Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Commentary on Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MA Petersen M Groenvold N Aaronson et al. (2005) ArticleTitleScoring based on item response theory did not alter the measurement ability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales J Clin Epidemiol 58 902–908 Occurrence Handle16085193 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. PK Crane G Belle Particlevan EB Larson (2004) ArticleTitleTest bias in a cognitive test: differential item functioning in the CASI Stat Med 23 241–256 Occurrence Handle14716726 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sim.1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK

    N. W. Scott & P. M. Fayers

  2. Quality of Life Unit, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Brussels, Belgium

    A. Bottomley

  3. Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    N. K. Aaronson

  4. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    A. de Graeff

  5. Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    M. Groenvold & M. A. Petersen

  6. Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    M. Groenvold

  7. Centre for Clinical Studies, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    M. Koller

  8. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. A. G. Sprangers

Authors
  1. N. W. Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. M. Fayers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Bottomley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. K. Aaronson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. de Graeff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Groenvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Koller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. A. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M. A. G. Sprangers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the EORTC, the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group and the EORTC Quality of Life Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Fayers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, N.W., Fayers, P.M., Bottomley, A. et al. Response to Commentary on Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses. Qual Life Res 15, 1119–1120 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0056-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0056-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation