for cancer research. Cancer Nursing, 33, E1–E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 769–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce, W., Torsheim, T., Currie, C., & Zambon, A. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: Validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research, 78, 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. (2006). Closing the gap: Research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD; 2006 August Report No.: NIH Publication No. 06-6067.

  5. Abrams, A. N., Hazen, E. P., & Penson, R. T. (2007). Psychosocial issues in adolescents with cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 33, 622–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Decker, C. L. (2007). Social support and adolescent cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Psychooncology, 16, 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zebrack, B. J., Yi, J., Petersen, L., & Ganz, P. A. (2008). The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psychooncology, 17, 891–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palermo, T. M., Long, A. C., Lewandowski, A. S., Drotar, D., Quittner, A. L., & Walker, L. S. (2008). Evidence-based assessment of health-related quality of life and functional impairment in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 983–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parsons, S. K., Shih, M. C., Duhamel, K. N., Ostroff, J., Mayer, D. K., Austin, J., et al. (2006). Maternal perspectives on children’s health-related quality of life during the first year after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 1100–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Upton, P., Eiser, C., Cheung, I., Hutchings, H. A., Jenney, M., Maddocks, A., et al. (2005). Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 3, 22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yost, K., Perkins, C., Cohen, R., Morris, C., & Wright, W. (2001). Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes and Control, 12, 703–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleyer, A., Viny, A., & Barr, R. (2006). Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist, 11, 590–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization: Division of Mental Health. (1993). WHO-QOL Study protocol: The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument. Geneva, Switzerland.

  14. Link, N. J., Maurer, E., Largent, J., Kent, E., Morris, R. A., Sender, L. S., et al. (2009). Kids, Adolescents, and young adult cancer study—a methodologic approach in cancer epidemiology research. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2009, 354257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Smith, G. D., & Lynch, J. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position. In J. M. Oakes & J. S. Kaufman (Eds.), Methods in social epidemiology (pp. 47–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chu, K. P., Shema, S., Wu, S., Gomez, S. L., Chang, E. T., & Le, Q. T. (2011). Head and neck cancer-specific survival based on socioeconomic status in Asians and Pacific Islanders. Cancer, 117, 1935–1945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, C. A., Miller, T., Chang, E. T., Yin, D., Cockburn, M., & Gomez, S. L. (2010). Racial and social class gradients in life expectancy in contemporary California. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1373–1380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomez, S. L., Glaser, S. L., McClure, L. A., Shema, S. J., Kealey, M., Keegan, T. H., et al. (2011). The California neighborhoods data system: A new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes and Control, 22, 631–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kent, E. E., Morris, R. A., Largent, J. A., Ziogas, A., Sender, L. S., & Anton-Culver, H. (2010). Socioeconomic impacts on survival differ by race/ethnicity among adolescents and young adults with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2010, 824691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kent, E. E., Sender, L. S., Largent, J. A., & Anton-Culver, H. (2009). Leukemia survival in children, adolescents, and young adults: Influence of socioeconomic status and other demographic factors. Cancer Causes and Control, 20, 1409–1420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Warner, E. T., & Gomez, S. L. (2010). Impact of neighborhood racial composition and metropolitan residential segregation on disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival between black and white women in California. Journal of Community Health, 35, 398–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, D., Morris, C., Allen, M., Cress, R., Bates, J., & Liu, L. (2010). Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups? Cancer Causes and Control, 21, 1721–1730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yost, K. J., Hahn, E. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., Ayanian, J. Z., & West, D. W. (2008). Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, 66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boman, K. K., & Bodegard, G. (2004). Life after cancer in childhood: Social adjustment and educational and vocational status of young-adult survivors. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/oncology, 26, 354–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zambon, A., Morgan, A., Vereecken, C., Colombini, S., Boyce, W., Mazur, J., et al. (2010). The contribution of club participation to adolescent health: Evidence from six countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Langeveld, N. E., Stam, H., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Last, B. F. (2002). Quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 10, 579–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bleyer, W. A. (2002). Cancer in older adolescents and young adults: Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, survival, and importance of clinical trials. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 38, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Topolski, T. D., Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., Huebner, C. E., Connell, F. A., & Mount, K. K. (2001). Quality of life and health-risk behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 426–435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Clinton-McHarg, T., Carey, M., Sanson-Fisher, R., Shakeshaft, A., & Rainbird, K. (2010). Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: A critical review. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, M., Burau, K. D., Fang, S., Wang, H., & Du, X. L. (2008). Ethnic variations in diagnosis, treatment, socioeconomic status, and survival in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer, 113, 3231–3241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bentley, R., Kavanagh, A. M., Subramanian, S. V., & Turrell, G. (2008). Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: A multilevel analysis. Cancer Causes and Control, 19, 183–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas, A. J., Eberly, L. E., Neaton, J. D., & Davey Smith, G. (2007). Census-based and personally reported income measures as long-term risk-adjusted mortality predictors. Public Health, 121, 898–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pickett, K. E., & Pearl, M. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 111–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Scharoun-Lee, M., Adair, L. S., Kaufman, J. S., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2009). Obesity, race/ethnicity and the multiple dimensions of socioeconomic status during the transition to adulthood: A factor analysis approach. Social Science and Medicine, 68, 708–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Green, C. R., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2010). Cancer pain: An age-based analysis. Pain Medicine, 11, 1525–1536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bowen, D. J., Alfano, C. M., McGregor, B. A., Kuniyuki, A., Bernstein, L., Meeske, K., et al. (2007). Possible socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in quality of life in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 106, 85–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ell, K., Xie, B., Wells, A., Nedjat-Haiem, F., Lee, P. J., & Vourlekis, B. (2008). Economic stress among low-income women with cancer: Effects on quality of life. Cancer, 112, 616–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Simon, A. E., & Wardle, J. (2008). Socioeconomic disparities in psychosocial wellbeing in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 44, 572–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zebrack, B. J., Zevon, M. A., Turk, N., Nagarajan, R., Whitton, J., Robison, L. L., et al. (2007). Psychological distress in long-term survivors of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 49, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group [AYAO PRG]. (2006). Closing the gap: Research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD; 2006 August. Report No.: NIH Publication No. 06-6067.

  46. Zebrack, B. (2009). Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 349–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gurney, J. G., Krull, K. R., Kadan-Lottick, N., Nicholson, H. S., Nathan, P. C., Zebrack, B., et al. (2009). Social outcomes in the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 2390–2395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., et al. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. JAMA, 294, 2879–2888.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedman, D. L., Whitton, J., Leisenring, W., Mertens, A. C., Hammond, S., Stovall, M., et al. (2010). Subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102, 1083–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Michel, G., Kuehni, C. E., Rebholz, C. E., Zimmermann, K., Eiser, C., & Rueegg, C. S. et al. (2010) Can health beliefs help in explaining attendance to follow-up care? The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Psychooncology. Aug 4. [Epub ahead of print].

  51. Smith, T., Stein, K. D., Mehta, C. C., Kaw, C., Kepner, J. L., Buskirk, T., et al. (2007). The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer, 109, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sundberg, K. K., Doukkali, E., Lampic, C., Eriksson, L. E., Arvidson, J., & Wettergren, L. (2010). Long-term survivors of childhood cancer report quality of life and health status in parity with a comparison group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 55, 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shen, M., Cozen, W., Huang, L., Colt, J., De Roos, A. J., Severson, R. K., et al. (2008). Census and geographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 350–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Krieger, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2004). “Bodies count,” and body counts: Social epidemiology and embodying inequality. Epidemiologic Reviews, 26, 92–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out as part of Erin Kent’s doctoral dissertation at the University of California, Irvine. Support for this work was provided by a UC MEXUS dissertation grant and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention R36 Public Health Dissertation Grant R36DP002012-01). The authors thank undergraduate research assistants Marym Mohammady and Priyanka Saxena for their assistance with study recruitment coordination and clinical research coordinator Isabel Guzman for her assistance with translation of the study documents into Spanish.

Conflict of interest

The ideas expressed in the following paper are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and/or the Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute of the University of California, Irvine is not intended, nor should it be inferred The SEOOL study was approved by the UC Irvine Institutional Review Board under Human Subjects Numbers 2006-4958 and 2009-7130. The authors have no financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Kent.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig. 1

Fig. 1
figure 1

Population-based case ascertainment flow diagram. An additional six participants from a clinic-based recruitment were also added to the analysis

.

Appendix 2

See Table 6.

Table 6 Factor loadings (>0.3) for individual SES indicators after oblique rotation

Appendix 3

See Table 7.

Table 7 Interfactor correlations for individual SES factors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kent, E.E., Sender, L.S., Morris, R.A. et al. Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma. Qual Life Res 22, 1339–1351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0254-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0254-z

Keywords

Navigation