Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of the Japanese version of EORTC QLQ-CR38

  • Brief Communcation
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR38).

Methods

The questionnaire was tested among 109 colorectal cancer patients on several occasions. The timing was prior to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, during treatment and 3 months following the second assessment. For purpose of test–retest reliability, a subgroup of patients completed the QLQ-CR38 1 week following the third assessment.

Results

Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the hypothesised scale structure of both the function scales and the symptom scales except female sexual problem scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for seven of the nine scales exceeded the 0.7 criterion at one or both assessments. The test–retest reliability for all scales except three symptom scales was 0.67 or higher. On the basis of known-groups comparisons, four of 46 comparisons distinguished between patients differing in disease stage, initial and on-treatment performance status and presence or absence of a stoma. Additionally, these scales detected change over time as a function of change in performance status and treatment-induced change.

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that the Japanese EORTC QLQ-CR38 may be a reliable and valid supplementary measure of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, A., Berman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Apoplone, G., Filiberti, A., Cifani, S., Ruggiata, R., & Mosconi, P. (1998). Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 health survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival patients. Annals of Oncology, 9, 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprangers, M. A. G., Velde, A., & Aaronson, N. K. (1999). The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Journal of Cancer, 35, 238–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shirasaka, T., Shimamoto, Y., Ohshimo, H., Yamaguchi, M., Kato, T., Yonekura, K., & Fukushima, M. (1996). Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs, 7, 548–557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsunoda, A., Yasuda, N., Nakao, K., Narita, K., Watanabe, M., Suzuki, N., & Kusano, M. (2007). Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Oncology, 72, 58–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sprangers, M. A. G., Cull, A., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., & Aaronson, N. K. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to quality of life assessment: Guideline for developing questionnaire modules. Quality of Life Research, 2, 287–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobayashi, K., Takeda, F., Teramukai, S., Gotoh, I., Sakai, H., Yoneda, S., et al. (1998). A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 810–815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grumann, M. M., Noack, E. M., Hoffmann, I. A., & Schlag, P. M. (2001). Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt, C. E., Bestmann, B., Kuchler, T., Longo, W. E. L., & Kremer, B. (2005). Prospective evaluation of quality of life of patients receiving either abdominoperineal resection or sphincter-preserving procedure for rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 12, 117–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsunoda, A., Shibusawa, M., Tanizaki, H., & Kusano, M. (2004). Hypogastric nerve preservation does not increase local recurrence after surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 51, 1354–1357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life for their permission to translate the QLQ-CR38 and for the time spent to approve the translated questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tsunoda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsunoda, A., Yasuda, N., Nakao, K. et al. Validation of the Japanese version of EORTC QLQ-CR38. Qual Life Res 17, 317–322 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9298-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9298-x

Keywords

Navigation