Abstract
Purpose
This study sought to evaluate the Chinese version of the eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), through standard psychometric techniques.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 Parkinson’s disease patients attending a Movement Disorders Unit. Neurologists’ assessments were based on Hoehn and Yahr, Schwab and England and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scales. Patients’ self-evaluations included the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire, the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and PDQ-8, pain, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Analyses for internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and construct validity were performed.
Results
There was no evidence of floor or ceiling effects. The alpha coefficient was 0.81. Correlation of social support and bodily discomfort with the PDQ-8 was modest (0.46 and 0.36, respectively). PDQ-8 convergent validity with the PDQ-39 was very high (r = 0.96), and known-groups validity proved satisfactory.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest the PDQ-8 is a valid and reliable disease-specific health-related quality-of-life instrument for Parkinson’s disease in Taiwan when used independently of the PDQ-39.
Abbreviations
- ADL:
-
Activities of daily living
- AGFI:
-
Adjusted goodness-of-fit index
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- CFI:
-
Comparative fit index
- GFI:
-
Goodness-of-fit index
- HRQoL:
-
Health-related quality of life
- H & Y:
-
Hoehn and Yahr
- PDQ-8:
-
Eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire
- PDQ-39:
-
Thirty-nine-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire
- PSQI:
-
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
- RMSEA:
-
Root-mean-square error of approximation
- TDQ:
-
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire
- UPDRS:
-
Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
References
Rahman, S., Griffin, H. J., Quinn, N. P., & Jahanshahi, M. (2008). Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: The relative importance of the symptoms. Movement Disorders, 23(10), 1428–1434.
Damiano, A. M., Snyder, C., Strausser, B., & Willian, M. K. (1999). A review of health-related quality-of-life concepts and measures for Parkinson’s disease. Quality of Life Research, 8(3), 235–243.
Marinus, J., Ramaker, C., van Hilten, J. J., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2002). Health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review of disease specific instruments. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72(2), 241–248.
Hagell, P., & Nygren, C. (2007). The 39- item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: Implications for evidence based medicine. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78(11), 1191–1198.
Marinus, J., Visser, M., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2004). Quality of life and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic comparison of disease-specific instruments [Dutch]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Fysiotherapie, 114(3), 67–71.
Jenkinson, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2007). Cross-cultural evaluation of the short form 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8): Results from America, Canada, Japan, Italy and Spain. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 13(1), 22–28.
Ware, J. E. Jr., Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., McHorney, C. A., Rogers, W. H., & Raczek, A. (1995). Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: Summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care, 33(4), AS264–AS279.
Tan, L. C., Luo, N., Nazri, M., Li, S. C., & Thumboo, J. (2004). Validity and reliability of the PDQ-39 and the PDQ-8 in English-speaking Parkinson’s disease patients in Singapore. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 10(8), 493–499.
Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., & Ferriero, G. (2008). Rasch analysis of the short form 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Quality of Life Research, 17(4), 541–548.
Katsarou, Z., Bostantjopoulou, S., Peto, V., Kafantari, A., Apostolidou, E., & Peitsidou, E. (2004). Assessing quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: Can a short-form questionnaire be useful? Movement Disorders, 19(3), 308–312.
Luo, N., Tan, L. C., Zhao, Y., Lau, P. N., Au, W. L., & Li, S. C. (2009). Determination of the longitudinal validity and minimally important difference of the 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Movement Disorders, 24(2), 183–187.
Tan, L. C., Lau, P. N., Au, W. L., & Luo, N. (2007). Validation of PDQ-8 as an independent instrument in English and Chinese. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 255(1–2), 77–80.
Ma, H. I., Hwang, W. J., & Chen-Sea, M. J. (2005). Reliability and validity testing of a Chinese-translated version of the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 565–569.
Fahn, S., Elton, R. L., & Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. (1987). The unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, D. B. Calne, & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Recent developments in Parkinson’s Disease, Vol. 2 (pp. 153–163, 293–304). Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Healthcare Information.
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17(5), 427–442.
Schwab, R. S., & England, A. C., Jr. (1969). Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s Disease. In F. J. Gilingham & I. M. L. Donaldson (Eds.), Third symposium on Parkinson’s disease (pp. 152–157). Edinburgh, UK: E & S Livingstone.
Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., & Peto, V. (1998). The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire: User manual for the PDQ-39, PDQ-8 and the PDQ Summary Index. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit.
Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., Peto, V., Greenhall, R., & Hyman, N. (1997). The PDQ-8: Development and validation of a short-form Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire. Psychology & Health, 12(6), 805–814.
Lee, Y., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu, N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23(11), 688–694.
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., I. I. I., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193–213.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Zhao, Y. J., Tan, L. C., Lau, P. N., Au, W. L., Li, S. C., & Luo, N. (2008). Factors affecting health-related quality of life amongst Asian patients with Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 15(7), 737–742.
Caap-Ahlgren, M., & Dehlin, O. (2004). Sense of coherence is a sensitive measure for changes in subjects with Parkinson’s disease during 1 year. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(2), 154–159.
Carod-Artal, F. J., Ziomkowski, S., Mourao Mesquita, H., & Martinez-Martin, P. (2008). Anxiety and depression: Main determinants of health-related quality of life in Brazilian patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 14(2), 102–108.
Martinez-Martin, P., Catalan, M. J., Benito-Leon, J., Moreno, A. O., Zamarbide, I., Cubo, E., et al. (2006). Impact of fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: The Fatigue impact scale for daily use (D-FIS). Quality of Life Research, 15(4), 597–606.
Menza, M., Dobkin, R. D., Marin, H., Mark, M. H., Gara, M., Buyske, S., et al. (2009). The impact of treatment of depression on quality of life, disability and relapse in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 24(9), 1325–1332.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to thank all the study participants for sharing their experiences.
Ethical approval
This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Gung University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, TT., Hsu, HY., Wang, BH. et al. Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease patients: validation of the Short-Form Eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) in Taiwan. Qual Life Res 20, 499–505 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9777-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9777-3