Perceived health in lung cancer patients: the role of positive and negative affect
- 388 Downloads
To examine the association of affective experience and health-related quality of life in lung cancer patients, we hypothesized that negative affect would be positively, and positive affect would be negatively, associated with perceived health.
A sample of 133 English-speaking lung cancer patients (33% female; mean age = 63.68 years old, SD = 9.37) completed a battery of self-report surveys.
Results of our secondary analysis indicate that trait negative affect was significantly associated with poor physical and social functioning, greater role limitations due to emotional problems, greater bodily pain, and poor general health. Positive affect was significantly associated with adaptive social functioning, fewer emotion-based role limitations, and less severe bodily pain. In a full model, positive affect was significantly associated with greater levels of social functioning and general health, over and above the effects of negative affect.
Reduction of negative affect is an important therapeutic goal, but the ability to maintain positive affect may result in greater perceived health. Indeed, engagement in behaviors that result in greater state positive affect may, over time, result in dispositional changes and enhancement of quality of life.
KeywordsPositive and negative affect Perceived health Role limitations Lung cancer Oncology
- 11.Fredrickson, B. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention and Treatment, 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
- 12.Benyamini, Y., Idler, E. L., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. A. (2000). Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: Expanding our view beyond illness and disability. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(2), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Costa, P. T., & Mc Crae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
- 30.Linde, L., Sorensen, J., Ostergaard, M., Horslev-Petersen, K., & Hetland, M. L. (2008). Health-related quality of life: Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SF-36, EQ-15D, EQ-5D, RAQoL, and HAQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 35(8), 1528–1537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- 39.Lesperance, F., Frasure-Smith, N., Koszycki, D., Laliberte, M. A., van Zyl, L. T., Baker, B., et al. (2007). Effects of citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy on depression in patients with coronary artery disease: The Canadian cardiac randomized evaluation of antidepressant and psychotherapy efficacy (CREATE) trial. JAMA, 297(4), 367–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Da Costa, D., Clarke, A. E., Dobkin, P. L., Senecal, J. L., Fortin, P. R., Danoff, D. S., et al. (1999). The relationship between health status, social support and satisfaction with medical care among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 11(3), 201–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., Schwarz, N., & Smith, D. (2005). Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychology Supplemental Issue: Basic and Applied Decision Making in Cancer Control, 24(4), S57–S62.Google Scholar
- 52.Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11), 152–170.Google Scholar
- 61.Pushkar, D., Chaikelson, J., Conway, M., Etezadi, J., Giannopoulus, C., Li, K., et al. (2010). Testing continuity and activity variables as predictors of positive and negative affect in retirement. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(1), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Schnur, J. B., David, D., Kangas, M., Green, S., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Montgomery, G. H. (2009). A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavioral therapy and hypnosis intervention on positive and negative affect during breast cancer radiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 443–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar