Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to apply a bi-factor model for the determination of test dimensionality and a multidimensional CAT using computer simulations of real data for the assessment of a new global physical health measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

Parent respondents of 306 children with cerebral palsy were recruited from four pediatric rehabilitation hospitals and outpatient clinics. We compared confirmatory factor analysis results across four models: (1) one-factor unidimensional; (2) two-factor multidimensional (MIRT); (3) bi-factor MIRT with fixed slopes; and (4) bi-factor MIRT with varied slopes. We tested whether the general and content (fatigue and pain) person score estimates could discriminate across severity and types of CP, and whether score estimates from a simulated CAT were similar to estimates based on the total item bank, and whether they correlated as expected with external measures.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis suggested separate pain and fatigue sub-factors; all 37 items were retained in the analyses. From the bi-factor MIRT model with fixed slopes, the full item bank scores discriminated across levels of severity and types of CP, and compared favorably to external instruments. CAT scores based on 10- and 15-item versions accurately captured the global physical health scores.

Conclusions

The bi-factor MIRT CAT application, especially the 10- and 15-item versions, yielded accurate global physical health scores that discriminated across known severity groups and types of CP, and correlated as expected with concurrent measures. The CATs have potential for collecting complex data on the physical health of children with CP in an efficient manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel, J., Petrina, T., Dudgeon, B., & McKearnan, K. (2006). Cerebral palsy and chronic pain: A descriptive study of children and adolescents. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25, 73–84. doi:10.1300/J006v25n04_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berrin, S., Malcarne, V., Varni, J., Burwinkle, T., Sherman, S., Artavia, K., et al. (2007). Pain, fatigue, and school functioning in children with cerebral palsy: A path-analytic model. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 330–337. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsl017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tervo, R., Symons, F., Stout, J., & Novacheck, T. (2006). Parental report of pain and associated limitations in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 928–934. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Houlihan, C., O’Donnell, M., Conaway, M., & Stevenson, R. (2004). Bodily pain and health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 305–310. doi:10.1017/S0012162204000507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Castle, K., Imms, C., & Jun, H. (2007). Being in pain: A phenomenological study of young people with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 445–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Varni, J., Burwinkle, T., Berrin, S., Sherman, S., Artavia, K., Malcarne, V., et al. (2006). The PedsQL in pediatric cerebral palsy: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Generic Core Scales and Cerebral Palsy Module. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 442–449. doi:10.1017/S001216220600096X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rimmer, J. (2001). Physical fitness levels of persons with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 208–212. doi:10.1017/S0012162201000391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vargus-Adams, J. (2006). Longitudinal use of the Child Health Questionnaire in childhood cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 343–347. doi:10.1017/S0012162206000752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narayanan, U., Fehlings, D., Weir, S., Knights, S., & Kiran, S. (2006). Initial development and validation of the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 804–812. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. White-Koning, M., Arnaud, C., Bourdet-Lubere, S., Bazex, H., Colver, A. F., & Grandjean, H. (2005). Subjective quality of life in children with intellectual impairment—how can it be assessed? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 281–285. doi:10.1017/S0012162205000526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Novacheck, T., Stout, J., & Tervo, R. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 20, 75–81. doi:10.1097/00004694-200001000-00017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Landgraf, J., Abetz, L., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1996). The CHQ: A user’s manual (1st ed.). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bottos, M., & Gericke, C. (2003). Ambulatory capacity in cerebral palsy: Prognostic criteria and consequences for intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45, 786–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, S43–S51. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobusse, G., & van Buuren, S. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629–2638. doi:10.1002/sim.2753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Revicki, D., & Cella, D. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595–600. doi:10.1023/A:1018420418455.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J.-S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 133–141. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hays, R., & Lipscomb, J. (2007). Next steps for use of item response theory in the assessment of health outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 195–199. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9175-7.

  19. Ware, J. E., Jr., Gandek, B., Sinclair, S., & Bjorner, B. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: Implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 71–78. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.1.71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hambleton, R. K. (1989) Principles and selected applications of Item Response Theory. In Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 147–200). New York: American Council on Education-Macmillan Publishing Company.

  22. Ackerman, T. (1989). Unidimensional IRT calibration of compensatory and noncompensatory multidimensional items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 113–127. doi:10.1177/014662168901300201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haley, S., Ni, P., Ludlow, L., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223–1229. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reise, S., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reeve, B., Hays, R., Bjorner, J., Cook, K., Crane, P., Teresi, J., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl 1), S22–S31. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorter, J., Rosenbaum, P., Hanna, S., Palisano, R., Bartlett, D., Russell, D., et al. (2004). Limb distribution, motor impairment, and functional classification of cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 461–467. doi:10.1017/S0012162204000763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tucker, C., Haley, S., Watson, K., Dumas, H., Fragala-Pinkham, M., Gorton, G., et al. (2008). Physical function for children and youth with cerebral palsy: Item bank development for computer adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 1, 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dumas, H., Watson, K., Fragala-Pinkham, M., Haley, S., Bilodeau, N., Montpetit, K., et al. (2008). Cognitive interviewing to elicit parent feedback of test items for assessing physical function in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 20, 356–362. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818ac500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 214–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Daltroy, L., Liang, M., Fossel, A., & Goldberg, M. (1998). The POSNA Pediatric Musculoskeletal Functional Health Questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 18, 561–571. doi:10.1097/00004694-199809000-00001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kass, R., & Wasserman, L. (1995). A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwartz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 928–934. doi:10.2307/2291327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, F., West, S., & Sousa, K. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Adams, R., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0146621697211001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Drasgow, F., Levine, M., & Williams, E. (1985). Appropriateness measurement with polytomous item response models and standardized indices. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ackerman, T., Hombo, C., & Neustel, S. (2002). Evaluating indices used to assess the goodness-of-fit of the compensatory multidimensional item response theory model. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.

  37. DeMars, C. (2005). Scoring subscales using multidimensional item response theory models. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  38. Ackerman, T. (1994). Using multidimensional item response theory to understand what items and tests are measuring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 255–278. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0704_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Segall, D. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331–354. doi:10.1007/BF02294343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jackson, D. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 128–141. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schenker, R., Coster, W., & Parush, S. (2005). Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 539–552. doi:10.1080/09638280400018437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Harvey, A., Robin, J., Morris, M., Graham, H., & Baker, R. (2008). A systematic review of measures of activity limitation for children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50, 190–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Coster, W., Haley, S., Ni, P., Dumas, H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622–629. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haley, S., Raczek, A., Coster, W., Dumas, H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932–939. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Haley, S., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M., Skrinar, A., & Corzo, D. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical function in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 113–120. doi:10.1017/S0012162205000204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Shriners Hospital for Children Foundation (Grant # 8957) and an Independent Scientist award to Dr. Haley (National Center on Medical Rehabilitation Research/NICHD/NIH, grant # K02 HD45354-01A1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Haley.

Appendix: Global Physical Health Scale

Appendix: Global Physical Health Scale

  • How often is your child’s neck stiff?

  • How often is your child’s body stiff?

  • How often is at least one of your child’s arms stiff?

  • How often is at least one of your child’s legs stiff?

  • How often does your child have trouble holding his/her head up when he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child get physically tired when sitting in a chair or wheelchair at home or at school for more than 1 h?

  • How often does your child have trouble changing positions because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble with transfers because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble standing for 5 min because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble walking because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble climbing a flight of 8–12 steps because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble running because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have trouble playing games or sports with other children because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child trip and fall because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have difficulty getting around by him/herself because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have difficulty with school activities because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child have difficulty concentrating on homework, reading, or quiet activities because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child need time during the day to rest?

  • How often does your child have difficulty doing activities after a day of school because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does your child miss school because he/she is physically tired?

  • How often does physical pain make falling asleep at night hard for your child?

  • How often does physical pain wake up your child at night?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when sitting in a chair or wheelchair?

  • How often does your child have physical pain with transfers?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when changing positions?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when standing?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when moving around?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when climbing one flight of 8–12 steps?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when running?

  • For this question, “playing games and sports” means activities that children play with other children such as tag, basketball or bowling. How often does your child have physical pain when playing games or sports?

  • How often does your child have physical pain when riding in a car, bus or train?

  • How often does your child miss school because of physical pain?

  • How often does your child participate in indoor recreational activities without getting physically tired?

  • How often is your child physically active?

  • How often does your child’s physical pain interfere with wearing his/her braces or splints?

  • How often does your child’s physical pain interfere with using his/her adaptive equipment?

  • How often does your child drool when sitting quietly?

  • How often does your child drool with activity?

  • Rating scale: Always; Often; Sometimes; Rarely; Never; Not Applicable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haley, S.M., Ni, P., Dumas, H.M. et al. Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Qual Life Res 18, 359–370 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9447-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9447-5

Keywords

Navigation