Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Health-related quality of life changes associated with buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few studies have described improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) associated with opioid dependence treatment with buprenorphine (ODT-B).

Objective

To evaluate HRQOL changes in domain scores, physical and mental component summaries, and health utilities (HUs) associated with ODT-B using the Short Form 36 (SF-36).

Methods

We assessed HRQOL changes in a substudy of a pharmacokinetic study that compared buprenorphine oral tablet and liquid dosage formulations over 16 weeks. Individuals, aged 18–65 years, were screened for opioid dependence. They were excluded if they would not agree to birth control or had a serious medical condition. Subjects received psychosocial counseling and weekly group therapy. The SF-36 was administered upon enrollment and at 4-week intervals. We used the SF-6D to estimate HUs. We performed intention to treat (ITT) analyses based on the last observation available for each subject. Paired t tests of each domain and HU, limited to remaining patients at each 4-week interval, were also conducted.

Results

Of 96 subjects enrolled, cumulative dropouts over time resulted in 80, 69, 59, and 44 subjects remaining at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. There were no significant differences in opioid-positive urines, dropout rates, or dosage changes between formulations. In the ITT analyses, HRQOL improvements over time were bodily pain (62.1 vs. 69.1, P = 0.017), vitality (49.8 vs. 56.5, P = 0.001), mental health (59.9 vs. 66.0, P = 0.001), social function (66.4 vs. 74.7, P = 0.001), role emotional (59.4 vs. 71.9, P = 0.003), role physical (60.9 vs. 70.6, P = 0.005), and mental component summary (41.9 vs. 45.4, P<0.001). HU scores also improved (0.674 vs. 0.715, P = 0.001). Results from paired t tests, with only concurrently enrolled patients, showed similar improvements from baseline to 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks.

Conclusion

Buprenorphine, accompanied with psychosocial counseling, was associated with improved HRQOL and HUs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ling, W., & Wesson, D. R. (2003). Clinical efficacy of buprenorphine comparisons to methadone and placebo. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 70(2), S49–S57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fudala, P. J., Bridge, T. P., Herbert, S., et al. (2003). Office-based treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(10), 949–958.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, H. W. (2001). A new era in opioid dependency treatment. Recent law allows qualified physicians to provide care in office setting. Postgrad Med, 109(6), 15–16, 25.

  4. Raisch, D. W., Fye, C. L., Boardman, K. D., & Sather, M. R. (2002). Opioid dependence treatment, including buprenorphine/naloxone. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 36, 312–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Connock, M., Juarez-Garcia, A., Jowett, S., et al. (2007). Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 11(9), 1–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donaher, P. A., & Welsh, C. (2006). Managing opioid addiction with buprenorphine. American Family Physician, 73(9), 1573–1578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ling, W., & Smith, D. (2002). Buprenorphine: blending practice and research. J Subst Abuse Treat, 23(2), 87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torrington, M., Domier, C. P., Hillhouse, M., & Ling, W. (2007). Buprenorphine 101: treating opioid dependence with buprenorphine in an office-based setting. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 26(3), 93–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bell, J., Shanahan, M., Mutch, C., et al. (2007). A randomized trial of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of observed versus unobserved administration of buprenorphine-naloxone for heroin dependence. Addiction, 102(12), 1899–1907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett, P. G., Rodgers, J. H., & Bloch, D. A. (2001). A meta-analysis comparing buprenorphine to methadone for treatment of opiate dependence. Addiction, 96(5), 683–690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, A. H., Gospodarevskaya, E., & Ritter, A. J. (2005). A randomised trial of the cost effectiveness of buprenorphine as an alternative to methadone maintenance treatment for heroin dependence in a primary care setting. Pharmacoeconomics, 23(1), 77–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doran, C. M., Shanahan, M., Mattick, R. P., Ali, R., White, J., & Bell, J. (2003). Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance a cost-effectiveness analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71(3), 295–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giacomuzzi, S. M., Riemer, Y., Ertl, M., et al. (2003). Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment in an ambulant setting a health-related quality of life assessment. Addiction, 98(5), 693–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maremmani, I., Pani, P. P., Pacini, M., & Perugi, G. (2007). Substance use and quality of life over 12 months among buprenorphine maintenance-treated and methadone maintenance-treated heroin-addicted patients. J Subst Abuse Treat, 33(1), 91–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, K. W., & Larson, M. J. (2003). Quality of life assessments by adult substance abusers receiving publicly funded treatment in Massachusetts. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29(2), 323–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanagas, G., Padaiga, Z., & Subata, E. (2004). Drug addiction maintenance treatment and quality of life measurements. Medicina (Kaunas), 40(9), 833–841.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torrens, M., San, L., Martinez, A., Castillo, C., Domingo-Salvany, A., & Alonso, J. (1997). Use of the Nottingham health profile for measuring health status of patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Addiction, 92(6), 707–716.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eklund, C., Melin, L., Hiltunen, A., & Borg, S. (1994). Detoxification from methadone maintenance treatment in Sweden: long-term outcome and effects on quality of life and life situation. Int J Addict, 29(5), 627–645.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reno, R. R., & Aiken, L. S. (1993). Life activities and life quality of heroin addicts in and out of methadone treatment. Int J Addict, 28(3), 211–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Millson, P. E., Challacombe, L., Villeneuve, P. J., et al. (2004). Self-perceived health among Canadian opiate users: a comparison to the general population and to other chronic disease populations. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Calsyn, D. A., Saxon, A. J., Bush, K. R., et al. (2004). The addiction severity index medical and psychiatric composite scores measure similar domains as the SF-36 in substance-dependent veterans: concurrent and discriminant validity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 76, 165–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ, 21(2), 271–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1(1), 4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan, R. M., Ganiats, T. G., Sieber, W. J., & Anderson, J. P. (1998). The quality of well-being scale: Critical similarities and differences with SF-36. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10(6), 509–520.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Compton, P., Ling, W., Moody, D., & Chiang, N. (2006). Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and opioid effects of liquid versus tablet buprenorphine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 82(1), 25–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(1), 40–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31(3), 247–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinksi M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute New England Medical Journal, Boston, 1993).

  33. Hollingworth, W., Sullivan, S. D., Emerson, S. S., Gray, D. T., & Jarvik, J. G. (2002). The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain. Health Economics, 11, 71–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sherbourne, C. D., Unützer, J., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Lenert, L. A., Sturm, R., et al. (2001). Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression? Medical Care, 39(11), 1246–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pyne, J. M., Rost, K. M., Zhang, M., Williams, D. K., Smith, J., & Fortney, J. (2003). Cost-effectiveness of a primary care depression intervention. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 432–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lobo, F. S., Gross, C. R., & Matthees, B. J. (2004). Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores from the SF-36 in lung transplant patients. Quality of Life Research, 13, 377–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Green, C., Brazier, J., & Deverill, M. (2000). Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(2), 151–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Raisch, D. W. (2000). Understanding quality-adjusted life years and their application to pharmacoeconomic research. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 34(7–8), 906–914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mattick, R. P., Ali, R., White, J. M., O’Brien, S., Wolk, S., & Danz, C. (2003). Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients. Addiction, 98(4), 441–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lintzeris, N., Bell, J., Bammer, G., Jolley, D. J., & Rushworth, L. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine in the management of short-term ambulatory heroin withdrawal. Addiction, 97(11), 1395–1404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ling, W., Charuvastra, C., Collins, J. F., et al. (1998). Buprenorphine maintenance treatment of opiate dependence: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 93(4), 475–486.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ponizovsky, A. M., & Grinshpoon, A. (2007). Quality of life among heroin users on buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(5), 631–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ballantyne, J. C., & LaForge, K. S. (2007). Opioid dependence and addiction during opioid treatment of chronic pain. Pain, 129(3), 235–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miotto, K., Compton, P., Ling, W., & Conolly, M. (1996). Diagnosing addictive disease in chronic pain patients. Psychosomatics, 37(3), 223–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, S. M., Compton, P., Bolus, R., et al. (2006). The addiction behaviors checklist: validation of a new clinician-based measure of inappropriate opioid use in chronic pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(4), 342–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hatoum, H. T., Brazier, J. E., & Akhras, K. S. (2004). Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value Health, 7(5), 602–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Busschbach, J. (2004). A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Economics, 13(9), 873–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Harrison, M. J., Davies, L. M., Bansback, N. J., et al. (2009). The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1195–1205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Khanna, D., Furst, D. E., Wong, W. K., et al. (2007). Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1083–1092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee, B. B., King, M. T., Simpson, J. M., et al. (2008). Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population. Value Health, 11(4), 680–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Broz, D., & Ouellet, L. J. (2008). Racial and ethnic changes in heroin injection in the United States: implications for the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 94(1–3), 221–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Badia, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., & Kind, P. (2001). A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making, 21(1), 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gabriel, S. E., Kneeland, T. S., Melton, L. J., 3rd, Moncur, M. M., Ettinger, B., & Tosteson, A. N. (1999). Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: Whose values should we use? Med Decis Making, 19(2), 141–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, I. C., Willke, R. J., Atkinson, M. J., Lenderking, W. R., Frangakis, C., & Wu, A. W. (2007). US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference? Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1065–1072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under an interagency agreement at the NIDA/VA Medication Development Research Unit (MDRU) at the West LA VA Medical Center, # DA 50038, to Walter Ling as principal investigator. There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Dennis W. Raisch & Mike R. Sather

  2. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Dennis W. Raisch, Heather M. Campbell, David A. Garnand, Mark A. Jones & Mike R. Sather

  3. Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA

    Rupali Naik

  4. David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Walter Ling

Authors
  1. Dennis W. Raisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather M. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David A. Garnand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark A. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mike R. Sather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rupali Naik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Walter Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis W. Raisch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raisch, D.W., Campbell, H.M., Garnand, D.A. et al. Health-related quality of life changes associated with buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. Qual Life Res 21, 1177–1183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0027-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0027-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation