Introduce and explore issues at an international conference about the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice.
Review of salient literature, clinical and personal experiences, conference presentations and discussions, and post-conference comments from outside experts.
PROs (information from patients about a health condition and its management) have been assessed through self-reports for at least four decades. Traditional applications are in clinical and health services research. Uses in clinical practice, although increasing, are less common and more challenging. PROs can enhance the understanding of patients’ experiences and responses to therapy and inform clinical practice.
We pose and discuss four main questions: (1) Will clinicians accept PRO measures? (2) Will clinicians use PRO measures? (3) Will measuring PROs actually improve those outcomes? (4) Will PROs be perceived as having other, less salutary purposes? A patient-centered perspective on PRO measurement presents issues about the extent to which PROs can accurately capture patient experiences and assess psychosocial and environmental factors that influence communication with clinicians and eventual outcomes. We end with comments about the intersection of PROs and bioethics, noting contributions that PROs may make to beneficence, patient autonomy, and distributive justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Activities of daily living
Health-related quality of life
Quality of life
Aaronson, N. K., & Snyder, C. (2008). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Proceedings of an international society of quality of life research conference. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9422-6.
Donaldson, G. (2008). Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9408-4.
Donaldson, M. S. (2008). Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: Incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9414-6.
Fayers, P. M. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: A role for cluster-randomised trials. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9391-9.
Feldman-Stewart, D., & Brundage, M. D. (2008). A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: A tool in the PRO research tool box. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9417-3.
Fung, C. H., & Hays, R. D. (2008). Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9379-5.
Ware, J. E. Jr. (1976). Scales for measuring general health perceptions. Health Services Research, 11(4), 396–415.
Ware, J. E. Jr., Brook, R. H., Davies, A. R., & Lohr, K. N. (1981). Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. American Journal of Public Health, 71(6), 620–625.
Stewart, A. L., Ware, J. E. Jr., & Brook, R. H. (1981). Advances in the measurement of functional status: Construction of aggregate indexes. Medical Care, 19(5), 473–488. doi:10.1097/00005650-198105000-00001.
Bergner, M. (1985). Measurement of health status. Medical Care, 23(5), 696–704. doi:10.1097/00005650-198505000-00028.
Bergner, M., & Rothman, M. L. (1987). Health status measures: An overview and guide for selection. Annual Review of Public Health, 8, 191–210. doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.001203.
Patrick, D. L., & Bergner, M. (1990). Measurement of health status in the 1990s. Annual Review of Public Health, 11, 165–183. doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.11.050190.001121.
Lohr, K. N. (1989). Advances in health status assessment. Overview of the conference. Medical Care, 27(3 Suppl), S1–S11. doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00001.
Lohr, K. N. (1992). Applications of health status assessment measures in clinical practice. Overview of the third conference on advances in health status assessment. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS1–MS14. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00001.
Cella, D. F., & Tulsky, D. S. (1993). Quality of life in cancer: Definition, purpose, and method of measurement. Cancer Investigation, 11(3), 327–336. doi:10.3109/07357909309024860.
Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118(8), 622–629.
McHorney, C. A. (1999). Health status assessment methods for adults: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Annual Review of Public Health, 20, 309–335. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309.
McHorney, C. A. (2003). Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(5 Pt 2), 403–409.
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowling, A. (2001). Measuring disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Bowling, A. (Ed.). (2004). Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Lipscomb, J., Gotay, C. C., & Snyder, C. (2005). Outcomes assessment in cancer: Measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Australian Centre on Quality of Life. Bibliography. 2007.
Sloan, J. A., Halyard, M. Y., Frost, M. H., et al.; Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. (2007). The Mayo Clinic manuscript series relative to the discussion, dissemination, and operationalization of the Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes. Value in Health, 10(Suppl), S59–S63. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00267.x.
Lipscomb, J., Reeve, B. B., Clauser, S. B., et al. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: Taking stock, moving forward. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(32), 5133–5140. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644.
Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S1–S2. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076.74.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.
Bergner, M. (1986). Functional health assessments: Are they ready for use in clinical practice? The Journal of Family Practice, 23(5), 423–424.
Siegrist, J., & Junge, A. (1989). Conceptual and methodological problems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 29(3), 463–468. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(89)90295-5.
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307. doi:10.1007/BF01593882.
Dassow, P. L. (2007). Measuring performance in primary care: What patient outcome indicators do physicians value? Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20(1), 1–8. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060082.
Frost, M. H., Bonomi, A. E., Cappelleri, J. C., Schunemann, H. J., Moynihan, T. J., & Aaronson, N. K. (2007). Applying quality-of-life data formally and systematically into clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82(10), 1214–1228.
Velanovich, V. (2007). Using quality-of-life measurements in clinical practice. Surgery, 141(2), 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.10.002.
Deyo, R. A., & Carter, W. B. (1992). Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS176–MS186. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00015.
Wasson, J., Keller, A., Rubenstein, L., Hays, R., Nelson, E., & Johnson, D. (1992). Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician’s point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS42–MS49. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00004.
Greenfield, S., & Nelson, E. C. (1992). Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS23–MS41. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00003.
Feinstein, A. R. (1983). An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 99(6), 843–848.
Feinstein, A. R. (1992). Benefits and obstacles for development of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS50–MS56. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00005.
Thier, S. O. (1992). Forces motivating the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings and related clinical research. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS15–MS22. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00002.
Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 322(7297), 1297–1300. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297.
Detmar, S. B., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study. European Journal of Cancer, 34(8), 1181–1186. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00018-5.
Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027–3034. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027.
Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor–patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86(1), 51–59. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600001.
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.
Detmar, S. B., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D., Muller, M., & Schornagel, J. H. (2000). How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(18), 3295–3301.
Shin, H. G., & Bruno, R. (2003). Language use and English-speaking ability: 2000, Census 2000 brief. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.
US Census Bureau (2006). 2004 American Community Survey: Nativity by language spoken at home by ability to speak English for the population age 5 years and over. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.
Leigh, S. (1994). Cancer survivorship: A consumer movement. Seminars in Oncology, 21(6), 783–786.
Stovall, E. L. (1996). Practice guidelines: Patients’ perspective. Oncology (Williston Park), 10(11 Suppl), 255–260.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H.-J., & Bishop, G. (2006). The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 193–212. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050304.
Torbjørn, M. (1998). Mode of administration and interviewer effects in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Social Indicators Research, 45(1), 279–318. doi:10.1023/A:1006958100504.
Zoppi, K. A., & Epstein, R. M. (2002). Interviewing in medical settings. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 355–384). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Beisecker, A. E. (1990). Patient power in doctor–patient communication: What do we know? Health Communication, 2(2), 105–122. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0202_4.
Briggs, C. L. (2002). Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 911–922). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hill, M. E. (2002). Race of the interviewer and perception of skin color: Evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 99–108. doi:10.2307/3088935.
Pickery, J., Loosveldt, G., & Carlton, A. (2001). The effects of interviewer and respondent characteristics on response behavior in panel surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(4), 509–523. doi:10.1177/0049124101029004004.
Del Boca, F. K., & Noll, J. A. (2000). Truth or consequences: The validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction, 95(Suppl 3), S347–S360.
Kane, E. W., & MacAulay, L. J. (1993). Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 1–28. doi:10.1086/269352.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Institute of Medicine. (2008). Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2006). National healthcare disparities report, 2006. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Povar, G. J. (1991). What does “quality” mean: Critical ethical issues for quality assurance. In R. H. Palmer, A. Donabedian, & G. J. Povar (Eds.), Striving for quality in health care. An inquiry into policy and practice. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.
The authors thank Loraine Monroe of RTI International for her outstanding word-processing support.
Kathleen N. Lohr—Distinguished Fellow (Health Services Research).
Bradley J. Zebrack—Associate Professor and 23-year survivor of Hodgkin’s disease.
About this article
Cite this article
Lohr, K.N., Zebrack, B.J. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 18, 99–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9413-7