Abstract
Purpose
Accepting pain rather than trying to control it has been the focus of recent pain management research. Pain acceptance often has been assessed using the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ). This study aimed to evaluate the factor structure and other psychometric properties of a Korean language version of the CPAQ (KCPAQ).
Methods
This study used two archival data sets collected over two different time periods at the same site in Korea, generating two samples (Total N = 361).
Results
Exploratory factor analysis using sample 1 (N = 182) provided support for the same two-factor structure as the original English CPAQ. Confirmatory factor analysis using sample 2 (N = 179) demonstrated the adequacy of the two-factor model obtained from sample 1. Samples 1 and 2 were combined for the reliability and validity analyses. The results indicated that the KCPAQ has good internal consistency and test–retest stability. The KCPAQ was significantly correlated with pain intensity, pain-related anxiety, depressive symptoms, physical adjustment, and psychosocial adjustment.
Conclusion
The KCPAQ has reliability and construct validity support for the measurement of pain acceptance in a Korean patient sample with chronic pain.
Abbreviations
- CPAQ:
-
Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire
- CPP:
-
Chronic pain patient
- KCPAQ:
-
Korean version of chronic pain acceptance questionnaire
- AE:
-
Activity engagement
- PW:
-
Pain willingness
- EFA:
-
Exploratory factor analysis
- PAF:
-
Principal axis factoring
- CFA:
-
Confirmatory factor analysis
- RMSEA:
-
Root-mean square error of approximation
- CFI:
-
Comparative fit index
- NNFI:
-
Non-normed fit index
References
Kim, S. H., Bae, G. R., & Lim, H. S. (2006). Prevalence and risk factors of fibromyalgia syndrome and chronic widespread pain in two communities in Korea-First report in Korean. Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association, 13, 18–25.
Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: Evolution and revolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 678–690.
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.
Reneman, M. F., Dijkstra, A., Geertzen, J. H. B., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2010). Psychometric properties of chronic pain acceptance questionnaires: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 14, 457–465.
McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2003). Coping or acceptance: What to do with chronic pain? Pain, 105, 197–204.
McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2006). A comparison of the relative utility of coping and acceptance-based measures in a sample of chronic pain sufferers. European Journal of Pain, 10, 23–29.
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2007). A prospective investigation of acceptance and control-oriented coping with chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 339–349.
McCracken, L. M., & Vowles, K. E. (2005). Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1335–1346.
Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009). Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and valued-based action in chronic pain: Findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16, 49–58.
Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., McLeod, C., & Eccleston, C. (2008). The chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups. Pain, 140, 284–291.
Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Melin, L. (2009). The chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ)—further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. European Journal of Pain, 13, 760–768.
McCracken, L. M., Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Eccleston, C. (2010). Acceptance of pain in adolescents with chronic pain: Validation of an adapted assessment instrument and preliminary correlation analyses. European Journal of Pain, 14, 316–320.
Nilges, P., Köster, B., & Schmidt, C. O. (2007). Pain acceptance–concept and validation of a German version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. Schmerz, 21, 60–67.
Rodero, B., Garcia-Campayo, J., Casanueva, B., del Hoyo, Y. L., Serrano-Blanco, A., & Luciano, J. V. (2010). Validation of the Spanish version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 37–46.
Ning, M. C., Ming, T. W., Mae, J. Y., & Ping, C. P. (2008). Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in Cantonese-speaking Chinese patients. Journal of Pain, 9, 823–832.
McCracken, L. M., & Dhingra, L. (2002). A short version of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS-20): Preliminary development and validity. Pain Research and Management, 7, 45–50.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
Fish, R. A., McGuire, B., Hogan, M., Morrison, T. G., & Stewart, I. (2010). Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain, 149, 435–443.
Ahn, B. C. (2010). Changes in sex roles in Korean society: The present state and responses. Society and Social Theory, 17, 257–277.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation 2005; 10. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (2010-0015788).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, S., Heiby, E.M., McCracken, L.M. et al. Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients. Qual Life Res 21, 1059–1064 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0010-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0010-9